Watch the gun grabbers go after any rifle with a scope on it next because it’s a s****r r***e.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Post any issues in the thread below or reach out directly to support!
View thread Contact supportI am surprised this hasn't already happened. It's just a matter of time before someone does it.Just wait until there is someone who pulls a Ukraine move, and drops something interesting from a drone onto a crowd.
shouldnt drones be banned as being weapons of war?I am surprised this hasn't already happened. It's just a matter of time before someone does it.
By banning everything, just in case.How do they enforce this?
'No foul' , as my LRF reported the training target at 999 yard.How do they enforce this?
R
They''ll be no restrictions on them till one is actually used in a serious crime. The only exception presently, to my knowledge, is the limit of space/distance they can be flown in near D.C.shouldnt drones be banned as being weapons of war?
Cheap Chinese range finder = 10 years in club fed.'No foul' , as my LRF reported the training target at 999 yard.
.
that's the chance, being a poor takes .Cheap Chinese range finder = 10 years in club fed.
They are easy to over come.They''ll be no restrictions on them till one is actually used in a serious crime. The only exception presently, to my knowledge, is the limit of space/distance they can be flown in near D.C.
That just empowers it.Lawfare needs to come with financial consequences.
Watch the gun grabbers go after any rifle with a scope on it next because it’s a s****r r***e.
There are already lots of restrictions including tracking of the drone and the operator.They''ll be no restrictions on them till one is actually used in a serious crime. The only exception presently, to my knowledge, is the limit of space/distance they can be flown in near D.C.
If they are scared this type of training will be use against them, they don't have a clue. They would be much better off by stopping all chemistry classes, computer & RF teachings. Shelf items & a brain will always trump a hard dick with a gun, no matter how good one is with that tool.
VT has already tried to ban “training”.
It won’t stand in court as training is a first amendment issue. Can’t suppress the transfer of knowledge or ideas.
But that doesn’t mean the lawfare wont cost millions to defend a fundamental right.
Lawfare needs to come with financial consequences. Like disbarment, financial penalties, jail, tribunals and guillotine.
Just ‘sayin.
Sirhr
ITAR says hello.
Take a drive up to a mountain.....I shoot a 308, so I dont give a shit....
Which will be like having every gun registered.... while the bad guys steal them and murder for sport while the legal citizen is harassed at every turn.There are already lots of restrictions including tracking of the drone and the operator.
have always been afraid that the the dems would use the same process they use to call and AR an "assault rifle". use to call any standard hunting rifle a "sniper rifle" and carry on from there. wouldn't surprise me at all.Well I guess we will have to start just shooting our harmless 22 rimfire rifles out to 250yds........
Watch the gun grabbers go after any rifle with a scope on it next because it’s a s****r r***e.
The imported snowturds got Big Ivy shut down here. Which is ridiculous as it was there long before the housing developments, and on private property. If they can do it here in the country, they'll try to do it everywhere.
That's always been my issue with people that move here. They leave whatever flat, featureless shithole they came from to come live in the mountains, then they want us to change our ways to suit them. And they want strip malls and Starsucks on every corner. I don't remember sending you a fucking invitation. Feel free to pack your shit and go back where you came from since it was so great.
.300 H&H mag. The guys shoulder had to be hamburger…From 1938.
![]()
.300 H&H mag. The guys shoulder had to be hamburger…
I have no quarrel with the majority’s point about “extremely long distances[.]” That
circumstance bears directly on one of the limitations that the Supreme Court has recited as to the
Second Amendment’s scope—namely that the arms be kept or borne “in case of confrontation”
or self-defense. Bruen, 597 U.S. at 32. Confrontations typically do not begin at distances of
1,000 yards (i.e., more than a half-mile), which means that training at that distance is not self-
evidently necessary for purposes of confrontation or self defense. And I agree that the plaintiffs
have not explained why training at that distance is necessary for those purposes.
Take a drive up to a mountain.....
and go for 1200.