About to order another A-series & trying to make a decision. Looking between the 3 & 5.
I have an A-3 McMillan that I have become very fond of. I do not own a A-5 stock but have sit behind several but no extended experience with one.
I realize the main differences are the A-5 wider forearm & the butthook. Other than the wide forearm (especially for larger barrels) can anyone explain why the A-5's are so much more popular?
With a bi-pod in front (pretty much the way they are ment to be used) I actually find the A-3 to be more friendly. It's much easier to get elevation "help" from the drop on the A-3 by pushing/pulling the gun over the bag. I did find the butthook on A-5 comfortable when shooting with hand only in the back but not largly better than the A-3. The A-5 was OK with a squeeze bag but not as "quick" it seemed. With an owl-ear bag it was dang right aggrevating (elevation adjustment).
Am I missing something with the A-5??? Were is the advantage? I see 10-1 A-5's over the A-3's.
I have an A-3 McMillan that I have become very fond of. I do not own a A-5 stock but have sit behind several but no extended experience with one.
I realize the main differences are the A-5 wider forearm & the butthook. Other than the wide forearm (especially for larger barrels) can anyone explain why the A-5's are so much more popular?
With a bi-pod in front (pretty much the way they are ment to be used) I actually find the A-3 to be more friendly. It's much easier to get elevation "help" from the drop on the A-3 by pushing/pulling the gun over the bag. I did find the butthook on A-5 comfortable when shooting with hand only in the back but not largly better than the A-3. The A-5 was OK with a squeeze bag but not as "quick" it seemed. With an owl-ear bag it was dang right aggrevating (elevation adjustment).
Am I missing something with the A-5??? Were is the advantage? I see 10-1 A-5's over the A-3's.