• Win a RIX Storm S3 Thermal Imaging Scope!

    To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!

    Join the contest

Be Wary MPT! "Take it Down" act is coming!

Fx51LP308

Fx51LP308

Old Salt
Full Member
Minuteman
    • Apr 8, 2021
    2,960
    4,439
    Tampa Bay, FL
    #1
    Just saw this on Newsmax, sponsored by Sen. Ted Cruz. The "Take it down" act to prevent Deep Fake AI images of nude people being published on the Internet when a complaint is filed against that Internet site.


    A portion of the act reads as follows:
    It shall be unlawful for any person in interstate of foreign commerce to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish an intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual who is a minor with intent to - abuse, humiliate, harass or degrade the minor; or around or gratify the $exual desire of any person.
    Click to expand...

    The bill passed unanimously in the Senate. It's awaiting a vote in the House. If signed into law, our MPT rules will have to be modified. Maybe less AI stuff.

    Watch out!
     
    Last edited:
    #9
    Some more info coming in. Apparently, the website in question must take down the image within 48 hours of being notified by the complainant. The lady in question with Ted Cruz is a HS senior, but could be 18.
     
    #11
    #12
    Fx51LP308 said:
    Some more info coming in. Apparently, the website in question must take down the image within 48 hours of being notified by the complainant. The lady in question with Ted Cruz is a HS senior, but could be 18.
    Click to expand...

    (Sarcasm font)


    So, Ted created a new law which basically covers people's regret.
    Oops, I sent nudes to my boyfriend when I was 16. I screwed around on him and now the images are public and AI.
    Waaaaah!!

    Okay, sarcasm off for the time being.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: oneshot86 and lash
    #16
    Oh no! The dudes on here who like sharing beat-off material and pushing the MPT rules with every post are going to have to go to real porn sites to jack off to???

    63f.jpg





    ***********

    My next question is: Will it be illegal to remove Big Mike's penis bump on all of the meme's now?



    Just wondering...
     
    • Haha
    • Like
    Reactions: FWoo45, akmike47, myronman3 and 5 others
    #19
    Basically it's the anti revenge porn bill all dressed up to include the hot buttons of
    "AI"
    and
    "Protect the Children"

    To help it get passed and get folks to ignore the whole 1A stuff and things.

    Basically it's the make it illegal to embarrass people with what they did act.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: lash
    #24
    Death From A Distance said:
    The victims testimony is compelling

    Click to expand...


    Not gonna bother watching the video. I'm tired and honestly don't care enough.



    It's pretty fucking simple though.

    If you don't want your nudes public, don't take nude images.

    No nude images? Nothing to go public.

    AI is another matter, and it's only gonna get better/worse at the same time.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: oneshot86, HD1911 and lash
    #26
    Mike Casselton said:
    I have zero idea who she is.
    Click to expand...

    She was on the USA Gymnastics Team that went to the 2012 London Olympics, along with Gabby Douglas, Aly Reismann, Jordyn Weieber, etc. She (Maroney) won the gold medal in individual vault, IIRC. Some of them may have also gone to Rio 2016 (Reismann did for sure), but that would be the first time for Simone Biles as well.

    You may recall in the 2012 Olympics where she captured silver or bronze on one of the competitions and on the platform she had a look for which people created a ton of memes. It was entitled, "Not impressed."

    1733942483763.png


    I mean, even Obama tried to imitate the meme!

    1733942802063.png
     
    Last edited:
    #28
    Death From A Distance said:
    One of the victims had her image super imposed over a porn video. Another victim was video taped while being raped, and that was used for black mail. There are many more like this, where through no fault of their own were victimized. Most have no recourse, and I am not sure the best way to handle this type of victimization.
    Click to expand...

    A short rope and a long drop.
    That is, after they are tortured for two weeks.
    Also, suffocation is a good option.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 6/250/40, Kamerad, HD1911 and 1 other person
    #29
    Any woman that post/sends nudes to someone and they end up on the web......too bad!

    I have always wondered how these people that take celebs and photoshop their head on a nude body get away with it. I mean, you are really jacking with their character, and had always seemed like a libel suit in the making. All sounds like free speech until it is your daughter or family.

    I'm not going to read the bill, but I was bored one day and tried the deep fake thing, where somehow AI generates a nude out of a regular image. I did it with a picture of my ex-wife. It was remarkably close! I could see this being an issue for people seeking revenge, girls in high school, college, or even a co-worker you don't like.

    This is just another example of making more rules and laws for the douchebags in society that don't know how to act like humans!

    MORE RULES, MORE RULES........none of these ever really fix the real issues! Hangings, castrations, and whacking off limbs would be way more effective! As with most things, this doesn't affect me!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: myronman3, John T., HD1911 and 1 other person
    #31
    Bullfrog08 said:
    Any woman that post/sends nudes to someone and they end up on the web......too bad!

    I have always wondered how these people that take celebs and photoshop their head on a nude body get away with it. I mean, you are really jacking with their character, and had always seemed like a libel suit in the making. All sounds like free speech until it is your daughter or family.
    Click to expand...
    Celebrities have a much higher bar to prove libel/slander than a private individual. Let’s face it, nobody would have ever heard of Kim Kardashian or Paris Hilton if they hadn’t leaked sex tapes.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: W54/XM-388
    #32
    I'm seeing several "if you don't want it to be all over the internet, don't take the pictures" posts.

    I agree...but that's not the intent of the post from what I'm seeing (and I've been wrong before).

    I think that the intent here is to show and article where old Ted is trying to prevent someone's [normal] photo from being superimposed into a porn scene (i.e. they never took a photo like that, and it was faked) for the intent of dissemination and harassment. And to that I'm torn over the 1A, which I support more than most people...and what I'd do to the bitch who superimposes a photo of one of my underage daughters into a porn photo to make it look like she's getting railed...and then using it to embarass/harass her - because I'd cripple the MF'er if I got the chance.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: Fx51LP308
    #33
    Death From A Distance said:
    One of the victims had her image super imposed over a porn video. Another victim was video taped while being raped, and that was used for black mail. There are many more like this, where through no fault of their own were victimized. Most have no recourse, and I am not sure the best way to handle this type of victimization.
    Click to expand...
    Vengeance, in a very violent way.
     
    #34
    HD1911 said:
    Vengeance, in a very violent way.
    Click to expand...

    And, it's ironic that someone brings up McKayla Maroney. She, along with several members of that 2012 team (perhaps even the 2016 team) were direct victims of that POS team physician (Larry Nassar) that is doing time now (I hope Life without Parole), but a bunch of the athlestes including Maroney testified against him.

    Update: From the Wiki Article, he has both a Federal Sentence and several State sentences in Michigan, all of which are to be served consecutively with the Federal sentence. A "De Facto" life without parole.

    Enjoy Bubba, there, Lar!
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: HD1911
    #35
    diggler1833 said:
    I'm seeing several "if you don't want it to be all over the internet, don't take the pictures" posts.

    I agree...but that's not the intent of the post from what I'm seeing (and I've been wrong before).

    I think that the intent here is to show and article where old Ted is trying to prevent someone's [normal] photo from being superimposed into a porn scene (i.e. they never took a photo like that, and it was faked) for the intent of dissemination and harassment. And to that I'm torn over the 1A, which I support more than most people...and what I'd do to the bitch who superimposes a photo of one of my underage daughters into a porn photo to make it look like she's getting railed...and then using it to embarass/harass her - because I'd cripple the MF'er if I got the chance.
    Click to expand...


    You forgot to read the rest of the bill...

    Yep government is like that, give you a nice sound bite and then you don't realize what you are actually being pounded with...
     
    • Like
    Reactions: mosin46, myronman3, The D and 2 others
    #36
    W54/XM-388 said:
    You forgot to read the rest of the bill...

    Yep government is like that, give you a nice sound bite and then you don't realize what you are actually being pounded with...
    Click to expand...

    You mean like, you might get held liable for publishing actual nude photos of others who as it says in Section 2, (2), (A), (i - iv): "what is depicted was not voluntarily exposed by the identifiable individual in a public or commercial setting", "publication of the intimate visual depiction-is intended to cause harm, or causes harm..."?

    I read it. I don't understand the benefit of protecting this. It does nothing to protect chicks to take their clothes off for money.

    Regarding digital forgeries, I will rest in what I stated above.

    I'm glad that some may disagree with me. I certainly wouldn't expect a unanimous point of view, and judging by the number of fake tiddy pics that get plastered in the MPT, I might even think that I'm of the minority at times "here".

    I do however dislike that law enforcement agencies etc... are of course, offered protection for certain reasons. I hate that the king and his men get separate rules from everyone else just because they word things to make it sound like they're doing US a favor.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FWoo45 and W54/XM-388
    #37
    diggler1833 said:
    I do however dislike that law enforcement agencies etc... are of course, offered protection for certain reasons. I hate that the king and his men get separate rules from everyone else just because they word things to make it sound like they're doing US a favor.
    Click to expand...
    Without that exception they cannot prosecute or do their jobs.

    Like speeding - if there is no exception in the law to permit the officer to speed, he could never catch up to speeders to write a ticket. Sometimes these things are necessary if you want any law enforcement at all.

    It does not mean that an officer can get away with violating this law outside of doing their job of prosecuting somebody.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: diggler1833
    #38
    Take, for example, child porn.

    In order to prosecute these disgusting perverts, officers must view the porn and collect evidence and even copy it. Access it, provide it to others, like the prosecutor and even the defense attorney, and eventually show it to 12 members of the public sitting in the jury box.

    All of those actions would violate the law if there was not an exception for law enforcement.

    An officer who downloads kiddie porn and has it on his computer can be prosecuted just the same as anybody else (and it has happened). There is no blanket exception.
     
    #39
    Death From A Distance said:
    One of the victims had her image super imposed over a porn video. Another victim was video taped while being raped, and that was used for black mail. There are many more like this, where through no fault of their own were victimized. Most have no recourse, and I am not sure the best way to handle this type of victimization.
    Click to expand...

    All are reprehensible... BUT there is a slippery slope in charging people for posting and sharing images. No matter how disgusting.

    In the same way that a newspaper cannot be blocked from publishing stolen documents (only prosecuted for stealing them)... going after individuals for sharing info is fraught with peril.

    Would much rather see resources put towards finding and prosecuting those who create the material. And there is nothing stopping civil suits against people who post and share crap like this.

    But these folks should be very, very careful what they wish for. It all sounds well and good until you get another Lawfare administration or commies in who use it to destroy the Bill of Rights. And over the last 16 years, we have seen: A. How easy it is. and B. How many people cheer it and say 'yay' while the nation's freedoms swirl down the toilet.

    Sirhr
     
    • Like
    Reactions: BurtG and W54/XM-388
    #40
    Malum Prohibitum said:
    Without that exception they cannot prosecute or do their jobs.

    Like speeding - if there is no exception in the law to permit the officer to speed, he could never catch up to speeders to write a ticket. Sometimes these things are necessary if you want any law enforcement at all.

    It does not mean that an officer can get away with violating this law outside of doing their job of prosecuting somebody.
    Click to expand...

    Funny you mention this... As a (now retired) EMT, in my former State of the PRNJ, I was very familiar with traffic laws and what EMS vehicles could and could not do.Technically, EMS vehicles are like all other vehicles and had to obey all the traffic laws regular motorists had to obey. The only difference being, if you were using red lights and sirens, the other cars had to get out of your way and let you pass. That's all. Technically, you can't even exceed the speed limit, although most LEAs will cut you some slack as long as you keep it to no more than 10 miles over the limit, and you don't cause any accidents.

    Per NJ Statutes, there are only two entities in the entire state that may (legally) exceed the posted speed limit and under careful restrictions:

    1) The Military - In times of war, riot or insurrection;

    2) A Law Enforcement Officer "When in pursuit of a violator."

    Other than that, no one may (technically) exceed the speed limit. And, if they do and cause an accident (by speeding or other means), they can get into some serious trouble.
     
    #41
    Right, so there is an exception built into the speeding law to permit a law enforcement officer to do his job.

    That was my only point.

    Same with, for example, child pornography, as I posted above, and the same probably with this bill, although I have not studied its language all that carefully.
     
    #42
    Malum Prohibitum said:
    Right, so there is an exception built into the speeding law to permit a law enforcement officer to do his job.
    Click to expand...

    Only when his/her job involves pursuing violators. Technically/legally, that is. Do they speed? All the time. But if they cause an accident, they can be in a "world of $hit" as Gunny Hartman would say.

    Malum Prohibitum said:
    Same with, for example, child pornography, as I posted above, and the same probably with this bill, although I have not studied its language all that carefully.
    Click to expand...

    Under what circumstances are you permitting this exemption for LEOs? EG. for reviewing evidence or something?
     
    #43
    Fx51LP308 said:
    Some more info coming in. Apparently, the website in question must take down the image within 48 hours of being notified by the complainant. The lady in question with Ted Cruz is a HS senior, but could be 18.
    Click to expand...
    As Jack Nicholson said in 'One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest', 'I don't know doc, when you got that little pink b#$%er staring you in the face, I don't think it's crazy'
     
    #46
    diggler1833 said:
    Oh no! The dudes on here who like sharing beat-off material and pushing the MPT rules with every post are going to have to go to real porn sites to jack off to???

    View attachment 8566602




    ***********

    My next question is: Will it be illegal to remove Big Mike's penis bump on all of the meme's now?



    Just wondering...
    Click to expand...
    No but that is real!
     
    #47
    Fx51LP308 said:
    And, it's ironic that someone brings up McKayla Maroney. She, along with several members of that 2012 team (perhaps even the 2016 team) were direct victims of that POS team physician (Larry Nassar) that is doing time now (I hope Life without Parole), but a bunch of the athlestes including Maroney testified against him.

    Update: From the Wiki Article, he has both a Federal Sentence and several State sentences in Michigan, all of which are to be served consecutively with the Federal sentence. A "De Facto" life without parole.

    Enjoy Bubba, there, Lar!
    Click to expand...
    She is supposedly a victim yet took nude photos of herself, promoted herself all over IG in provocative attire/poses and is presently promoting herself as a born again Christian. The girl is nuts. FYI, I take the meetoo thing with a grain of salt, convicted or not.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: BurtG
    #49
    DOA said:
    She is supposedly a victim yet took nude photos of herself, promoted herself all over IG in provocative attire/poses and is presently promoting herself as a born again Christian. The girl is nuts. FYI, I take the meetoo thing with a grain of salt, convicted or not.
    Click to expand...


    Well, do not go to thefappening and search her name.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Similar threads

    Lowlight
    All of Facebook's Banned Content in One Place
    Replies
    58
    Views
    17K
    Ronws
    Ronws
    Top Bottom
    Back
    Home
    Forums
    Merch
    Alerts