Republicans just suck

Even ehwn they have the majority they just cant stick together. Collins,Murtawski .Tillis and the one from Indiana already squawking about Trumps picks. The Dems would approve Satan himself if they had the chance.

That's because they're not truly conservative, they are RINOs. Like McConnell, John Cornyn, even Dan Crenshaw and the list goes on and on.
 
Yes. Democrats don't blink at eye if one of their leaders fucks a baby during a hearing, they honestly do not.

Republicans will absolutely shit on Trump for the next two years, then lose both the house and senate and return to being the political party led by fucking cucks.

Riots are coming and we will have no fucking leadership other than Trump and Vance.
 
While i might doubt repubs questioning Trump's picks, remember his picks from last time. Even Trump said he picked wrongly in some cases, relying upon the advice of others.

That is why I don't mind him picking non-politicians to cabinet positions. They have not spent a career having their party members film them having sex with kids to keep them in line.
 
Last edited:
That's because they're not truly conservative, they are RINOs. Like McConnell, John Cornyn, even Dan Crenshaw and the list goes on and on.
The problem is that they are “conservative”.

The true conservatives Just vote no to everything. ..going to build the wall, it’s costs a penny..vote no. They are the ones who stonewall anything that might push the ball forward.

The ones you mentioned are just weak people who try to stay in the middle to keep their job..first job of a politician it to keep their job. Then they govern
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCP and Aftermath
Also just checking: If I don't like one of trumps picks, does that make me a libertard? Which one do I have permission to disapprove of? Just one, or how about two? Three? Where's the limit?

Sounding like an echo chamber around here: It might be possible to have a bad choice (*cough* Harriet Miers *cough*).

Remember 99% agreement is not enough!! You must agree with the group 100% or be ostracized as a liberal scum!
 
Also just checking: If I don't like one of trumps picks, does that make me a libertard? Which one do I have permission to disapprove of? Just one, or how about two? Three? Where's the limit?

Sounding like an echo chamber around here: It might be possible to have a bad choice (*cough* Harriet Miers *cough*).

Remember 99% agreement is not enough!! You must agree with the group 100% or be ostracized as a liberal scum!
Pretty much what I was saying before. I think it is okay for some to question Trump's picks. Even Trump said on the JRE podcast that he made some choices in error.

Not that he will be perfect. No one is. But if I were Trump, I would go ahead and troll and give name for Director of the FBI and get Wray to packing his box of stuff from the office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: greg1147
That's because they're not truly conservative, they are RINOs. Like McConnell, John Cornyn, even Dan Crenshaw and the list goes on and on.

Cornyn is an absolute turncoat disappointment here in Texas, liberals have to be voting for him in the primary, because I don't know anyone who votes for him willingly in the general election.
 
I’ve actually never made a whore moan because I’ve never had to pay for sex. Must suck to be a needle dick fuck.
I will have to ask your husband after you give him the rusty trombone treatment.Maybe after he will take the training wheels off your scooter so you can jump the speed bumps in the parking lot of your trailer park. You shouldn't be such a hostile gay it's no ones fault but your own and that uncle of yours who still plays with your dirty spot.
 
Did you guys measure up yet?
756gauyna2g61.jpg
 
The problem is that they are “conservative”.

The true conservatives Just vote no to everything. ..going to build the wall, it’s costs a penny..vote no. They are the ones who stonewall anything that might push the ball forward.

The ones you mentioned are just weak people who try to stay in the middle to keep their job..first job of a politician it to keep their job. Then they govern
The 17th amendment needs repealed. Before the 17th, senators could be recalled at will by the governor and/or the people of the state.
 
The 17th amendment needs repealed. Before the 17th, senators could be recalled at will by the governor and/or the people of the state.
Truthfully term limits fix most of it.

Senators can get 3 so 18 years total and house 2 so 8 years total

I think there is a benefit to have someone “almost” like pelosi on each side who when she makes a phone call stuff happens. Kind of keep status quo and limits the crazy swings every few years.
But there should be a new batch of people every 8-10 years.

They just get too far removed from reality being in there so long. Can’t blame them as it’s a cocoon but that’s the problem..it’s a cocoon.

Would also make them make decisions because they would all need a job or fun for higher office.so in theory it would put a fire under them to choose or stagnate. Both are beneficial to the country. You can’t stop wall for 4/5 terms and be a roadblock etc
 
Truthfully term limits fix most of it.

Senators can get 3 so 18 years total and house 2 so 8 years total

I think there is a benefit to have someone “almost” like pelosi on each side who when she makes a phone call stuff happens. Kind of keep status quo and limits the crazy swings every few years.
But there should be a new batch of people every 8-10 years.

They just get too far removed from reality being in there so long. Can’t blame them as it’s a cocoon but that’s the problem..it’s a cocoon.

Would also make them make decisions because they would all need a job or fun for higher office.so in theory it would put a fire under them to choose or stagnate. Both are beneficial to the country. You can’t stop wall for 4/5 terms and be a roadblock etc
I disagree.

Term limits only means they will be thinking about being re-elected less times but from the first time in, that's where they all spend most of their energy...getting re-elected rather than representing their constituents. In the case of the senate, if they were appointed by the governor of the state (as the COTUS originally intended), they would not have to worry about being re-elected and simply due to the elections of governors, you are almost guaranteed to not have senate lifers.

I do agree with term limits though. Right straight across the board for all elected positions. If it's good enough for the executive office, it should be plenty good enough for the legislators. 2 elected terms max.

Then there is the SCOTUS and that stupid lifetime appointment. While I agree that the Judicial should be politically insulated, they are not. In fact, they continuously show they are politically ACTIVE rather than objective. So...term limits should apply to them, too. Maybe a 20 year max.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XP1K
Even ehwn they have the majority they just cant stick together. Collins,Murtawski .Tillis and the one from Indiana already squawking about Trumps picks. The Dems would approve Satan himself if they had the chance.
NOT Republicans. The ones you pointed out are RINO's
 
FIFY. Problem would sort itself out pretty quickly.
Oh...
I have posted a list of repeals to include 16, 17, 19, amend 25, make a new one that requires members of congress to obey (pay?) any and all new laws retroactive to their date of election while the new rules won't take effect until the next fiscal year for WE THE PEOPLE. There's plenty more....like only property owners should be voting (original COTUS before all the extra additions).
 
Careful. Once a Constitutional Convention is called, all amendments are up for discussion.
Are we allowed to bring up secession too? Can us conservative/libertarian types claim like Montana, Wyoming, and one of the Dakotas? That’s all we really need
 
Are we allowed to bring up secession too? Can us conservative/libertarian types claim like Montana, Wyoming, and one of the Dakotas? That’s all we really need
We don’t really need any Dakotas. Maybe some of Wyoming, Montana, Washington and Oregon. Or maybe just Greater Idaho with an ocean port and call it a day
 
Really funny article today about Bill Maher saying Liberals lost because they are intolerant and if you don't agree with them, they throw you out.

Sounds familiar?

Clip: its on Fox (he=Bill Mahr)

1731989369828.png


Link:

Like I said, almost like the system was designed to be frustrating.

Almost.
 

I think the RINO list will be expanded within the first six months of the Trump administration.

After the vote on Wednesday, Amy Kremer posted this list of the Republican Senators who voted for Rick Scott (instead of John Cornyn or Thune):

  • Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
  • Ted Cruz (R-TX)
  • Bill Hagerty (R-TN)
  • Ron Johnson (R-WI)
  • Mike Lee (R-UT)
  • Cynthia Lummis (R-WY)
  • Rand Paul (R-KY)
  • Marco Rubio (R-FL)
  • Eric Schmitt (R-MO)
  • Rick Scott (R-FL)
  • Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
  • Tommy Tuberville (R-AL)
  • JD Vance (R-OH)

Partial Senator RINO list:The Hill reported that these 9 senators are most likely to obstruct Trump’s cabinet appointments:

  • Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
  • Joni Ernst (R-IA)
  • Todd Young (R-IN)
  • Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
  • Bill Cassidy (R-LA)
  • Susan Collins (R-ME)
  • Thom Tillis (R-NC)
  • John Cornyn (R-TX)
  • John Curtis (R-UT)
 
Last edited: