Secret Service Wants New Rifles

DT also seems to me it’s one of those rifles where either it works for you or it doesn’t. Being a bullpup. I haven’t handled one but I have a Tavor X95 and bullpups don’t fit or work for everyone. Probably a better bet going with a traditional chassis style rifle.

I do think the double stack mags like AI uses are a better bet as well. 10 rounder same size as a AICS style 5 round and can be loaded from the top without having to be removed from the rifle. I’m not sure if it would be needed but if you wanted to quickly swap to an AP or barrier round you could load it through the top while still on the gun. Theoretically
I tried one when they still made LH versions and did not like it at all. Great concept but the execution lacked in many respects.
 
Maybe they travel places where “magnum” calibers are prohibited.

-Stan
Pretty sure that is not a thing.

They are already running heavy. Stinger missiles, ATM and mini-guns within reach. Pretty sure a magnum bolt action rifle is kosher.

They have a great deal of latitude without the usual constraints.
Similar to the grounds of an embassy being considered sovereign turf, I'm guessing they deploy they way the want or the POTUS doesn't go there.
 
That’s the CIA sniper you’re talking about.
Well hell get them some new shit too. I mean we gave the taliban a bunch of new shit why not the alphabeti.
1721862826194.jpeg
 
some obscure “But American” rule prevented that.

Methinks said rule is no longer an obstacle.
Good thought. Solicitation doc stipulates compliance with various laws (page 13 of the USSS solicitation doc), but compliance with the Buy American Act isn't required (page 17, item 48). I'm not going to parse through the statute(s), but I believe this is what was excepted:
(a) The Buy American statute restricts the purchase of supplies that are not domestic end products. For manufactured end products, the Buy American statute, E.O. 13881, and E.O. 14005 use a two-part test to define a domestic end product.
(1) The article must be manufactured in the United States; and
(2)
(i) Except for an end product that consists wholly or predominantly of iron or steel or a combination of both, the cost of domestic components shall exceed 60 percent of the cost of all the components, except that the percentage will be 65 percent for items delivered in calendar years 2024 through 2028 and 75 percent for items delivered starting in calendar year 2029.
In any case, Sec 25.104(b) makes that all bullshit, agencies can probably often draft the requirements so stringently they achieve "nonavailability" from US producers. I understand the left hand thing, but that's the only thing keeping the MSR & MRAD out of this

I bet the requirements were mostly copy & pasted from another agency's solicitation.
 
Last edited:
I bet the requirements were mostly copy & pasted from another agency's solicitation.
Either that or their preferred supplier helped them draft the specs.
That is done fairly frequently.
Another option is qualifying as a sole source vendor based on certain proprietary features listed on the RFP. It looks like they went right up to that line but did not cross it.

As you already know, it is possible to write the specs so tight that you exclude any other competition. Over certain dollar amounts they have to go through the process regardless for the sake of appearances and fair competition.
 
Definitely sounds like the 4th qtr, spend, spend, spend mantra…. We’re broke, we don’t have any money, and 4th qtr comes around, oh look what we found in the seat cushions. Ok we don’t need anything, well if we don’t spend it, we won’t get it next year, so you HAVE to spend it!!! Yeah, but if I didn’t need it this year, why do I need more next year??? Classic fraud waste and abuse that our government doesn’t do. SMH