• Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support
  • You Should Now Be Receiving Emails!

    The email issued mentioned earlier this week is now fixed! You may also have received previous emails that were meant to be sent over the last few days - apologies, this was a one time issue and shouldn't happen again!

Spotters Swarovski, vs Hensoldt, vs Kowa, etc

Mike Casselton

No, I just wear the T-shirt
Full Member
Minuteman
  • Nov 25, 2007
    11,711
    22,821
    Lithia, FL
    A buddy of mine is looking to get a set of great, not good, GREAT spotters.

    Their use will be for ELR, over 2000 yards.




    ****** The first and most important requirement is to have a Mil reticle available. That's not negotiable.



    Second, is a binocular type of eye piece. If available.



    This is where the problems start.

    Swarovski and Kowa both make fantastic bino style spotters.

    Kowa.
    What can I say? Great glass, big, stable, various mags available for eye pieces.
    And, you can in theory, mix and match if you want to go to mono view. No forehead rest for long term viewing. (Not really sure how important that is)
    No picatinny rails.

    Swarovski.
    Great, really great glass. Bino and mono ocular setups available. 65-100mm main bodies available. Not sure if picatinny rails are doable.

    Is there a mil reticle available?
    ??????



    Hensoldt.
    Great glass. Neutral color, mil reticle available. Mono view. Picatinny rails available for red dot or LRF pairing.





    This begs a question.

    What else is out there that has comparable glass, a Mil reticle and possibly bino viewing?





    *****?Which ones are easier to spot trace with? ******

    Which one has the better ability to resolve impacts at 2000+ yards?



    Back in 2021, at the PRE, I overheard a discussion between the Swarovski and the Hensoldt.
    Heard the Hensoldt was easier to spot trace.


    What are your thoughts on this matter?
     
    Last edited:
    I don't think you can get a reticle in either Kowa or Swarovski spotting scopes, sans getting a custom one made from some boutique optics outfit.

    The mil reticle will really limit the options.
     
    I don't think you can get a reticle in either Kowa or Swarovski spotting scopes, sans getting a custom one made from some boutique optics outfit.

    The mil reticle will really limit the options.

    The reticle requirement is what makes this a difficult task.

    To upgrade his spotter from the older HD Bushnell with reticle, the scope really needs to be a solid, clearly visible improvement over the Bushy.

    I was unaware of the Zeiss with a reticle, but based on the review of the Swaro in attached link below, it seems trying to find the Zeiss is futile.



    I don't know what his feeling will be on the big growth the Swaro has to include the reticle.
    I can see having the ocular mounted low could be an issue.

    It would be nice to have a place like the Outdoorsmans nearby to be able to make comparisons.
    Sadly, this is the Tampa Bay area and we're lucky to have BPS and Sportsman's Warehouse. Neither place stocks the good stuff.
     

    Mike I had a Leupod 20-60 with the reticle years ago, the glass was amazing might want to add leupod to the list of spotters your looking at they are nice...not sure about your Scheels or Sportsman's but ours here in Reno normally have these in stock and will take you outside to look through them.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: TheBigCountry

    Mike I had a Leupod 20-60 with the reticle years ago, the glass was amazing might want to add leupod to the list of spotters your looking at they are nice...not sure about your Scheels or Sportsman's but ours here in Reno normally have these in stock and will take you outside to look through them.

    The Leupold have always been solid spotters and IIRC, he's used them overseas.


    Scheels?
    I could only dream about having them here in FL. Same with Cabela's.

    We get BPS, Sportsmans and Academy (the K-Mart of outdoor stores.

    It might end up being a case of jumping on an airplane to compare them. He does travel a bit, so that option could work.
     
    I have compared the Kowa TSN's 773 and the 883 in the field. On its own the 77 looks great but compared to the 88 the 88 is fantastic: sharper, more contrast and a little brighter. A good sample of 88 is at least as sharp and bright as Swaro but virtually without ca and excellent fine focussystem. I have the 883 now for 13 years and it feels and works as new.

    Kowa doesn't make a spotter with a reticle that we're aware of.
     
    Vortex Razor enters the chat with the 22x fixed eyepiece.

    Apparently, Tract offered a fixed reticle option, but it's no longer on their site.

    ETA: did some more digging and found a fixed mil reticle using a different link to the Tract site.
     
    Last edited:
    I have two scopes with them. Rick uses Tremor 5 (I think) on his ELR scopes. They are NF 7-35.

    The downside to the Tremor and H-59 is taking up so much real estate, making spotting and trace even more difficult to see.

    Looking at the reticle in the Minox scope, it seems to be a good reticle without too much clutter.

    It would be so awesome to be able to get behind a bunch of these and compare them in the same atmospheric conditions.
     
    I do want to say though that I am following this closely as I think it’s useful for many of us dabblers in the sorta ELR and real ELR club. I have an old Kona with great glass and I’m digging around at home for the 30-60x eyepiece, but as we know Kona doesn’t do reticle at this time.

    And being able to have a quick measuring tool while spotting at distance is an distinct advantage.
     
    If you know what you’re doing (I don’t) the star-gazing crowd has taken the Pentax spotters and added all sorts of weird eyepieces to them.

    See, the big Pentax (80mm, 100mm, the new 85mm) take standard 1.25” telescope eyepieces. I bet a machinist that mods telescope eyepieces could make many eyepieces work. You have to know something about optics/focusing too, obviously, so any old machinist won’t cut it.

    I hear some of the Pentax eyepieces are world class. Alway been tempted to buy the 100mm but prefer angled eyepiece setups.

    1728877547448.jpeg
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lash and LR1845
    ^like you haven’t heard that one before

    But seriously, here’s to hoping you get some power back soon! 🍻

    Got it back on just after dinner time.
    Closed up the house and enjoyed it for a couple of hours. Then Rebecca and I noticed it started feeling warm.
    I had an Ah-Ha moment and lifted up the drain float. Click!!
    Yep, that's it.
    Took the little Stinger vac outside and let it slurp up all the refreshed green slime that had dried and then created a plug when it got wet again.

    All was well and I slept like a baby last night.
     
    The reticle requirement is what makes this a difficult task.

    To upgrade his spotter from the older HD Bushnell with reticle, the scope really needs to be a solid, clearly visible improvement over the Bushy.

    I was unaware of the Zeiss with a reticle, but based on the review of the Swaro in attached link below, it seems trying to find the Zeiss is futile.



    I don't know what his feeling will be on the big growth the Swaro has to include the reticle.
    I can see having the ocular mounted low could be an issue.

    It would be nice to have a place like the Outdoorsmans nearby to be able to make comparisons.
    Sadly, this is the Tampa Bay area and we're lucky to have BPS and Sportsman's Warehouse. Neither place stocks the good stuff.
    I have an STR80. It gives up nothing to the Henny other than it is larger since it is not a folded optical path. If size is OK, I would put its glass up against any other spotter. The electronic reticle is sweet and more usable than what comes on the Henny, IMHO. The downside with the Henny is that the warranty is nonexistent.