it's shorter than the 5-25 so honestly it wouldn't even be an issueWon't lie I thought about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Post any issues in the thread below or reach out directly to support!
View thread Contact supportit's shorter than the 5-25 so honestly it wouldn't even be an issueWon't lie I thought about it.
Yeah but I have a TT 525P kicking around so while more expensive, it's "free" so to speak. My cost was similar to what the 6-36 costs, so I'm not too mad.it's shorter than the 5-25 so honestly it wouldn't even be an issue
……once the “full” FoV version is released in the US. There’s something icky about paying for restricted performance.I think S&B is back in the scope conversation
you do realize all of the scopes in its class except the Razor are similarly restricted, right?……once the “full” FoV version is released in the US. There’s something icky about paying for restricted performance.
Does Vortex sell the exact same Razor model somewhere else in the world that has ayou do realize all of the scopes in its class except the Razor are similarly restricted, right?
ZCO most definitely sells the full FOV versions of their scopes in Europe and overstates their numbers stateside. People still buy themDoes Vortex sell the exact same Razor model somewhere else in the world that has a higher performance?
This.Symmetry also appears to reduce the extent to which the unused parts of a reticle distract the eye, and the sense that the unused parts of the reticle fade away...
Is it breaking the law? The patent was already thrown out in Europe by Leica(?). March has no issues making large FoV options.ZCO most definitely sells the full FOV versions of their scopes in Europe and overstates their numbers stateside. People still buy them
all of a sudden it's an issue because Schmidt actually disclosed it from the start. Would you rather they break the law and violate the patent?
The patent was not thrown out in North America. March and Vortex glass is Made in JapanIs it breaking the law? The patent was already thrown out in Europe by Leica(?). March has no issues making large FoV options.
My point is that I would not spend $4k on a scope that I know is artificially restricted solely based on my geography - particularly when the patent will expire in a year or two.
Ok. How much difference ,at say 100 yards, is there in the FOV between the USA version vs the Euro version?……once the “full” FoV version is released in the US. There’s something icky about paying for restricted performance.
About 17%. It’s significant.Ok. How much difference ,at say 100 yards, is there in the FOV between the USA version vs the Euro version?
I like my S&B's, I'm glad pics got posted of the GRID in the 6x36, really tempting me.
That is significant . Thanks.About 17%. It’s significant.
Right. The point is that the patent has been shown toThe patent was not thrown out in North America. March and Vortex glass is Made in Japan
Any new owners with any through scope pics with the TR2ID reticle?
View attachment 8372130
Idk. Maybe im going crazy but that doesnt look busy to me (15x)
Is it breaking the law? The patent was already thrown out in Europe by Leica(?). March has no issues making large FoV options.
My point is that I would not spend $4k on a scope that I know is artificially restricted solely based on my geography - particularly when the patent will expire in a year or two.
I was thinking along the same line..wonder if someplace in England near Heathrow has them? Would make for quick trip.What are my thoughts were to try to buy one in Germany and bring it back…