BSA Royal Featherlight

VJJPunisher

VJJPunisher

Necromancing the stone
Full Member
Minuteman
Apr 30, 2010
4,297
1,209
prison purse
#1
Stumbled into this thing, didn’t know much about them but knew a bit about the old BSA guns from WW2. I knew this thing was cool so I got it. After getting it I learned a little bit more of the demise of BSA in the early 70’s. I like old classic wood stocked guns and this thing really makes me think of the Remington model 30 express. This one is a .243 which I guess they were also in 30’06. It weighs 6 lbs and some change. Really cool old gun thought some here would like it and probably know a lot more about them

IMG_7062.jpeg
IMG_7065.jpeg
IMG_7066.jpeg
IMG_7064.jpeg
IMG_7063.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: sandwarrior, camocorvette, MarshallDodge and 12 others
#8
RPN said:
View attachment 8427783

Probably THE classic NZ government culling book has a 243 BSA on the cover - they were the professionals rifle of choice through the 60's and well into the 70's, and are still popular on the 2nd hand market.

Not something to build a 26" bull barrelled 300SAUM on, but for a light weight hunting rifle they are superb.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that, that’s really cool
 
#9
sirhrmechanic said:
Love the “schnabel” forend. Great classic 1960’s lines. Sleek and pretty. You done good.

Don’t underestimate Birmingham guns. May not have the finish of a London best but they were world class rifles. At a time when British guns were seen around the planet a lot more than American ones!

Sirhr
Click to expand...

I agree, pretty lines and I love an old classic style gun. We were just teasing about it being gross. I’ve been around a gun or two enough to know this rifle is really quite beautiful, and built really well
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirhrmechanic
#10
VJJPunisher said:
I agree, pretty lines and I love an old classic style gun. We were just teasing about it being gross. I’ve been around a gun or two enough to know this rifle is really quite beautiful, and built really well
Click to expand...

If it were mine… I’d do a couple of things… I’d remove the white line spacers on the stock. I’d strip the “blonde” finish and recut/deepen checkering. And I’d restain a rich deep walnut… and refinish in Warthog Oil (Purdeys finish.)

That would turn that gun into an utter English classic!

Cheers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: camocorvette
#16
On an aside, is there any Lyman peep collectors on here? It’s drilled and tapped for what I believe to be a Lyman. Information on these old English rifles is few and far between, can’t even determine an exact year of manufacture. I was looking around and thought it might be cool to have a period right Lyman rear it but holy fuck that rabbit hole is daunting with changes to this or that component over the years, apparently there are collectors of just old peep sights. I believe it needs a Lyman 57WJS but I could be smoking rocks
IMG_7070.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: camocorvette, Average guy and FWoo45
#19
Beautiful rifle @VJJPunisher. Please ignore the uninformed comments and keep it as original as possible. I understand that they still have the tooling and there have been repeated attempts by the NZ distributor to reintroduce these rifles. Given that the brand has been part of the Gamo empire for a while, I doubt that it will ever happen. What is the hole spacing for the peep sight?
 
#22
VJJPunisher said:
On an aside, is there any Lyman peep collectors on here? It’s drilled and tapped for what I believe to be a Lyman. Information on these old English rifles is few and far between, can’t even determine an exact year of manufacture. I was looking around and thought it might be cool to have a period right Lyman rear it but holy fuck that rabbit hole is daunting with changes to this or that component over the years, apparently there are collectors of just old peep sights. I believe it needs a Lyman 57WJS but I could be smoking rocks
View attachment 8428215
Click to expand...
I like it even more now. I have an old walnut stocked Savage 110, 30-06 that I installed a Lyman peep on. I'll have to get some pics up.

Mike
 
  • Like
Reactions: VJJPunisher
#25
@RTH1800 knows alot about Iron sights I believe
VJJPunisher said:
On an aside, is there any Lyman peep collectors on here? It’s drilled and tapped for what I believe to be a Lyman. Information on these old English rifles is few and far between, can’t even determine an exact year of manufacture. I was looking around and thought it might be cool to have a period right Lyman rear it but holy fuck that rabbit hole is daunting with changes to this or that component over the years, apparently there are collectors of just old peep sights. I believe it needs a Lyman 57WJS but I could be smoking rocks
View attachment 8428215
Click to expand...
 
#26
www.snipershide.com

I want a nice old Mannlicher-Schoenauer!

Not so much interested in the military version but more so a old custom. Just one of those rifles I've always wanted but didn't get around to yet. Proud owners/ex please comment about them, but especially I'd really like to see some pics! I'm thinking of 6.5x54 or 257 Roberts to keep the...
www.snipershide.com www.snipershide.com

Might be some good sight info in here!

Sirhr

PS. Off to see Mr. John Rigby…. This could get spendy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZG47A and VJJPunisher
#29
That is going to be beautiful!

BTW they were so overwhelmed/ Linder spaced at Rigby, their “drying room”’for spectacularly executed stocks was a closet near the showroom. Perfect setup… and the stock finish it produces is world class!!

But they bought a new premises and are very excited about moving.

That said, the workshops and even showroom are amazing. Total Edwardian workshop space and cozy gun room in the finest tradition. And a new apprentice program. It was amazing and I am glad I got to see it before they go “upscale” in a more modern building nearby!

I wouldn’t trade today’s visit for the Poshest showroom in London!

Cheers! Sirhr
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZG47A
#33
VJJPunisher said:
It’s .600 even, best I can measure
Click to expand...
Checked my PH5 sight and the hole-spacing is smaller BUT … I pulled out my copy of Nick Strobel’s book:
Old Gunsights & Rifle Scopes: Identification & Price Guide.
I found the crucial information on p. 245.
Marlin/Ballard, Remington and Winchester all used 0.600 hole spacing and 6-48 screws for receiver sights. Hole spacing for rudimentary receiver sights like the Lyman 21/36 used on the Winchester Models 1886 and 1895 is a separate story.
It doesn’t matter what you choose, whether it be a Lyman 48, Lyman 57 or a Redfield. The young fellas won’t know the difference and the older shooters have all learnt the value of practicality. Just avoid the taller target type models that are made for 500 to 1,000/1,200 yard shooting.
Have fun and don’t forget the hunting pics … even if the first ones only show dead paper targets😁!
 
  • Like
Reactions: camocorvette and Modoc
#34
ZG47A said:
Checked my PH5 sight and the hole-spacing is smaller BUT … I pulled out my copy of Nick Strobel’s book:
Old Gunsights & Rifle Scopes: Identification & Price Guide.
I found the crucial information on p. 245.
Marlin/Ballard, Remington and Winchester all used 0.600 hole spacing and 6-48 screws for receiver sights. Hole spacing for rudimentary receiver sights like the Lyman 21/36 used on the Winchester Models 1886 and 1895 is a separate story.
It doesn’t matter what you choose, whether it be a Lyman 48, Lyman 57 or a Redfield. The young fellas won’t know the difference and the older shooters have all learnt the value of practicality. Just avoid the taller target type models that are made for 500 to 1,000/1,200 yard shooting.
Have fun and don’t forget the hunting pics … even if the first ones only show dead paper targets😁!
Click to expand...

Awsome, thanks for the info, I think I have a Lyman 57 coming from a friend to try on it
 
#39
ZG47A said:
Checked my PH5 sight and the hole-spacing is smaller BUT … I pulled out my copy of Nick Strobel’s book:
Old Gunsights & Rifle Scopes: Identification & Price Guide.
I found the crucial information on p. 245.
Marlin/Ballard, Remington and Winchester all used 0.600 hole spacing and 6-48 screws for receiver sights. Hole spacing for rudimentary receiver sights like the Lyman 21/36 used on the Winchester Models 1886 and 1895 is a separate story.
It doesn’t matter what you choose, whether it be a Lyman 48, Lyman 57 or a Redfield. The young fellas won’t know the difference and the older shooters have all learnt the value of practicality. Just avoid the taller target type models that are made for 500 to 1,000/1,200 yard shooting.
Have fun and don’t forget the hunting pics … even if the first ones only show dead paper targets😁!
Click to expand...

Lyman 48 fit the hole spacing and contour perfectly

IMG_7137.jpeg

IMG_7136.jpeg


Going to leave the base permanatley mounted, whilst using the scope

IMG_7139.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirhrmechanic, Average guy, camocorvette and 2 others
#40
  • Like
Reactions: VJJPunisher
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Overwatch260
M40 build thread
Replies
13
Views
545
03RN
03RN
Habu64
Info needed, .300 savage and 250-3000
Replies
24
Views
919
sandwarrior
sandwarrior
fpgt72
Not too bad for an old commie, and an old man behind the wheel.
Replies
10
Views
412
sirhrmechanic
sirhrmechanic
S
Firearms WTS: Remington 700 300 win mag Rifle Build
Replies
10
Views
1K
STI_1911_Guy
S
91Eunozs
Movie Theater Sexy Beast
Replies
1
Views
441
Sniff
Sniff
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts