PRICE CHANGE - Zermatt Arms Chassis - The Matterhorn

Zermatt Arms

Machining Accuracy
Full Member
Minuteman
Jul 24, 2017
407
1,429
Bennet, NE
www.bighornarms.com
Zermatt Arms is pleased to announce the newest addition to our product line, the Matterhorn rifle chassis!

The MatterhornTM is Zermatt Arms’ vision of a modern-day rifle chassis mixed with elements of a traditional rifle stock. It features an all-aluminum frame dampened with a high-density phenolic material that absorbs unwanted vibration while providing the timeless look and elegance that only high-quality hardwoods can provide. The MatterhornTM also offers a tremendous amount of adjustability to suit the needs of a wide variety of shooters using products with the Remington 700 footprint.

The MatterhornTM will be available for purchase HERE Wednesday, May 22nd for $2150 in a short action, Remington 700 inlet. It will be offered for both right- and left-handed shooters and carries the following features:

  • Full length Arca fore end
  • M-LOK accessory rails
  • Adjustable magazine catch
  • QD cups on fore end and buttstock
  • Vertical and swept grip options
  • (4) sizes of grip base plates (swept grips only, vertical grip uses flush base plate)
  • Adjustable length of pull
  • Height adjustable cheek comb
  • Laterally adjustable cheek comb
  • 100% captive action screws
  • All stainless-steel fasteners (with exception of action screws, nitride carbon steel)
  • Troughs around action screws and a recoil lug dam for bedding compound
Full specifications are listed below:

  • Base chassis: 6061 Aluminum
  • Anodized chassis base (grey and black options)
  • Wooden composite fore end dampening panels, cheek piece, grips and accents (options for colors available)
  • Base weight: 6.75 lbs
  • Fully kitted (maximum possible) weight: 12.25 lbs
  • Additional weight options:
  • Fore end: up to 22 ounces in 2.8 ounce increments (fasteners included)
  • Butt stock: 28 ounces (fasteners included)
  • External: 3 options available
  • Standard: 4.05 ounces each (fasteners included), up to 8 per chassis. Best paired with two small external weights OR one flush cup external weight and one small exterior weight OR two flush cup external weights.
  • Small: 2.66 ounces each (fasteners included), up to 14 per chassis
  • Flush cup: 2.75 ounces each (fasteners included), 1 or 2 pcs per chassis, same size as “small” external weight
  • External combination weight:
  • 8 standard and 2 small: 37.7 ounces (2.4 pounds)
  • 8 standard and 2 flush cup: 37.9 ounces (2.4 pounds)
  • 8 standard, 1 small and 1 flush cup: 37.8 ounces (2.4 pounds)
  • 14 small: 37.2 ounces (2.3 pounds)
  • Fore end width (without weights): 2.345”
  • Overall length (as sold with two LOP spacers): 34.750”
  • Minimum LOP: 13.25” – 13.375” (dependent on trigger shoe)
  • Length of pull spacers available in ¼” increments
  • Fore end length (from end of chassis to back of recoil lug): 14.125”
  • Maximum barrel diameter: 1.250”
  • Fore end depth from centerline: 1.500”


As previously mentioned, the MatterhornTM will be available for purchase HERE on Wednesday, May 22nd for $2150. We have a limited number of complete chassis ready to ship and will begin that process the week after Memorial Day.

www.zermattarms.com
 

Attachments

  • Grip Closeup.png
    Grip Closeup.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 721
  • Matterhorn Logo Closeup.png
    Matterhorn Logo Closeup.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 575
  • 0G0A4475.png
    0G0A4475.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 552
  • Buttstock Closeup.png
    Buttstock Closeup.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 708
  • Charcoal Grey Alt.png
    Charcoal Grey Alt.png
    171.8 KB · Views: 727
Oof…$2100?
Personally, I’m not a huge fan of the look but that’s just me. In general, when companies go for the hybrid chassis/traditional stock look it just doesn't appeal much to me.
That being said I’m sure there are many who will like it. Hopefully it does well. I’m definitely a fan of Zermatt actions!
 
I dig it…….. just not the prices. Looks like a bravo which I really liked the ergos of but higher quality and all the adjustments, upgrades, and improvements I would want other than I don’t see a night vision bridge option……..
 
I saw this thread sit here without any replies for a day and figured that there was some hesitation (sticker shock) in everyone's responses.

I like the fresh looks of and idea behind this chassis. I like that it is trying to be different from a lot of other chassis options (although there is the Woox). A folding option would be nice, as would a night vision bridge.

That being said: I wonder if there was a disconnect between engineering, marketing, and the decision-makers though. Even with guys buying and boasting about how much they spend in this game, I don't know how much market segment is going to be interested in this for the listed price. One of the things I like most about the Zermatt actions - like my Origin - is that it gives me so much for a very competitive price. This chassis seems like a step in a different direction. As a bean counter for our business, I've put the kybosh on a couple ideas because they were NOT cost effective.

For comparison, you can put a PVA barreled Origin action in a KRG Bravo and be out about $50 more.

Best of luck to them with this one though.
 
I think this looks pretty badA. Wood of Narnia, all the better. Can you give any detail to the wood dampening the chassis any?

Plans for long action ? What about LH? Thinking a big heavy 300 NM in this would be cool.

Way better looking than a xylo....
 
  • Like
Reactions: wind gypsy
Why the limbsaver recoil pad? I have that on my Spuhr chassis and frankly it sucks. Just too soft to efficiently manage recoil. Ok for hunting, bad for a match.

Overall I like the design, but at that price point, definitely want to finger f*** one before I spend the $$.
 
I'm a big zermatt fan, but this looks like a JAE had a one night stand with a wookie. Def not for me.
Agreed. I don't understand why a person would make a metal chassis look like a traditional stock. I mean I think...stocks have a homogeneous look compared to chassis that are skeletonized and use pistol grips and have forend covers because stocks are still evolving in shape from the by-gone constraints of having to carve it out of one piece of wood. And modern moulding processes. If you aren't constrained by those manufacturing constraints why mimic the look of a stock?

This kind of looks like someone was uninspired trying to be creative under a deadline. Like their artistic sense of innovation wasn't coming from a authentic place; a contrived style.
 
I love chassis with wood on them and I think this looks really cool. I also really like the fact that it is more of a standard stock shape above the grip (I put my thumb up top and many chassis don't allow for this).

As others have mentioned, the price is 50%+ higher than other similar premium offerings. Definitely targeting a niche market.
 
As far as the price, I bought an ATX AICS chassis for $1300 shipped. Then I bought the hinge for $285, then realized I needed a GD'd $107 shipped QD dickslot plate just to sling the gun. Most high end chassis are close to $2K these days. The XLR Envy Pro's on the BF sales are the move. Best deal and functional PRS chassis out there imo. Full up with all the fixings and weights you're into it for less than $1400. Just have to wait 5 months to deliver.
 
As far as the price, I bought an ATX AICS chassis for $1300 shipped. Then I bought the hinge for $285, then realized I needed a GD'd $107 shipped QD dickslot plate just to sling the gun. Most high end chassis are close to $2K these days. The XLR Envy Pro's on the BF sales are the move. Best deal and functional PRS chassis out there imo. Full up with all the fixings and weights you're into it for less than $1400. Just have to wait 5 months to deliver.
I agree the envy is great, XLR is about to drop their new updated version, and I'm sure the price will be in line with the acc elite or other companies flagship chassis. I could be wrong tho. I really hope they ditch the limbs aver pads, they suck. I've pulled them from all my xlr chassis, too soft and they are inconsistent in recoil if your body isn't in the same exact position every time you break the trigger. I think this Zermatt chassis did some things well, the grip contour looks great, the buttstock is a good shape, looks to have a ton of quick adjust features. Think they tried to mold the appearance of a foundation into aluminum backbones, idk just feels like a bit of a miss to me. It may shoot a lot better than it looks, time will tell!
 
I like the looks better than an MPA style chassis.

I don't like the price - I agree it's probably $500 - $700 too high - but there is a lot of machining there.

I like the wood on the forend. I have two XYLO chassis and I have 3D printed risers mounted to the bottom for shooting standing in NRA Highpower matches. Without those risers the front end give a little tuning fork "ping". I would hope that the wood dampened that on this Zermatt chassis.

I wonder how quickly you can adjust the length of pull - on the Xylo chassis I can adjust LOP for standing/sitting/prone very quickly.

Good Luck @Zermatt Arms
Ross
 
I remember when $1200 was a lot for a chassis. Prices keep creeping up because people keep buying them as they do. These will sell, maybe not as fast but they will. Personally, for me $1000 is my limit. If that means I have to buy used or on sale or not have it at all that'f fine but I'm not going over 1000 bucks.
 
As long as the loss on these isn't absorbed by the actions (especially the Origin) I'm all for them testing the waters. Their company, their money, their direction, and I appreciate their taking a chance. Just don't F-up a good thing for us in the process.

I am curious about the market research though.
 
This gun industry middle class rat race/keeping up with the Jones shit is getting ridiculous. People will buy anything at any price to look the part or cooler than the guy next to them at their local range.
 
Yeah, but $2,150 puts this chassis into a tier where pride of ownership and boasting rights dominates as much as anything else. I said it in a PM; Zermatt has a loyal following, but it isn't the market segment that jokes about the poors.
 
I like the looks and the features. If I were in the market for another chassis, I would certainly give it a hard look. I understand the carping about the price, but it’s “only” $600 more than comparable options. Seriously, if price point was the only consideration for people in this group, Tangent Theta and ZCO would never sell a scope because everyone would be buying Vortex.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BWB and Harman117
My experience so far...The fit and finish of the Matterhorn is nothing shy of amazing. The look of this chassis will always have varying opinions, but understand the panels help eliminate the metallic twang or vibration you get with other chassis systems. It also has the most "dead" recoil pulse I've experienced. Once you pick one up and get to spend any amount of time with it, you will understand the price tag... Nothing on the market compares to what this offers.
PXL_20240320_224537619.PORTRAIT.jpg
 
Did an initial impressions video. It’s actually pretty nice. To be expected with the price tag but at least they didn’t over charge and under deliver.
I do look forward to shooting this at a match next weekend.


The main thing I want to know is whether it has the usual metal chassis vibes when you shoot?

The demo I saw at High Lakes Alliance was really well made but man I really wish they would have gone with a custom pachmayer pad instead of the kick eez.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Conrad
** ANNOUNCEMENT **

After listening to customer feedback and analyzing current price trends, we have made the decision to significantly drop the price of our Matterhorn Chassis

The Matterhorn was designed and is produced to yield an extreme level of overall quality, fit, and finish with features that we feel warranted a premium price. In that pricing consideration, we wanted to allow dealers who wanted to carry the product to realize a competitive margin that drove our initial retail price up to where it has been. We still feel that the quality of the product is represented well at that introductory price, but we have come to realize the market may not support this type of product at that high price point. We also realize that without an end user, the dealer network doesn't exist either. So, we've decided to work with our dealers and offer our product at a lower price point to you, the end user. What this all boils down to is this...you spoke, we listened, and now the Matterhorn is available at what we feel is an incredible price for such a premium, feature rich product.

If you have any questions, as always, you can reach out to us here or through any of our social platforms as well as emailing us directly at [email protected]
 
I love Zermatt Arms. Have 3 actions, looking at adding #4.
Fondled the Matterhorn at the 2024 Precision Rifle Expo in Little Rock this past weekend while chatting with the factory reps.
Nice stock, great feel, fit, and finish.

Why is the LOP so fricken long? Modern square stance,,,,,shorter LOP. Had the same conversation with every other stock and chassis maker. Lots of money for a spacer system lop adjustment.
 
I love Zermatt Arms. Have 3 actions, looking at adding #4.
Fondled the Matterhorn at the 2024 Precision Rifle Expo in Little Rock this past weekend while chatting with the factory reps.
Nice stock, great feel, fit, and finish.

Why is the LOP so fricken long? Modern square stance,,,,,shorter LOP. Had the same conversation with every other stock and chassis maker. Lots of money for a spacer system lop adjustment.
I haven’t handled a Matterhorn yet, but the length of pull is 13 1/4, I call that short.
 
Rifle classes and training seems to be advising shorter and shorter lop these days. I’ve kinda settled on 12.75” , but that’s also summer and tshirt shooting. I would prefer 12-12.5” minimum and I’m not alone. Factory reps have told me they are getting increasing requests to go shorter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dawhit and TheOE800
Rifle classes and training seems to be advising shorter and shorter lop these days. I’ve kinda settled on 12.75” , but that’s also summer and tshirt shooting. I would prefer 12-12.5” minimum and I’m not alone. Factory reps have told me they are getting increasing requests to go shorter.
How tall are you?