Re: Beard Hearing
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dbsinh20</div><div class="ubbcode-body">That's a classic. Photographic evidence of no seal whatsoever - if you knew what to look for, you'd be laughing at that picture.
But in reality, it's no laughing matter. This type of mask is not designed to seal with a beard or tactical turban. A hood type mask is the only viable option. Hopefully they've hooked him up with the proper equipment, and this picture is just a PR shot. Even with the rest of a CW suit, he wouldn't make it with a standard issue mask, a beard, and headgear.</div></div>
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: shankster</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Veer_G</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: dbsinh20</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Veer_G</div><div class="ubbcode-body">You could do a lot worse than fielding a regiment of bearded men ... </div></div>
Perhaps, but you'd have a lot of dead soldiers following a chemical/biological attack.
The Navy used to allow beards, until someone figured out they rendered a gas mask ineffective.
Edit: Perhaps they could schedule the good Major for daily chemical warfare training. Nothing like a good whiff of CS to prompt someone to break out that Norelco!
</div></div>
Evidence to the contrary indicates that recent bearded personnel have managed to effect sufficient seals against gas:
http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/-images/2010/03/25/67879/size0-army.mil-67879-2010-03-25-170350.jpg
http://usarmy.vo.llnwd.net/e2/-images/2010/03/25/67876/size0-army.mil-67876-2010-03-25-170351.jpg
http://www.army.mil/article/36339/ </div></div>
Veer,
You obviously have never had to wear respiratory protection for real or you wouldn't even type this stupid shit. You can't grow your man beard and get a decent seal on anything but but a full hood PAPR. Even with a PAPR, you don't get a seal, the hood is just positively pressured. PAPRs are rechargeable battery powered. No good for defense forces in the field. Stick to stating "facts" about stuff you actually know about.
<span style="font-weight: bold">I get your religious "man beard" agenda bias. You're just trying too hard to rationalize it.
Next you're going to tell us your turban offers more protection under a kevlar helmet.
I can't believe our military lets personnel wear a turban for "religous" reasons. Where will it end? I hang a fleshlight off my belt for my religion.</span></div></div>
I would think that a family pack of Ho-Hos on a chain would be more appropriate to your practices, actually. But, whatever, I'm not going to stoop all the way down to the level of your well-documented biases.
What we have here is a matter of truth, or fiction. Either Rattan and others have managed it, and you are wrong, or the government has perpetrated an enormous lie. And if the government has perpetrated a lie, and they have participated in it, they're knowingly going in harm's way without benefit of protection. Is there really an issue here, aside from the fact that some people whose appearance and practices you clearly don't approve of might just have a pair?