How important is ring torque

blacklab1

blacklab1

Sergeant of the Hide
Full Member
Minuteman
Sep 23, 2018
195
145
#1
I put together 2 new rifles for hunting this year and both have Leupold VX-5 on them with Vortex pro rings. I sighted them in at 100 yards and everything was fine but I haven’t had time to check tracking on them yet. Tonight I was playing with a different rifle mounting a different scope and something seemed off. After screwing around for awhile I figured out my one torque wrench shit the bed. I got a different one and decided to check the 2 VX-5’s that I mounted earlier and sure enough they were torqued to around 45-50 in lbs. I re-torqued then to 20 in lbs but I’m wondering if I did any damage, I doubt I’ll have time to check them until next weekend. Anyone else ever do this and what was the outcome?
 
Last edited:
#4
Scopes, in general, are a lot more robust that they were in the past. If the scope isn’t visibly damaged, and it still tracks/zooms/focuses/etc ok, then it is probably fine.

But, Leupold has pretty good CS (at least that has been my experience). You could call them if you have concerns.
 
#6
blacklab1 said:
No, I started at 20 lbs and went up in 2 lb increments until the wrench clicked. They were a little over 45lbs.
Click to expand...

That's not an accurate way to measure the previous torque.

It's not much different than loosening and measuring at the same time.
It takes a lot more torque to move the screw once it's stopped rotating.


If you've ever pushed a car or truck, you know it takes double the effort to get it moving. Once it's moving the effort to keep it moving is not that high.
Add in a slight incline and it's like coming up on your torque setting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: supercorndogs, Krazy_jim and Rubicon Precision
#7
I've seen similar things happen. If there was any damage, I think there would be some evidence of the tube buckling. This would manifest itself in the form of minute ridges forming where the ring was. You may or may not be able to see them, but you can feel them. Just run your fingers around the circumference of the scope tube. If you can feel ridges, there was some buckling. This doesn't necessarily mean that the scope wont work though.
 
#8
The myth of trying to determine current bolt tightness by either loosening or tightening with a torque wrench (linked to timestamp)


Btw only certain torque wrenches are ok to use when loosening. Many types’ accuracy is degraded by loosening. See:


For interest, here is part 1


For the above vids, the author put timestamp shortcuts in the video description.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ma smith
#9
carbonbased said:
The myth of trying to determine current bolt tightness by either loosening or tightening with a torque wrench (linked to timestamp)


Btw only certain torque wrenches are ok to use when loosening. Many types’ accuracy is degraded by loosening. See:


For interest, here is part 1


For the above vids, the author put timestamp shortcuts in the video description.
Click to expand...

Very informative, thank you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carbonbased
#12
Mike Casselton said:
That's not an accurate way to measure the previous torque.

It's not much different than loosening and measuring at the same time.
It takes a lot more torque to move the screw once it's stopped rotating.


If you've ever pushed a car or truck, you know it takes double the effort to get it moving. Once it's moving the effort to keep it moving is not that high.
Add in a slight incline and it's like coming up on your torque setting.
Click to expand...
This has never been my experience. I always need less torque to remove the bolt than when it was torqued. It has literally never been more. Maybe if there are tapered interfaces?
 
#13
JWG said:
This has never been my experience. I always need less torque to remove the bolt than when it was torqued. It has literally never been more. Maybe if there are tapered interfaces?
Click to expand...

when you look at it from a physics standpoint, moving a screw that is at rest takes more torque because static friction is higher than kinetic friction.
 
#14
Charger442 said:
when you look at it from a physics standpoint, moving a screw that is at rest takes more torque because static friction is higher than kinetic friction.
Click to expand...
It's also under load with two angular surfaces, with energy being spent toward the effort of extraction. This is why screws don't "vibrate tighter". All I know is that I can loosen ring cap screws literally every time with my torque wrench after tightening them using the same torque wrench at the same setting. Same for mounts clamped to the rail.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

blacklab1
Inconsistent POI.
Replies
23
Views
666
blacklab1
blacklab1
F
Cantilever mount torque mishap
Replies
15
Views
500
redneckbmxer24
R
R
Scope ring half gaps?
Replies
12
Views
887
rmiked
R
R
Is this acceptable for a high end ring manufacturer?
Replies
48
Views
2K
Aftermath
Aftermath
W
Installing savage barrel on ARC action
Replies
30
Views
607
Woolsocks
W
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts