Unertl/52 Project

R

RTH1800

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
    • Sep 16, 2009
    10,363
    6,879
    Midwest
    #1
    I mentioned in another thread that I would be updating my Win 52 Squirrel rifle. Now that the work is in progress I will post up some details in case anyone has interest.

    First, I have obtained a set of Unertl type mounts that are in new condition. No idea who built them but clearly precision was the goal. They are super precise and have zero backlash.

    The second part is that the 6X small game Unertl is being fitted with a custom dot reticule with drops in 25 yard increments to 250 yards. The data for the drops was arrived at over two years of testing in various conditions.

    All in all I think this will be my ultimate squirrel set up.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 68hoyt, camocorvette, Charger442 and 2 others
    #2
    IMG_7896.jpeg
    IMG_7895.jpeg

    These are the new mounts. Probably built in thec1960’s.
     
    • Like
    • Wow
    Reactions: Pipefitter I’m, DIBBS, 68hoyt and 5 others
    #5
    These are the Unertls I use on my squirrel rifles. The extra eyepieces are to add or subtract .33%. They change quickly and require no sighting changes.
    IMG_7899.png
     
    #8
    One of the 200 yard test for data. This lot of Eley Tenex EPS ammo has a very low ES in my rifle. It is a few years old prior to the current issues showing up. The flat nose bullet seems to have better terminal effect than the RN bullet. It’s still only effective on head shots for really consistent kills.
    IMG_3840.jpeg
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Pipefitter I’m
    #9
    Dayum RT!

    Just dayum!

    I'll wander around in the morning woods with my antique, well worn Marlin 60,
    no way I could handle the possibility of damage to such a classic setup. :oops:
     
    #10
    Funny, we all have our quirks. I feel they are built to use. But.... this rifle seems to always shoot beyond my ability. I simply cannot bring myself to shoot 50 or 100 shots at a target. My concern is simply that the magic might fade. I check POI, shoot critters. If I have a bad round of ammo I optimistic enough to think it will be shot on a sub 50 yard squirrel. The longer ones are always fired with perfect ammo. :)
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Pipefitter I’m
    #11
    I am out of my realm here but I noticed that there are a variety of spacing on the rings. How do you accommodate for "difference" in click values of the rings on each? I'm sure it is a simple matter but it seems baffling to me. A wonderful project by the way. Those older 52 just look right with those style optics.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: Charger442
    #12
    Bases are typically placed 7.2” CTC. That equals .25 MOA PER click. Mobility of the rings up and down the tube allow eye relief to be set to the shooter.
    These scopes seem to intimidate people. I know many who drill and tap receivers due to this. 10 minutes with a knowledgeable user would take care of all issues.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: DIBBS and Charger442
    #16
    Daniel G. Banting said:
    I am out of my realm here but I noticed that there are a variety of spacing on the rings. How do you accommodate for "difference" in click values of the rings on each? I'm sure it is a simple matter but it seems baffling to me. A wonderful project by the way. Those older 52 just look right with those style optics.
    Click to expand...

    Don't think about it too hard. RTH is correct about the spacing and it's equivalent moa per click. But in this case, it just doesn't matter much. 22lr ammo is cheap, when you set the scope you're not really going to be dialing for distance, thus why he's installing a graduated reticle at certain distances. Point and shoot.
     
    Last edited:
    #18
    It’s going to be simple dots in a vertical orientation.

    200 yards is my normal maximum RF range. I took these dots out to 250 yards. The first two are to be 3/4min and the remainder .25 min. Fine CH at 100 yards. I’ll try to post up photos and more detail when done. Hoping by 2/1/24.
     
    Last edited:
    #24
    RTH1800 said:
    It’s going to be simple dots in a vertical orientation.

    200 yards is my normal maximum RF range. I skipped 225 but put on a 250 yard dot. The first four are to be .5 min and the remainder .25 min. I’ll try to post up photos and more detail when done. Hoping by 2/1/24.
    Click to expand...

    im very interested in the how. ive held many Unertl reticles in my hands.... i am interested in how you're doing it, how you're measuring where to place, the calcs done to find the dot spacing, whether its going to be dots on the horsehair or will it be a cellophane disk with a "modern" printed reticle thats clued to the reticle spacer/holder?

    very intrigued.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: RTH1800
    #26
    I wanted crosswires but the concern was that getting that many parallel would be impossible. Wires running anything but parallel would look awful.

    I’ll post more when I know more.
     
    #27
    RTH1800 said:
    I wanted crosswires but the concern was that getting that many parallel would be impossible. I’ll post more when I know more.
    Click to expand...

    you would have to precisely notch the holder tube and make sure it was EXACTLY in the correct spot, with no play. i wonder if the brass holder tube could be laser cut at the correct interval and have the wire put into those notches?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: RTH1800
    #33
    Scope is returned and initial testing indicates dots are correctly placed. Still using the scope with the old USMC mounts. They work fine so no need to change. The dot sizes are .75 MOA at 50 and 75 yards. Fine crosswise at 100 yards and .5 MOA dots for 125 to 250 each 25 yards. All seem to show up well in dark woods and poor light.

    Shooting Saturday my 13 5 shot groups averaged .71' with largest being 1.15 (two) and smallest being .19. Eley Tenex EPS. All groups other than the two at 1.15 were under .9".

    The dots beyond 100 yards were measured and marked at 100 yards and are exactly where I ask for them to be. Still need to shoot.

    Conditions were 2-5 mph wind shifting from 90-180 deg. Both of the larger groups were enlarged by a single lateral flyer otherwise under the .9 size. I blamed the wind. Not sure if that is correct but likely.

    Will update as testing continues.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: camocorvette and Charger442
    #34
    The reticule has a 3/4 min dot at 50 and 75 yard points. A fine CH at 100 yards and 1/2 min dots from 125 to 250 yards in 25 yard increments. The 100 yard CH helps by giving reference and keeps me from miscounting dots, using wrong one etc. I like it so far.

    If this dot system spacing and sizing works out I will send in a Unertl 10X AO scope that I can convert to 13X or 7X for a similar set up but will add two 5 min. windage dots to the CH.
     
    Last edited:
    #35
    which rifle did you test and set up the scope for , the 28'' barrel sporter ? can you share a pic of the reticle ?thanks for the update and glad it worked out for you. i haven't been around much just happened to check in today .
     
    #36
    It is on the 28” sporter.
    I would love to post a reticle photo but have not been able to get one. Anyone have suggestions? Wondering if it has to due with small tube ?
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Similar threads

    R
    What You Aimed at Part 3
    Replies
    4
    Views
    417
    Hoser
    Hoser
    R
    Do you hit what you aim at?
    Replies
    4
    Views
    421
    RTH1800
    R
    gr8fuldoug
    Optics New Swarovski 10x52 and 14x52 NL Pure Binoculars
    Replies
    0
    Views
    265
    gr8fuldoug
    gr8fuldoug
    gr8fuldoug
    New Swarovski 10x52 and 14x52 NL Pure Binoculars
    Replies
    0
    Views
    295
    gr8fuldoug
    gr8fuldoug
    Mahk
    Best high end action(s) for field use?
    Replies
    35
    Views
    2K
    jbuck88
    jbuck88
    Top Bottom
    Back
    Home
    Forums
    Merch
    Alerts