Rifle Scopes Vortex Strike Eagle 5-25, an Honest Review

BigJohn141

Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Nov 18, 2011
795
260
Timnath, Co
Just wanted to throw up a quick review for those looking at more budge friendly scopes. There are a lot on the market and it can be a daunting task to sort through them all. I was in search for something to run on my rifle until my higher end glass shows up. I scouted around for a while and found a great deal on a never mounted Strike Eagle 5-25 here in the PX. It arrived yesterday and so I mounted it up in a 1.26” ARC M-Brace mount and headed to the indoor range to sight in. For those wondering, the 1.26” mount makes the bell easily clear a Proof comp contour barrel on a 20 moa rail with room to spare. Nothing major to report from the indoor range, sighted in easy enough with no weird occurrences, seemed to track well. The range is in the basement of the facility and is not super bright but I had no problems seeing the reticle dot on the target at 100 yards. I have had this issue in the past with lesser quality scopes and had to kick on the illumination to a low level. This morning I headed to the outdoor 1000 yard range to true my dope and see how the scope would perform. It was an almost perfect morning for shooting at around 45 degrees, slight overcast, and an 11 o’clock wind at 3 mph. The 1000 yard range at the facility starts at 400 yards and has multiple size and shaped targets every 100 yards out to 1000. The 400 yard targets were white so I dialed in the correct elevation and went to work. I will say the parallax adjustment was slightly more stiff than I would like and it may loosen up with use but not overly hard by any stretch. The marked parallax ranges were close but not exact as common with most scopes. The magnification adjustment was surprisingly excellent, smooth and easy to move. Both the elevation and windage turrets were smooth, had decent tactile clicks to them, and were spaced well. It was easy to move .1 mil without worrying about overrunning the intended stopping place, all lines aligned properly. The turret locking feature is nice if you are looking for that, I kept the windage locked almost all day. The impact on the 400 yard white target was right where it was expected, 500 yard yellow targets were the same, holding wind on both. The 600 yard is where I started to see the loss of contrast and clarity show up. These particular targets were a medium red color so picking out the black impact on them was a little difficult. When shooting a target with previous hits on it, I could not tell exactly which one was mine. At this range I could start to pick up bullet trace for a brief moment. The color pattern repeated with white 700, yellow 800, and red 900. Impacts were easily spotted again on white and yellow but a little harder on red. The 900 yard red targets had little to no impacts on the smaller ones so I chose to shoot those. They were easier to spot on clean plates but still did not greatly stand out. The elevation was .1 low at 800 yards from the ballistic calculator output but I account that to the colder temps from when I chronographed the rounds. After adjustment, it was spot on again. At 1000, I decided to dial the wind, a whole .3 mil, and see how it acted. With the adjusted velocity, it was a first round center punch on a 10” square and the subsequent rounds were right with it. Impacts were easily spotted on the white plate. At the extended ranges, the bullet trace was more prominent but still not as clear as higher end glass. This could partly be accounted to atmospheric conditions possibly. After that I did some positional practice on the closer targets, dialing back and forth with everything tracking as it should. Before packing up, I sent the last few round at the 1000 yard square again with expected results. There was some light mirage starting to show up but nothing that would distort the target. To sum up my experience with the Strike Eagle, I can say I am happy with the performance of the scope and will probably hold on to it for a while. It will more than likely find a home on my rimfire for practicing. As mentioned above, I find the contrast lacking on darker colored targets and you will notice the image is less crisp if you are use to higher end glass. I decided to not use the included throw lever since the magnification rings is so smooth and I find the lever is large enough to block the view of the turrets causing you to come off the rifle. I will be running it next weekend under comp use so I will update if I find anything troublesome. As long as it holds up mechanically, I would recommend it if you are looking in the $500-$700 price range.
4407C163-34F2-4C96-98E4-35FEDC536569.jpeg

18581A7C-E389-45C9-B19F-326395FFCDB2.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the nice wright up I have been looking at this scope to put on a B-14R I got about a month ago, sounds like it might fit the bill just right for the 22lr, I have a gen 1 razor on it now and would like to have the lower 15 yd. parallax for the 22. just wonder how it would do on small targets in shadows.
 
Great review! I picked one up a few weeks ago and am impressed for the price point. They are really close to the PST Gen 2 scopes (I've got several) and not in the league of Razor Gen 2 scope, but for the money, the Strike Eagle is a great value.
 
Great review! I picked one up a few weeks ago and am impressed for the price point. They are really close to the PST Gen 2 scopes (I've got several) and not in the league of Razor Gen 2 scope, but for the money, the Strike Eagle is a great value.
I don’t have buyers remorse at all with it. It’s going to be rather chilly on Saturday if the comp still goes, around 0 degrees in the morning with snow. I’m interested to see if anything gets hard to turn in those types of conditions.
 
I’m very happy with mine for the price.
It has a pretty good track record for function and mechanics. Not a lot of bad reviews as of late.
Same here! Mine only cost me $99... 🤣

The scope it replaced was discontinued, and had an issue, and so Vortex let me upgrade to the SE for $100 bill. Not bad considering the scope I sent back was bought 10 years prior, so I had written that expense off long ago. 😂
 
So a quick update from today. I went out this morning and shot a local Wyoming match from 200 out past 1000. It was a trying day with temps starting off around 15 degrees and full value winds at 16mph with gusts over 20mph. To say it was a little chilly would be a gross understatement. The Strike Eagle held its own, even though you could tell the cold was going to work on moving parts. Magnification and parallax was harder to turn but still usable, turret clicks were softer than before. It was a day of mixed dialing and holdovers with partly sunny, bright conditions and snow on the ground. Admittedly, this was my first time shooting a comp in almost a decade and my very first full positional match. Again the Strike Eagle did quite a decent job and ran solid through the day. I never found myself struggling to get a decent sight picture and seeing hits was more than acceptable as well. I ran the scope around 15-20 power all day to help with perceived wobble so I can’t really speak to how it is maxed out in those situations. I really don’t have much bad to say about it so far. Every time I have been to the range, I haven’t had to deal with heavy mirage so I’m interested to see it’s performance there. I never expected it to replace upper mid to high end glass and still don’t. With that said, I don’t think my scores would’ve been any better running a higher end scope today. For someone looking for decent budget glass and some PRS style shooting, I still recommend it.
 
Just wanted to throw up a quick review for those looking at more budge friendly scopes. There are a lot on the market and it can be a daunting task to sort through them all. I was in search for something to run on my rifle until my higher end glass shows up. I scouted around for a while and found a great deal on a never mounted Strike Eagle 5-25 here in the PX. It arrived yesterday and so I mounted it up in a 1.26” ARC M-Brace mount and headed to the indoor range to sight in. For those wondering, the 1.26” mount makes the bell easily clear a Proof comp contour barrel on a 20 moa rail with room to spare. Nothing major to report from the indoor range, sighted in easy enough with no weird occurrences, seemed to track well. The range is in the basement of the facility and is not super bright but I had no problems seeing the reticle dot on the target at 100 yards. I have had this issue in the past with lesser quality scopes and had to kick on the illumination to a low level. This morning I headed to the outdoor 1000 yard range to true my dope and see how the scope would perform. It was an almost perfect morning for shooting at around 45 degrees, slight overcast, and an 11 o’clock wind at 3 mph. The 1000 yard range at the facility starts at 400 yards and has multiple size and shaped targets every 100 yards out to 1000. The 400 yard targets were white so I dialed in the correct elevation and went to work. I will say the parallax adjustment was slightly more stiff than I would like and it may loosen up with use but not overly hard by any stretch. The marked parallax ranges were close but not exact as common with most scopes. The magnification adjustment was surprisingly excellent, smooth and easy to move. Both the elevation and windage turrets were smooth, had decent tactile clicks to them, and were spaced well. It was easy to move .1 mil without worrying about overrunning the intended stopping place, all lines aligned properly. The turret locking feature is nice if you are looking for that, I kept the windage locked almost all day. The impact on the 400 yard white target was right where it was expected, 500 yard yellow targets were the same, holding wind on both. The 600 yard is where I started to see the loss of contrast and clarity show up. These particular targets were a medium red color so picking out the black impact on them was a little difficult. When shooting a target with previous hits on it, I could not tell exactly which one was mine. At this range I could start to pick up bullet trace for a brief moment. The color pattern repeated with white 700, yellow 800, and red 900. Impacts were easily spotted again on white and yellow but a little harder on red. The 900 yard red targets had little to no impacts on the smaller ones so I chose to shoot those. They were easier to spot on clean plates but still did not greatly stand out. The elevation was .1 low at 800 yards from the ballistic calculator output but I account that to the colder temps from when I chronographed the rounds. After adjustment, it was spot on again. At 1000, I decided to dial the wind, a whole .3 mil, and see how it acted. With the adjusted velocity, it was a first round center punch on a 10” square and the subsequent rounds were right with it. Impacts were easily spotted on the white plate. At the extended ranges, the bullet trace was more prominent but still not as clear as higher end glass. This could partly be accounted to atmospheric conditions possibly. After that I did some positional practice on the closer targets, dialing back and forth with everything tracking as it should. Before packing up, I sent the last few round at the 1000 yard square again with expected results. There was some light mirage starting to show up but nothing that would distort the target. To sum up my experience with the Strike Eagle, I can say I am happy with the performance of the scope and will probably hold on to it for a while. It will more than likely find a home on my rimfire for practicing. As mentioned above, I find the contrast lacking on darker colored targets and you will notice the image is less crisp if you are use to higher end glass. I decided to not use the included throw lever since the magnification rings is so smooth and I find the lever is large enough to block the view of the turrets causing you to come off the rifle. I will be running it next weekend under comp use so I will update if I find anything troublesome. As long as it holds up mechanically, I would recommend it if you are looking in the $500-$700 price range.
View attachment 7812028
View attachment 7812029

I went with the PST II. Reason being the QC on the Strike Eagle is crap. Close to
50% are poorly assembled with misaligned reticle etc. so either get a great one or a really shitty one friend of mine had three of them they were great the other one useless, that said if you do get a good one it’s pretty decent aside from the fact that I think the zero stop system with little Ring is going to half assed though than that if you do some shopping you can find them up in Boxford really reasonable prices
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrandeJake
I tool a chance on the Venom last year. Have half a dozen Vipers. It's like a Viper at half price.....maybe better. Zero issues with it thus far.
 
I went with the PST II. Reason being the QC on the Strike Eagle is crap. Close to
50% are poorly assembled with misaligned reticle etc. so either get a great one or a really shitty one friend of mine had three of them they were great the other one useless, that said if you do get a good one it’s pretty decent aside from the fact that I think the zero stop system with little Ring is going to half assed though than that if you do some shopping you can find them up in Boxford really reasonable prices
That's only 25%...
 
That's only 25%...
The 50% was from a published article, not the bad ones I mentioned, and At any rate things like that are part of the reason some people don’t take Vortex seriously, If you want respect you can have issues anywhere in your line as it just brings a cloud over their high end products And prevent them from ever being a night force or a leupold, just as a Corvette will never be a Ferrari as you can’t drop 150,000 on a car, only to sit in the service lane behind a malibu.
 
I tool a chance on the Venom last year. Have half a dozen Vipers. It's like a Viper at half price.....maybe better. Zero issues with it thus far.

Same here, i picked my pst II 5-25x50 brand new open box for $650, then tripped watched sail out of my hand hit the tile and damaged 2 of the turrets, so i call vortex to see how much it would be to fix it and found out that not only are they warranted for life but they told me you could literally tell us you threw it against the wall and still no charge to repair. So they sent me an email with an overnight FedEx label fixed it in one day and overnighted it back to shipping alone is 160 bucks round-trip so you really can’t knock their service
 
The 50% was from a published article, not the bad ones I mentioned, and At any rate things like that are part of the reason some people don’t take Vortex seriously, If you want respect you can have issues anywhere in your line as it just brings a cloud over their high end products And prevent them from ever being a night force or a leupold, just as a Corvette will never be a Ferrari as you can’t drop 150,000 on a car, only to sit in the service lane behind a malibu.
Can you share the article?
Since the SE has been out I don’t remember 50% failure rate. Early on they had some bugs to work out but the track record now is on par or better than the pst 2.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FuhQ
I had this scope on my tikka 22, but then needed glass for my tikka 223, so I switched it over and bought the venom for my 22.. both are great for their purpose.

I couldnt bring myself to buy a 3rd MK5, which is what I wanted. Those sit on the 308's
 
The 50% was from a published article, not the bad ones I mentioned, and At any rate things like that are part of the reason some people don’t take Vortex seriously, If you want respect you can have issues anywhere in your line as it just brings a cloud over their high end products And prevent them from ever being a night force or a leupold, just as a Corvette will never be a Ferrari as you can’t drop 150,000 on a car, only to sit in the service lane behind a malibu.
You’ve obviously never been in the industry… Leupold was one of the most common brands I used to have to send back for repair/replace. Their CS was always excellent, but their scopes were not so much (20 years ago). I’ve sent back NF, S&B, Trijicon, and pretty much all the top brands for warranty work and/or defects. Anything man made has the propensity for defects. Don’t think that just because a scope’s price reaches a certain point that they are immune to issues.
 
Like many new products everyone raved about them for awhile and then the reality started to creep in and you start to hear about how people are not nearly as impressed with them as when they were new. Optically most now find them disappointing. This happens all the with whatever the flavor of the year optic is. Everyone raves about how good the new kid on the block is but after awhile people become much more critical of most of them. I suspect there's a lot of shiny rock syndrome and industry supporters/sponsored shooters talking up new products for sales. It also doesn't help that when they first came out you could snag them under $500 and now they are selling pretty much everywhere for $800. Doesn't sound like that much, but once you break $600-$700 the competition gets pretty stiff in the say $700-$1000 price point.

The only reason I'd buy a Strike Eagle would be if I was using it for a 22 build and not planning to use the zero stop. Using the zero stop costs you a ton of elevation travel, making it basically the same as a PST Gen 2, beyond that the only plus is it has a 15 yard parallax. Optically I've owned several PST GEN 2's and 3 Strike Eagles, and not one of the Strike Eagles could keep up, and the PST Gen 2 isn't exactly top of the line glass. I would never even consider paying the $800 they want for them currently, they probably should slot into the $400-500 range.

It's not garbage, and it will do the job, but it's seriously overpriced for what it is these days. Esp. when you can snag something like the Burris XTR 3 for $1000, or Bushnell Match Pro ED for $700, or PST Gen 2's for $700
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OkieMike
Like many new products everyone raved about them for awhile and then the reality started to creep in and you start to hear about how people are not nearly as impressed with them as when they were new. Optically most now find them disappointing. This happens all the with whatever the flavor of the year optic is. Everyone raves about how good the new kid on the block is but after awhile people become much more critical of most of them. I suspect there's a lot of shiny rock syndrome and industry supporters/sponsored shooters talking up new products for sales.

The only reason I'd buy a Strike Eagle would be if I was using it for a 22 build and not planning to use the zero stop. Using the zero stop costs you a ton of elevation travel, making it basically the same as a PST Gen 2, beyond that the only plus is it has a 15 yard parallax. Optically I've owned several PST GEN 2's and 3 Strike Eagles, and not one of the Strike Eagles could keep up, and the PST Gen 2 isn't exactly top of the line glass. I would never even consider paying the $800 they want for them currently, they probably should slot into the $400-500 range.

It's not garbage, and it will do the job, but it's seriously overpriced for what it is these days. Esp. when you can snag something like the Burris XTR 3 for $1000, or Bushnell Match Pro ED for $700, or PST Gen 2's for $700
Thanks for the insight.

Mike
 
I will add my 2 cents to this thread. One of my bucket lists is to go to 1 mile. I normally shoot 1000 yard fclass and use a nxs 8-32 that has 1/8 moa clicks. This gives me only 40 moa of elevation. For my 6x47L with 115 dtacs i needed like 69 moa of elevation. So i bought a strike Eagle for 500 used. Put it in burris signature rings and put the inserts in to set the 100 yard zero at less than 1 revolution off the bottom. That gave me 90 moa to dial. I did a tall target test to 40 moa and it tracked perfect.

So when we went to the range with my buddy as a guest that went to 1 mile i was ready. I started at closer targets dialing each distance and kept hitting so it was working as it should. My sight picture was good till i started at the 1200 yard target and the temp and humidity was atrocious. Just normal for NC. So the mirage was like looking through a swimming pool. No issues at 1200. The dialed elevation that my ballistic app was spot on.

But the one mile became another issue. The target is a 4 foot by 4 foot steel plate with a sensor. The problem was not the scope but the plate was in the shadows of some trees with vegetation all around it so you could not see your misses. My buddy was watching through his spotting scope and nothing because of the mirage. I tried 4 shoots. Nothing. So i made the target 4 times bigger by holding on each corner. It wasn’t till i got to the upper left that the sensor went off. So my estimate was that i needed about 3/4 moa left windage and another 3/4 moa elevation.

Because the mirage was so bad at that distance i dialed down to 10x and shot one more time. The view was so much better and another hit. Needless to say I was elated.

I had bought the scope just for this. A friend of mine had a venom and he really liked this one so i sold to him. I latter regretted it and bought an Arken EP5. I am just getting ready to set it up on my fclass rifle because my buddy has a membership and i can play. I won’t be doing the mile because i down calibered my rifle to 22BR and 90 Atips are way into subsonic by then. But i have taken it to 1200 meters and pounded on a 12 inch plate. But with my NF i have to dial 28 moa and hold 10 moa in the reticle that is now dialed back to 22x which the reticle is calibrated for.

I think both scopes for the money are exceptional.

David
 
I will add my 2 cents to this thread. One of my bucket lists is to go to 1 mile. I normally shoot 1000 yard fclass and use a nxs 8-32 that has 1/8 moa clicks. This gives me only 40 moa of elevation. For my 6x47L with 115 dtacs i needed like 69 moa of elevation. So i bought a strike Eagle for 500 used. Put it in burris signature rings and put the inserts in to set the 100 yard zero at less than 1 revolution off the bottom. That gave me 90 moa to dial. I did a tall target test to 40 moa and it tracked perfect.

So when we went to the range with my buddy as a guest that went to 1 mile i was ready. I started at closer targets dialing each distance and kept hitting so it was working as it should. My sight picture was good till i started at the 1200 yard target and the temp and humidity was atrocious. Just normal for NC. So the mirage was like looking through a swimming pool. No issues at 1200. The dialed elevation that my ballistic app was spot on.

But the one mile became another issue. The target is a 4 foot by 4 foot steel plate with a sensor. The problem was not the scope but the plate was in the shadows of some trees with vegetation all around it so you could not see your misses. My buddy was watching through his spotting scope and nothing because of the mirage. I tried 4 shoots. Nothing. So i made the target 4 times bigger by holding on each corner. It wasn’t till i got to the upper left that the sensor went off. So my estimate was that i needed about 3/4 moa left windage and another 3/4 moa elevation.

Because the mirage was so bad at that distance i dialed down to 10x and shot one more time. The view was so much better and another hit. Needless to say I was elated.

I had bought the scope just for this. A friend of mine had a venom and he really liked this one so i sold to him. I latter regretted it and bought an Arken EP5. I am just getting ready to set it up on my fclass rifle because my buddy has a membership and i can play. I won’t be doing the mile because i down calibered my rifle to 22BR and 90 Atips are way into subsonic by then. But i have taken it to 1200 meters and pounded on a 12 inch plate. But with my NF i have to dial 28 moa and hold 10 moa in the reticle that is now dialed back to 22x which the reticle is calibrated for.

I think both scopes for the money are exceptional.

David
Thanks.

So far I have one nay and one yay. Lol

Mike
 
I will add my 2 cents to this thread. One of my bucket lists is to go to 1 mile. I normally shoot 1000 yard fclass and use a nxs 8-32 that has 1/8 moa clicks. This gives me only 40 moa of elevation. For my 6x47L with 115 dtacs i needed like 69 moa of elevation. So i bought a strike Eagle for 500 used. Put it in burris signature rings and put the inserts in to set the 100 yard zero at less than 1 revolution off the bottom. That gave me 90 moa to dial. I did a tall target test to 40 moa and it tracked perfect.

So when we went to the range with my buddy as a guest that went to 1 mile i was ready. I started at closer targets dialing each distance and kept hitting so it was working as it should. My sight picture was good till i started at the 1200 yard target and the temp and humidity was atrocious. Just normal for NC. So the mirage was like looking through a swimming pool. No issues at 1200. The dialed elevation that my ballistic app was spot on.

But the one mile became another issue. The target is a 4 foot by 4 foot steel plate with a sensor. The problem was not the scope but the plate was in the shadows of some trees with vegetation all around it so you could not see your misses. My buddy was watching through his spotting scope and nothing because of the mirage. I tried 4 shoots. Nothing. So i made the target 4 times bigger by holding on each corner. It wasn’t till i got to the upper left that the sensor went off. So my estimate was that i needed about 3/4 moa left windage and another 3/4 moa elevation.

Because the mirage was so bad at that distance i dialed down to 10x and shot one more time. The view was so much better and another hit. Needless to say I was elated.

I had bought the scope just for this. A friend of mine had a venom and he really liked this one so i sold to him. I latter regretted it and bought an Arken EP5. I am just getting ready to set it up on my fclass rifle because my buddy has a membership and i can play. I won’t be doing the mile because i down calibered my rifle to 22BR and 90 Atips are way into subsonic by then. But i have taken it to 1200 meters and pounded on a 12 inch plate. But with my NF i have to dial 28 moa and hold 10 moa in the reticle that is now dialed back to 22x which the reticle is calibrated for.

I think both scopes for the money are exceptional.

David

Come on you didn't go for the 12" at a mile at Coleman's? LOL ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dstoenner
I will add my 2 cents to this thread. One of my bucket lists is to go to 1 mile. I normally shoot 1000 yard fclass and use a nxs 8-32 that has 1/8 moa clicks. This gives me only 40 moa of elevation. For my 6x47L with 115 dtacs i needed like 69 moa of elevation. So i bought a strike Eagle for 500 used. Put it in burris signature rings and put the inserts in to set the 100 yard zero at less than 1 revolution off the bottom. That gave me 90 moa to dial. I did a tall target test to 40 moa and it tracked perfect.

So when we went to the range with my buddy as a guest that went to 1 mile i was ready. I started at closer targets dialing each distance and kept hitting so it was working as it should. My sight picture was good till i started at the 1200 yard target and the temp and humidity was atrocious. Just normal for NC. So the mirage was like looking through a swimming pool. No issues at 1200. The dialed elevation that my ballistic app was spot on.

But the one mile became another issue. The target is a 4 foot by 4 foot steel plate with a sensor. The problem was not the scope but the plate was in the shadows of some trees with vegetation all around it so you could not see your misses. My buddy was watching through his spotting scope and nothing because of the mirage. I tried 4 shoots. Nothing. So i made the target 4 times bigger by holding on each corner. It wasn’t till i got to the upper left that the sensor went off. So my estimate was that i needed about 3/4 moa left windage and another 3/4 moa elevation.

Because the mirage was so bad at that distance i dialed down to 10x and shot one more time. The view was so much better and another hit. Needless to say I was elated.

I had bought the scope just for this. A friend of mine had a venom and he really liked this one so i sold to him. I latter regretted it and bought an Arken EP5. I am just getting ready to set it up on my fclass rifle because my buddy has a membership and i can play. I won’t be doing the mile because i down calibered my rifle to 22BR and 90 Atips are way into subsonic by then. But i have taken it to 1200 meters and pounded on a 12 inch plate. But with my NF i have to dial 28 moa and hold 10 moa in the reticle that is now dialed back to 22x which the reticle is calibrated for.

I think both scopes for the money are exceptional.

David
Yeah, your scope wasn't the issue on the Coleman's Creek 1-mile shot. I've gone after that plate with a rifle mounting a ZCO 527 and, because of where the plate is located, it is rare to have environmental conditions in which splash of rounds not hitting the plate can be seen even if the bullet doesn't land in the brush.

Once the price point gets much over $1500 or so, it's challenging light conditions that really separate the high-dollar glass from the lesser fare. I also own three gen-3 Razor 6-36x56 scopes. They are very close to the ZCO optically, but, if I were to fling bullets at that plate again under "normal" (aka nasty) lighting conditions, I'd go for the ZCO.

Closer to home, I don't even bother shooting the north-facing 1000-yard range at Woody's unless it's very cloudy or very early/late in the day. Otherwise, mirage makes the distant plates dance over half a mil in all directions and it's about impossible to see splash/hits with lighter calibers. The only optic I've ever looked through that could "see" 900+ yards on that range in hot, high-sun conditions was a top-tier Kowa spotter with a near-4-inch objective.

I've looked through the current-gen Strike Eagle once, not long after it came out. I thought it was a great scope for the money AT THAT TIME - I have no idea how its competition compares now.

I kinda laugh when I read about people wanting a 25x or higher magnification scope to focus down to 10 yards. What, you need 25X to see something 30 feet away? With a centerfire rifle...?? Never mind that anything a yard either side of that focus point looks like there's a blob of vaseline on it from distortion. I've seen plenty of newbies (including myself once upon a time) crank that dial up to max, timer goes off, and they're trying to find targets through a field of view like a soda straw. I still know some talented shooters running gen-2 Vortex Razors, with their 32-yard closest focus, on their .22 competition rigs. I did so myself for a couple of years. Just back off the magnification to a reasonable 10-15x to increase width and depth of field for the close shots and go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dstoenner
Yeah, your scope wasn't the issue on the Coleman's Creek 1-mile shot. I've gone after that plate with a rifle mounting a ZCO 527 and, because of where the plate is located, it is rare to have environmental conditions in which splash of rounds not hitting the plate can be seen even if the bullet doesn't land in the brush.

Once the price point gets much over $1500 or so, it's challenging light conditions that really separate the high-dollar glass from the lesser fare. I also own three gen-3 Razor 6-36x56 scopes. They are very close to the ZCO optically, but, if I were to fling bullets at that plate again under "normal" (aka nasty) lighting conditions, I'd go for the ZCO.

Closer to home, I don't even bother shooting the north-facing 1000-yard range at Woody's unless it's very cloudy or very early/late in the day. Otherwise, mirage makes the distant plates dance over half a mil in all directions and it's about impossible to see splash/hits with lighter calibers. The only optic I've ever looked through that could "see" 900+ yards on that range in hot, high-sun conditions was a top-tier Kowa spotter with a near-4-inch objective.

I've looked through the current-gen Strike Eagle once, not long after it came out. I thought it was a great scope for the money AT THAT TIME - I have no idea how its competition compares now.

I kinda laugh when I read about people wanting a 25x or higher magnification scope to focus down to 10 yards. What, you need 25X to see something 30 feet away? With a centerfire rifle...?? Never mind that anything a yard either side of that focus point looks like there's a blob of vaseline on it from distortion. I've seen plenty of newbies (including myself once upon a time) crank that dial up to max, timer goes off, and they're trying to find targets through a field of view like a soda straw. I still know some talented shooters running gen-2 Vortex Razors, with their 32-yard closest focus, on their .22 competition rigs. I did so myself for a couple of years. Just back off the magnification to a reasonable 10-15x to increase width and depth of field for the close shots and go.
Thanks for verifying my issues and yes i didn’t think the scope was the main problem. I needed seriously better air to really evaluate that scope at distance. It just isn’t going to happen in NC unless it is in the 20’s and dry air

David
 
I know when i am whipped by Mother Nature
Pfft. I was spotting for Rob the day he put 3 of 6 rounds of 7mm RemMag fired on the 12" plate while holding as much as 4-5 full mils of wind. The flasher told the tale, and the CC guys ran out later in the day to verify the hits. He my hero...

...He had all his bolts tight that day... :cool::cool::cool: