Well folks. This Saturday I am heading to my gunsmiths shop to put a deposit down on a build. I already have a donor rifle and have already decided on what stock I'm going to use. What I haven't decided on is caliber. I do however have it narrowed down to either 7mm rem mag or the 7mm practical (a 300wm case necked down to 7mm) is there any real reason why I shouldn't choose a wildcat cartridge for my first precision rifle? Thoughts and suggestions would be helpful. Thanks.
7mm mag or 7mm practical?
- Thread starter prodigalson
- Start date
I apologize. The use of the rifle will be tactical/practical match shooting. Out to 1300 yds (the actual average of all shots is only 750 yds I believe) with a bonus target at 1 mile. It's doubtful that the rifle will see any time in the woods.
Personally, I think 7RM (nevermind 7 practical) is pretty serious overkill for your stated purposes.
It sounds to me like your talking about TVP in Ohio, where I shoot frequently. A 6, 6.5 or 7 pushed by ~45gr of powder is absolutely adequate for this.
I don't think it makes a lot of sense to build a rifle around ONE target you'll encounter during a course of fire.
That said, if I must advise either 7RM or 7P, I say 7RM....begrudgingly.
Even my 284 is has more than enough horsepower for targets out past 1300, though I admit the "mile" shot could use more HP.
284 shehane, never done one and not sure if it is worth the extra work but it is something to look into.
I like the Originals. 300WM for me. I like 7 mag just fine and will certainly do the same job in most cases. I just like pushing heavier projos.
Anybody know what the barrel life on a 7rm is like? Are people getting more life out of the practical?
It is TVP where I will be shooting mostly. And I had a sneaking suspicion that most people would recommend the 7rm. My donor rifle is a magnum,and that's why I'm sticking with a magnum round. Thank you all. Hopefully in a few weeks ill have pictures of the build to post.
Have you looked into 7 Rogue? It's a 7-300WM but with a long neck. It should have better barrel life than the practical. Either way its overkill probably.
Last edited:
I agree with Turbo.
I tried 7mag using 180 grain bullets for a similar match and it was too much gun. 6.5 is a good compromise with less recoil, expense + better barrel life.
Between the two? The Practical! http://www.snipershide.com/shooting...n-rifles/181779-7-300-win-bighorn-action.html
For your purpose I would go 7wsm
For your purpose I would go 7wsm
I shot a friends sendero 7mag last week, it has a muzzle break and kicks like my 6.5 Creedmoor now, not to mention its a boss in the wind, I ordered my action yesterday to start my 7 mag build, but I have zero experience with the 7mm practical
I ran a 7RM as my first match gun caliber. I ran the Amax at first then switched to the 180 smk which was quite a bit better. My barrel went about 1100 rounds and it was toast. On the rebarrel I went with a straight .284. Does everything I need better and at 800+ rounds, it is still rocking right along.
Something to consider for a match rifle using wildcat/expensive brass is, some will get lost during the match. Also, most steel ranges have limits on speed/calibers if that is something that may be in your future.
Something to consider for a match rifle using wildcat/expensive brass is, some will get lost during the match. Also, most steel ranges have limits on speed/calibers if that is something that may be in your future.
I'd only recommend any WSM if your action is custom short/intermediate or long. I got to run out a couple short mags in 700 actions and hated how every single one of them fed. So, 7RM or 300wm would be my advice
^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS, i shot against these guys and i will say this, their rigs are lasers. they won the last intimidator i went to. looking forward to shooting with you at the sniper match turbo
