Suppressors Area 419 Maverick vs BOSS Chairman K

H

Hickswr

Gunny Sergeant
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 5, 2019
675
670
Alabama
#1
Has anyone directly compared the two? Pros/cons

Looking for my first suppressor for PRS use mainly but it would be nice to take the brake off and use it for hunting also.

Curious if the recoil reduction on one is better than the other.

Any others I should consider?

Unfortunately it looks like the end cap on the TBAC RR models aren’t removable by the user like the Maverick and Chairman K models are.
 
#2
I have a Maverick waiting on a form 3 to my dealer. But plan on getting a boss and thunderbeast RR. Only thing I’m not sure of with the boss is the alignment method. From what I gather u use shims. With my ocd, muzzle device and shims are never perfect.
 
#3
Shot a one day at Frontline this past weekend with the BOSS TOP SHOT with integrated muzzle brake. I very much liked it and will run it the rest of the season.

It did not hold me back…shooting 22B. Recoil reduction was in the ballpark of my 419 Match and obviously a LOT quieter. Certainly not as quite as my buddy shooting a TBAC ultra 7…

To me, recoil impulse feels less like a can’s push and is a shorter, “snap” like a brake.

Currently the brake is timed with Precision Armament precision ground washers and works well. Albeit with a touch of trial and error to find the right one, but bore alignment stays true. As heard a rumor an improved system might be in the work with an integrated locking indexing capability that will eliminate the need for spacers. I don’t know if/when that will hit market.

I used the shims to index my 419 taper mount 1x so its a non issue for me.

I love my TBAC cans. And I love their RR addition. But at <$900, I have a mancrush on the BOSS….

Just my 0.02….take it for what it is worth.

ZY
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hickswr
#11
Hickswr said:
Has anyone directly compared the two? Pros/cons

Looking for my first suppressor for PRS use mainly but it would be nice to take the brake off and use it for hunting also.

Curious if the recoil reduction on one is better than the other.

Any others I should consider?

Unfortunately it looks like the end cap on the TBAC RR models aren’t removable by the user like the Maverick and Chairman K models are.
Click to expand...
Hopefully it’s been addressed but the brake is removable and user time-able on the TBAC RR cans. That being said, that’s what I would wait for honestly. Takes a 6.5cm and turns it into a dasher or less recoil wise.
 
#12
I’ve shot with the Magnus K and S model RR cans on a 6.5cm, dasher, and 223. It works, and it works extremely well. Recoil is better reduced with the Magnus K RR as more gas makes it to the brake portion. But if you want a good balance between sound and recoil reduction, the Magnus S RR would be the one.
 
#13
Megalodong said:
www.snipershide.com

Suppressors - New TBAC Brake+Can

Can’t wait to see/hear the details on this! Gotta be coming soon since it’s on their IG stories.
www.snipershide.com www.snipershide.com

They got their posts deleted, but still in some quotes. After that display count me out on BOSS regardless of the price point.
Click to expand...
lol holy shit

imagine the circus if you locked them in a room with the structured barrel bureau
 
#14
I couldn’t tell a shit’s worth of difference in recoil reduction between Maverick and TBAC RR. Same rifle and ammo.

There was a small perceptible difference in sound and tone, but neither of them would be considered “quiet.”

A majority of guys would be hard pressed to tell which one they were shooting if they didn’t know.

ETA: BOSS or whatever that crap is shouldn’t even be a consideration when you have options like the Maverick and TBAC.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hickswr
#15
Krob95 said:
Hopefully it’s been addressed but the brake is removable and user time-able on the TBAC RR cans. That being said, that’s what I would wait for honestly. Takes a 6.5cm and turns it into a dasher or less recoil wise.
Click to expand...
I’m still playing catch-up on cans in general but I thought the brakes aren’t removable on the TBAC RR like they are on the Maverick and the Chairman K.

Are you sure the brake can be replaced with a traditional end cap by the user?
0E6B7A2E-A779-4A1D-B608-2427325BE77A.jpeg
 
Last edited:
#17
Yup. Tbac explained it in the other thread. Their Attorneys (who specialize in NFA) recommended not including extra caps, as each part by law is a suppressor. Just because other companies are running afoul of the law, doesn't mean they want to expose themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hellzna and Hickswr
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NiteQwill
Suppressors TBAC Magnus RR-K vs Area419 Maverick vs Without Warning CHAD
Replies
55
Views
2K
Tx_Aggie
T
txbass97
SOLD Area 419 Hellfire Match .30 Cal Muzzle Brake, Area 419 Hellfire Suppressor Mount for TBAC CB/Ultra, TBAC SR Brake (5/8x24)
Replies
2
Views
236
Dogsniper
Dogsniper
K
Suppressors "Braked-suppressor" options; leaning towards Area 419 Maverick
Replies
6
Views
884
Guns&WhiteWater
Guns&WhiteWater
5RWill
Suppressors KGM R30 vs Area 419 Maverick.
Replies
24
Views
4K
GBMaryland
GBMaryland
7
Sidearms & Scatterguns Auto vs OU? Where to compromise on field shotgun?
Replies
36
Views
1K
748rpilot
7
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts