Anyone have an opinion on this. Is it worth the switch? I have not heard anything conclusive yet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but, the question now is, is it worth the extra $$$$ or not to have a civilian-limited software?
The only difference is the Horus Mil version comes pre loaded with mil type gun profiles (m24, M110 ect..) and under the Acc1st screen it has a function that's not really secret squirrel stuff anymore. Oh and it shipped with Lithium batteries and some subdued cosmetics (black logo is tan ect..) That's it. The ballistic engine is the same as the civilian engine.
The Applied Ballistics Kestrel comes in only one flavor, but its a damn good flavor.
And there you have it, the only difference of any consequence is the Loophole function. So Masked/Ring, is this still as big of an issue as you thought?
And there you have it, the only difference of any consequence is the Loophole function. So Masked/Ring, is this still as big of an issue as you thought? The real point you should be concerned with is with one using G1 and the other G7.
They are two seperate ballistic calculators
other than that I know of no other differences
They are two seperate ballistic calculators
other than that I know of no other differences
The Horus will get you on target just as well as the AB one - just the AB one may be less work to get you on target (my understanding). If you already have a Horus version - especially one you have trued and it works for you - no real reason to change IMO. If your buying new - I would opt for the AB version since the solver is exactly the same in both Military version and Civilian version (and the online as well by the way - along with the mobile phone version of the online calculator). Additionally, you get access to G7 curves and the Litz custom validated data.
And there you have it, the only difference of any consequence is the Loophole function. So Masked/Ring, is this still as big of an issue as you thought? The real point you should be concerned with is with one using G1 and the other G7.
Not to thrash on them but I have seen a lot of Horus haters on the forums. Seem like there is some bad blood floating in the stream.
That aside, I would imagine that if it's first round hits you have to have then the AB will be more accurate due to the ability to describe a more accurate predictive curve. To some people that first round hit is life and death. Do I need it? probably not, but part of the human condition is to always want to go faster and farther and using the best available tech to do so.
Unfortunately the 2 ballistics programs I paid for on the Iphone, are "civilian" and thus missing 1 or 2 minor adjustments.
See, I approach this a little differently.
I want a device that can easily double check my dope.
Cool.
I'm not knocking either Kestrel unit, I haven't used them.
I am knocking the Iphone apps because at 1k+ both ballistics AE and iSnipe are REALLY off.
odd... ive used the AE on ios and shooter on droid out to 1 mile, and it is pretty on for me.. only time i found my numbers way off, was when i found out my scope wasn't tracking right
i would true it at 600, and my 1k was off, i would true it at 1k, and my 600 was off... my 1st clue something was wrong...
I tried out the AB model yesterday for the first time, made first round hits at 500, 800 and 1000yds on 10x10" plates. Money well spent.
Dieselgeek and I ROed together today, while waiting for shooters we got his 260 out, he has his 4500AB trued, and he was making solid hits on a steel Kangaroo target at 1194 yards, I was impressed, wind holds and elevation were spot on, that's gonna cost me money.
I don't know why everyone is acting surprised that the AB version is kicking out good dope, the phone version has been doing it for awhile. People are also doing the same with the Horus version as well. The question is does the AB version give the same or different dope as the Horus? My guess is most won't see a huge difference in firing solutions until they get to 1200 and farther.
Curious, but why is 1200 the magic number? Enlighten us.![]()
It's not a hard mark on the ground but more of a generalization so a "+/-" could preceed it but as mentioned above those shooting trans/sub or even with a caliber capable of 1200 and beyond will probably see larger differing firing solutions spit out between the two at the longer distances.
Dieselgeek and I ROed together today, while waiting for shooters we got his 260 out, he has his 4500AB trued, and he was making solid hits on a steel Kangaroo target at 1194 yards, I was impressed, wind holds and elevation were spot on, that's gonna cost me money.
Your input data must have been good.
I wonder what solvers either use?
The only input I made was the muzzle velocity that I was getting from a magnospeed
. The bullet was in the library and it pulls the environmental data itself. There was no wind at all. Worked well.
AB = point mass solver (AFAIK)
Also, the custom curves from Litz are not Doppler radar. That is WAY too expensive and difficult to obtain. The custom curves are obtained using sound measurements along the trajectory AFAIK. The difference in the Horus and AB units at supersonic are going to be small - but past the transonic barrier is where the custom curves are going to be much closer on the AB to the actual bullet trajectory - hence the 1200 yard reference - but it really is where ever the transonic zone is located on your particular cartridge / altitude etc.
I've shot ELR on more than a few occasions, and 90% of those shots were not in the transonic region. When shooting beyond 1500m I used a set up designed for the task. So you're not solving a beyond transonic problem. I reall have no interest in knowing what my 308 needs for dope at 1 mile.
We have access to much better equipment so the question is really unnecessary.
Now having as accurate a range to say, where your bullet goes below 1200fps is very useful in decision making, but not so much when it comes to actually shooting. If you ever shot on the edge of your bullets max effective range you know even with verified drop your hits are not consistent mainly due to wind, also because of variations in your MV. SD at distance is very important and something the computers are not working with because you don't know until after the shot not before. If there is a 25fps variation between "X" number of rounds, at ELR distances that creates a set of variables the computer doesn't predict.
Me using the AB Kestrel I think it is a worthwhile investment and highly effective tool. But the off the cuff pitches and wrongly repeated thinking does not hit the mark. These tools are starting points to get you close, but there are too many variations to say it works the same for every situation. The shooter, the gun, the ammo, even the scope are wild cards in the equation. You being the biggest one of all.
Saying inside Max Effective will help the computer be as accurate as possible. Outside of that your hit percentages drops off even with verified information, simply because we don't have all the information necessary.
Let's be realistic and not spread information that misleads people. Just because you saw video of a guy hitting a target at 1 mile with a 308 does mean you saw the 36 tries it took to do it.
Why do we care so much about transonic and beyond again, and why is this such a selling point ?
Are we competing in the transonic & beyond region ?
Isnt having a general idea where 1120fps falls and then moving to a load that puts your target well before it enough for 99% of people shooting. If it says 1200 yards is where transonic falls, great, if you plan on shooting that far and you think it matters move to a different bullet. Or just know your hit percentage will fall below 50% or less.
Seems to me it's one of those things that sounds great but at the end of the day is pretty hard to prove beyond anecdotal evidence. Most people are lobbing rounds and are happy if X% hit, as very few are actually recording accurate data beyond transonic. Even less have access too ranges that far.
All these programs are so close to each other the variations are really minor in a practical sense.
if you're the type to chase tech, well then nothing will satisfy you until you get to use the latest one out there.
If the software you are currently using puts you on target there is absolutely no reason to switch. Especially when you consider they use the same base code under the hood. With the Kestrel, there is really only so much computing it can do. So thinking you are getting more horsepower is false. I have yet to see one piece of App style software work better than another beyond personal or practical accuracy standards. It's features and User Interface, if they are doing the same thing with a really similar interface you're not upgrading, but moving laterally.
Going from the Horus Kestrel to AB Kestrel is more a lateral move. There might be some minor differences because we are constantly learning, and the AB is the latest, but you have to ask yourself can you exploit it. Especially if you are already using the Horus, does it put you on target yes or no? If yes, stick with it.
What I think a lot of people are waiting for is to find out if there is an appreciable difference between the Horus and the AB model Kestrel to warrant those who have a Horus kestrel to upgrade to an AB model.