Official - Precision Rifle Loading on a Dillon XL750

DeathBeforeDismount

DeathBeforeDismount

Hey, give your balls a tug.
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 20, 2021
5,140
6,967
IN YOUR HEAD
#1
The idea of this is to be a new thread dedicated to those who want to learn more or share tips/tricks for loading precision rifle on a Dillion XL750.

I have 2 XL750s along with a bunch of accessories and upgrades on the way. I will document how both machines will be setup, issues that need to be addressed, recommended upgrades and anything else that needs to be mentioned. One machine will be setup with a powder through die so a high end trickler can be used for powder charging and the other will use the dillion powder throw.

The goal is to share information so we can automate as much as the reloading process as possible, reducing reloading time.

Big Thanks for Bobcat Armament for supplying most of the equipment and accessories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kthomas, R_A_W, antunRC and 1 other person
#5
Looking forward to this. I do a lot of my brass prep on my XL750 . I have hand dropped powder from my trickler and seated but mostly do that off the 750 now and seat on my Zero. Haven’t really considered using the Dillon measure on other than pistol and 5.56 though. I’ve gone through many of the popular powder options from Chargemaster that I need to sell to an AT4 that I like but likely will sell as I have a ST Gen2 I like. In line for the new Ingenuity so we’ll see when that comes through.

I use Armanov toolheads / die rings and highly recommend them. I’ve added some other minor upgrades. I can post some pics and more info when I have more time.
 
#9
I made all the upgrades that you listed plus a few more that are unnamed.
Armanov Tool Heads
Armanov Free Float lock rings
Armanov Bearing Cam

I ran this process as a proof of concept when I loaded 1000 M118 clone loads. All the priming was done on press, throw charges with the AutoTrickler, and place bullets on brass by hand.

The idea I had was to use one tool head for brass prep and one for loading - 2 heads per caliber.
Brass Prep Head
Station 1: Universal deprime die
Stage 2: FL Resizing Die with bushing
Stage 3: Mandrel (could switch this to loading die)

Universal Lube Die
I had/have this idea to create a universal lube die (or at least caliber family "universal" 308 & 223 for starters) that would touch both the inside the neck and outside of the brass. There would be minimal pressure on the die so it could be 3D printed - I think - at least for a prototype. The inside would have threads to accept bore mops for applying a thin layer of lube. The die would be lined on the inside with "nib" material - much like a felt tip highlighter or sharpie marker. I spoke with boretech about actual outer diameters of mops and we chatted some about my idea/project. If anyone 3D prints, get back at me! I've done some legwork on this already! In theory, this would move to station 1 and shift everything a step down and keep lube out of the hopper and drop tube.

Loading Head
Station 1: Mandrel (optional) or empty
Station 2: Prime(or prime off press) & Dillon/A419 powder funnel
Station 3: powder check or empty
Station 4: Bullet seater
Station 5: crimp or empty

I have also run some MK262 clone loads through the system by priming on CPS and loading into hopper and dropping with Dillion powder measure. This also worked great but my buddy did the brass processing so I only have a "load head" for that caliber.

I think the real benefit (if speed is your goal) will be to move away from stick powders in favor of StaBall Match. I currently have so much H4350 that it's going to be a while until I make the jump. Looking forward to hearing from other guys loading precision stuff with their 650/750
 
  • Like
Reactions: FWoo45, Herb Stoner and st1650
#11
You dont need a Lube Die. You use Lanolin/alch on the brass before you dump into case feeder for Prep toolhead. Then it gets washed off before the loading cycle.

Ive talked to a bunch of people and they claim the Armanov toolheads and lock rings are a waste of money. I ended up getting Joffer toolheads. Still bought a bunch of armanov upgrades like the primer adjuster, powder disconect and powder measure dial. They ran both and saw zero difference in runout, SD or ES. One is running a full 750 autodrive setup with all the sensors.

Staball powders are garbage. That is why one 750 will be setup with a powder through die to get fed by the supertricklers ( +_ .-02gr) and one will be dedicated with dillion powder throw for .223 PRS practice loads. If I can get 15 SD with the practice loads it will be good enough to bang MOA steel out to distance and do dot drills. H4350 is the perfect powder IMO and its all I plan to run for a long time in anything from 6GT to 300wsm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Travis224
#12
The idea of a lube die was so I didn’t have all that lanolin mess in the hopper and drop tube to deal with. I’ve made some before and agree that it works but it’s still pretty damn messy. I’d imagine after a few hundred cases passing through, the hopper would get gunky, which would transfer to “ready to load” brass and maybe start to degrade the hoppers ability to function. If you have information otherwise, I’m happy the hear it.

I think Joffer sells on Amazon. I imagine anything is better than the OEM heads. I did Armanov based on other people’s recommendations. Armanov Floating lock rings work fine, but probably no real difference down range and they’re not real expensive.

I hadn’t heard that the staball match was garbage. Like I said, I have a ton of 4350 so it’ll be a while for me at the rate I get to shoot these days.

The powder through die was capable of the SD you’re after on my setup. I don’t have my data in front of me, but 15SD sounds about right. Good enough for practice.
 
#13
  • Like
Reactions: RegionRat, Kadams1563, impactaddict and 1 other person
#17
This is my next project and I’m super excited. I have an amp mate and it’s amazing, coupling that with a 750 and a bunch of different tool heads I feel like I’m gonna save hours of time.
 
#18
impactaddict said:
I’d imagine after a few hundred cases passing through, the hopper would get gunky, which would transfer to “ready to load” brass and maybe start to degrade the hoppers ability to function. If you have information otherwise, I’m happy the hear it.
Click to expand...
This is true, but easy to clean up every several thousand rounds or whenever it looks like enough to bother.
It only takes a few moments to clean up the case feeder and tube. Only additional comment would be not to let it sit for months or uncovered, dust and age will make it take longer to clean, so do it when before the lube residues get old and don't let dust accumulate in the hopper.

+1 on the Index Cam Block with Adjustable Primer Stop. It really helps tune the priming depth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LR1845
#22
entirelycrimson.com

Progressive Powder Funnel

Directly funneling pre-measured powder into cases on your Dillon Precision progressive press. Change between the Dillon Powder Measure and this Funnel with little to no adjustment. Please watch the video showing basic setup and use as well as considerations to see if this is the right tool for...
entirelycrimson.com

MKM Machining used to make a printed adapter to use their printed funnel on a Dillon Powder through die, but I can't find it on their website

The Lyman Extended Powder Charge Die might work as a solid drop tube, I'm looking for some kind of 7/8"-14 reducer w/ through hole that could be bored out. Someone with a printer could just print a threaded bushing or see if the EC funnel will work on top
 
Last edited:
#24
Looking at some post-match brass with dented necks & debating whether to pre-process them with a mandrel or just run it through the FL/neck bushing die & ignore any lack of concentricity...

Rather than run a universal decap for the first station on the prep toolhead, why not modify a Lee Collet Die by replacing the collet with a spacer bushing & run it on Station 1 in a free float lock ring? That way you decap while slightly ironing out neck dents before running through a neck bushing.

The spacer bushing needs to have an OD greater than 0.670" in order to be retained in the die body. The collets on the three I have are about 0.680" OD x 0.535" ID, but length varies (presumably by caliber, although these things are machined pretty rough). Didn't locate my .308win, but the spacer for a 6.5cm will need to be ~1.285" long, while my .223 will need to ~1.210" long. My mandrel diameters are .261" for 6.5cm and .219" for .223, but you can order an oversized mandrel if you wanted a diameter closer to the neck ID on fired brass. The only other issue is you'd have to reduce the diameter of the 0.065" decap pin to 0.055" for some SRP (won't fit my Lapua SRP, fits FC SRP fine).

I haven't tested this & maybe someone else already has.
 
#25
DeathBeforeDismount said:
-6.5CM and 6GT with H4350 and 2 Supertricklers with the one machine
-Dedicated .223 with Dillon powder throw on the other machine. Will start with TAC and see how it goes. Would love to use XBR8202 but its unobtainable.
Click to expand...
Tac throws very consistent in my Dillon measure, and is a great powder for 50-77gr bullets in 223. I find tac behaves more linear in regards to pressure build, than 8208. It definitely throws better, and is just as temp stable as 8208.
 
#26
R_A_W said:
Looking at some post-match brass with dented necks & debating whether to pre-process them with a mandrel or just run it through the FL/neck bushing die & ignore any lack of concentricity...
Click to expand...
How bad are the necks dented? What is your current head setup? I think these two answers will help determine if it is worth testing or if it will just be a waste of time.
 
#27
Very few are dented badly enough that the neck bushing won't effectively resolve it... but any brass dented worse than that on the right (pic) will often still have a measurable dent post neck sizing. I haven't checked post-mandrel, but will this weekend. Can I shoot the difference? Nope.

Anyways, I'm still getting set up. I have these Lee collet dies just collecting dust, so why not use them in station 1 instead of the universal decap for the cartridges that I'm using 2 separate toolheads on (prep & load)?

IMG_5898.jpeg
 
#28
R_A_W said:
Very few are dented badly enough that the neck bushing won't effectively resolve it... but any brass dented worse than that on the right (pic) will often still have a measurable dent post neck sizing. I haven't checked post-mandrel, but will this weekend. Can I shoot the difference? Nope.

Anyways, I'm still getting set up. I have these Lee collet dies just collecting dust, so why not use them in station 1 instead of the universal decap for the cartridges that I'm using 2 separate toolheads on (prep & load)?
Click to expand...
I personally run a mandrel on station 5 after I full length size with a bushing die on station 4. If any of my case mouths are still slightly out of round the mandrel fixes it. Not sure if I have seen someone run a mandrel before running the bushing die, seems counterintuitive.

Regardless, you can run it on station 1 but why not just run it after sizing it with the bushing die?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FF05, LR1845 and Kadams1563
#29
Just to be clear, I'm not recommending relocating the mandrel, I'm suggesting adding an additional mandrel prior to FL/neck sizing just to iron out dents (but without stretching the neck) & ensure the neck bushing is applying force evenly to the neck.

I tested just hillbilly tested this by heavily denting 3 pieces of 1x fired/annealed Norma brass and then processing them. I annealed, lubed with lanolin/alcohol, FL sized with a 0.290" neck bushing (not 0.291" stated in pic), then finished with a 0.262" mandrel. This normally gets me 0.002" interference on this Norma with 0.0145" neck wall thickness.

I don't think you'll get consistent neck interference on severely dented brass by just sizing with a neck bushing then following up with a mandrel. On the most severely dented #3 brass, the OD ranges from 0.291" to 0.294" after neck sizing & mandrelling (pictured with calipers). The moderately dented #2 piece has about 0.001" spread in OD. The least dented #1 brass seems to have fully resolved after mandrel, showing a uniform OD. Something like the #1 dent is typical of what I've seen after a few matches, presumably from stepping on a piece or two while moving during a stage.

IMG_5905.jpeg
IMG_5908.jpeg

IMG_5909.jpeg
IMG_5910.jpeg


All that said, I don't think I've answered much of anything & this really needs to be better tested (e.g. with an AMP press). Until then... there are open stations on a brass prep toolhead, so why not just preempt the issue?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RegionRat
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

806guns
New to me Dillon XL750
Replies
2
Views
170
Herb Stoner
Herb Stoner
maximusdecimusmeridius
Which Dillon or Apex for Training / Precision 223 and 9mm
Replies
8
Views
316
pmclaine
pmclaine
Devo10ate
Where am I going wrong? .308 hunting load and general powder questions
Replies
12
Views
524
Snuby642
Snuby642
J
New to reloading
Replies
42
Views
1K
Vinootz
Vinootz
C
6mm Creedmoor H4350 Large Rifle Magnum Primers load data
Replies
8
Views
858
MarkyMark007
MarkyMark007
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts