Clinton Assault Weapons Ban talking point meme steering the social media agenda. Is it accurate?

Of course it's a lie, the only question is how they're lying.
I'd guess the definition of "mass shooting" was redefined sometime between 1994 and 2004

Don't argue their irrelevant talking points. It's a losing game even if you somehow win the argument.

1995-1997 were very low years for mass shooting deaths.

So you can say 1994 is year 0, which had a moderate amount of deaths and then compare it to 1995 which had very few deaths.

Then you can say in 2004 we also had VERY few mass shooting deaths....and 2005, 6, 7 had moderate levels.

The main problem is that this issue is statistically insignificant in a short term analysis. And by short term I mean "less than 1000 years".

Could I run a cancer study with 2 patients and then make national policy based on the results of the study? . Fuck no. This is the game the Democrats run....and statists of all kinds like John McCain and that douchebag Crenshaw also play it.

Our nation is a tag team wrestling match, and the two wrestlers that tag each other out are the Dems and the Republicans....and you are the grandma on the mat with the broken hip and smashed in face.

MtnCreek said:

Don't argue their irrelevant talking points. It's a losing game even if you somehow win the argument.

Click to expand...

Exactly....Just call them racists members of the party of the Klan........

Their stats don't factor in the fallout from all their bullshit political agendas.

Small changes to small numbers can yield big percentage changes.

One in year one, two the next year, bam 100% increase.

Inifinty said:

Click to expand...

Like one of my bosses use to say about corporate releases, "Figures can lie and liars can figure"