It looks like my Wheeler Fat Wrench has gone kaput.
Are Fixit Sticks still the preferred torque sensing tools or is there New Hotness ?
Are Fixit Sticks still the preferred torque sensing tools or is there New Hotness ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stuff falling off isn't as much of a concern but twisting the treads out of an alloy part or snapping off a fastener is a concern.If it was me, I'd get another FAT Wrench, my personal one has been reliable for years and if it does go tits up one day then I'd go get another one probably. I have Fix It Sticks and Borka too, owned Seekonk wrenches at one point also but the FAT Wrench isn't a bad thing to have at the bench, none of my stuff has fallen off the gun because of it.
Yep. Haven’t had that happen yet.I had a Fix It Sticks bit lock up and would start overtightening fasteners. FIS took care of it but stuff can happen to any brand.
Fixit Sticks win (for me) in the ease of use category, at least if you buy the preset torque attachments. They also sell a non-clicking 0-65 in/lbs general attachment that is a bit less accurate but works fine.
I recently watched a few videos of independent testing on several common 1/2” torque wrenches. Snap-On faired the best but was followed very closely by several made in Chyna from Dewalt to a Harbor Freight brand, Icon. Granted it was a small sample size in these tests. I was buying for lug nuts so not an exact science.View attachment 8550478
Snap-on Store
shop.snapon.com
There was someone here who thought owning this toy here constituted "flexing on the poors" in a vulgar, ostentatious manner...
But the circuitry and sensors are practically identical to those made in Taiwan and China.
Any old digital torque wrench with the appropriate range from Amazon.com will do fine.
Most torque settings for our firearms aren't "Precision" or "Aerospace Grade" as bubba would have you believe.
We're not dealing with automotive components where the safety of your "Family, Friends, and Loved Ones" and many others are really biblically tantamount and taken seriously.
You may be right about some tests. I have no idea. Please link to them.That’s not true at all and tests have proven it. The all on one is more accurate and consistent and the limiters. It also costs a whole hell of a lot less money than buying every limiter you need. It’s a no brainer.
Post #15 above links to the torque wrench testing that a member did here and in that are comparisons of the FIS limiters and All In One. In that test, specifically posts #26 and #35 of the linked thread, the All In One had significantly less variation than the limiters, well under their advertised 10%.You may be right about some tests. I have no idea. Please link to them.
That’s a pretty cool linkPost #15 above links to the torque wrench testing that a member did here and in that are comparisons of the FIS limiters and All In One. In that test, specifically posts #26 and #35 of the linked thread, the All In One had significantly less variation than the limiters, well under their advertised 10%.
@redneckbmxer24 and @Trigger Monkey , the fellow conducting the test apparently only used one sample of each torque device, right? Except for the 15 in/ibs FIS model, which failed the test, but its replacement was exceeding accurate (under 1%).That’s not true at all and tests have proven it. The all on one is more accurate and consistent and the limiters. It also costs a whole hell of a lot less money than buying every limiter you need. It’s a no brainer.
There isn't. It's not an aerospace application. It's degrees of autism arguing about a 1 or 10% repeatability when neither have any bearing on putting rounds down range. The actual range of effectiveness for torque values in firearm applications is multiples...not fractions.Anecdotally, shit tons of people use Fix It Sticks all in one torque driver and haven’t reported a bunch of problems on here that I’ve seen, myself included. My first one did start having the reference line reset to around 3-5 instead of 0. They replaced it quickly and no further issues. You’re kinda guessing anyway from 15-25 because there’s no reference lines in between.
The latest Snap On digital 1/4 inch torque wrench adjusts in .1 in/lb increments.Fix-It's are pretty handy but not in the range or configured for muzzle devices and castle nuts ; for the later I use the old school Craftsman click style.
View attachment 8550637View attachment 8550638View attachment 8550639View attachment 8550640
I like to go until I hear a pop, feel the threads give out or feel the scope tube start to crush inOld school dials and the all-in-1 show continuous force measurement, which means as you approach X target value, you can see if anything odd is going on. Even if your X value is off by 3-4% more or less, this almost 100% will not result in a total thread failure.
Clickers and limiters train the end user like a monkey to "keep pushing" until "you feel something happen"...which means keep pushing until you the threads give out if the clicker/limiter is broken or defective...![]()
Here’s my impact that I use on everything.I like to go until I hear a pop, feel the threads give out or feel the scope tube start to crush in
Then I back off a 1/4 turn
That way I know I’m right on the upper edge
Can’t be to careful. Lots of idiots out there![]()
This is what I do. I love some of the Borka tools, but I love some of the FIS tools as well. My kit has both.I’ve always assumed that the Borka Tool was limited in its accuracy to the user. I think I do a fairly good job of operating it properly but after reading the outstanding reviews of the fix it sticks all in one, I may add a set of those limiters to my Borka kit for the ultimate range setup.
I agree. This is a bunch of mental masturbation for the most part. Not convinced the majority of uses need to be as precise as folks are getting at.There isn't. It's not an aerospace application. It's degrees of autism arguing about a 1 or 10% repeatability when neither have any bearing on putting rounds down range. The actual range of effectiveness for torque values in firearm applications is multiples...not fractions.
BTW I am an Engineer!