Did you miss the small increments part?
Where is the shift? Seems both detectable in a small increment and small shot sample.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did you miss the small increments part?
Where is the shift? Seems both detectable in a small increment and small shot sample.
You seem to know a lot about OCW. How much experience do you have with it?“Seems” - small sample size conformation bias
Enough to know that variance in group size controls with 5 shot groups. I’ve tried OCW with a 6GT and 6.5CM. I used to be the 3-5 shot group/look for nodes camp. Dogma and confirmation bias are powerful things lol. Once I started playing with tuners and shooting larger sample size groups I realized it’s not repeatable.You seem to know a lot about OCW. How much experience do you have with it?
Yes, I agree with your suggestion. Feel free to post your targets and what you think you should do next. Hopefully the majority of responses will agree with you or steer you in the right direction. Good luck.Im still new with the OCW and have some Tagetes I need to post for your alls review also so I can learn.
If my understanding is correct....And please someone correct me if I am wrong so I can learn as well.
In the targets listed by the OP I would be looking at loads from 43.1-43.5. With the middle of that being 43.3 then doing a seating depth test to determine best length.
Am I on the right track?
I don't have any opinions on what you said, yet. but how do you think Tac Ops tune their rifle to the FGMM ammo?Tuners don’t work. It’s been proven. Lol.
Are you testing a tuner?I don't have any opinions on what you said, yet. but how do you think Tac Ops tune their rifle to the FGMM ammo?
no it's a rifle without the tuner.Are you testing a tuner?
They probably shoot 3-5 groups and find a setting they think is good but it’s just random distribution of group sizes…..