Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm still expecting Kamala to take over to give Joe his pardon.we'll see where this goes.
Pardon probably in January
I think if he wants that, he'd play the pardon himself game. If he relinquished expecting a pardon, she'd renege on it out of spite. I really do think they fucking hate each other and have zero trust between the two of them. Deservedly so.I'm still expecting Kamala to take over to give Joe his pardon.
They used each other. Then she stabbed him in the back. They definitely deserve each other. Besides, neither truly cares about the country.I think if he wants that, he'd play the pardon himself game. If he relinquished expecting a pardon, she'd renege on it out of spite. I really do think they fucking hate each other and have zero trust between the two of them. Deservedly so.
Stupid or complicit? Nobody's that fucking dumb, not even the GOP.Stupid gop. Keep your mouth shut another month. Now Brandon will pardon her.
It's never about the country for dems over the last 40 years (maybe even 60 going back to LBJ, but I give Carter a slight benefit of doubt), they would literally wipe their ass with the Constitution if they could get away with it. It's always about control.They used each other. Then she stabbed him in the back. They definitely deserve each other. Besides, neither truly cares about the country.
Why? She's the princess of the uniparty and essentially a dem herself, same as her father. See my post above for reasons.If a Democrat pardons a Cheney I'm pretty sure there will be a tear in the space/time continuum somewhere.
The RINOs take care of their own.Stupid gop. Keep your mouth shut another month. Now Brandon will pardon her.
The plan is workingStupid gop. Keep your mouth shut another month. Now Brandon will pardon her.
After an openly criminal regime called the Biden Administration highjacked the government for four years, raking in millions of taxpayer money and doing irreparable damage to the U.S. they change the pardon rules. But not before the Bidens and other criminals are allowed to just walk away with their pardons, and taxpayer's millions.Let them go ahead and set new standards for pardons. 2 can play at that game and we may need to use that in a few years to get some things done. What does it matter? They already do lots of illegal stuff all the time. We have a chance to fundamentally change government and we actually have some people who have the power AND want to do it.
After an openly criminal regime called the Biden Administration highjacked the government for four years, raking in billions of taxpayer money and doing irreparable damage to the U.S. they change the pardon rules. But not before the Bidens and other criminals are allowed to just walk away with their pardons.
After an openly criminal regime called the Biden Administration highjacked the government for four years, raking in billions of taxpayer money and doing irreparable damage to the U.S. they change the pardon rules. But not before the Bidens and other criminals are allowed to just walk away with their pardons.
Trump should give 1000 people blanket pardons for the next 4 years and fucking turn them loose.
Trump should give 1000 people blanket pardons for the next 4 years and fucking turn them loose.
Why would she need to? As current and soon to be former POTUS, he is immune from any prosecution for anything, ever. Thanks SCOTUS.I'm still expecting Kamala to take over to give Joe his pardon.
You don’t believe that do you? Rules on paper, they’re all subject to change. Or ignored. Or erased.Why would she need to? As current and soon to be former POTUS, he is immune from any prosecution for anything, ever. Thanks SCOTUS.
uh scotus said immune in their official capacity as President. Joe was money laundering and racketeering and all kinds of RICO while VP.Why would she need to? As current and soon to be former POTUS, he is immune from any prosecution for anything, ever. Thanks SCOTUS.
This is how I know you didn’t actually read the majority opinion.Why would she need to? As current and soon to be former POTUS, he is immune from any prosecution for anything, ever. Thanks SCOTUS.
True. Not much that can or will be done about it, so we may as well use it and reforming it all may well require it. Yes they are super criminals but the only way we have any chance to do anything about it is to remake government, which we can and may need this new idea of pardon power to do because they will absolutely come after us for doing it if we do anything meaningful.After an openly criminal regime called the Biden Administration highjacked the government for four years, raking in millions of taxpayer money and doing irreparable damage to the U.S. they change the pardon rules. But not before the Bidens and other criminals are allowed to just walk away with their pardons, and taxpayer's millions.
I think he will. She made that deal when she went out and did a 180 on everything she'd said and done her whole life on the campaign trail for that brainless kamala.If Biden pardons the J6 committee, then it should be open season on pardons for anybody with anything to do with J6 when Trump takes office.
I actually don’t think he will pardon her. Biden has an enormous ego. He didn’t even want to burn political capital to pardon his son until he had no choice, and don’t forget that pardon was just as much about protecting himself. What does he stand to gain by protecting Liz Cheney? I think he’ll let her burn because she is a “Republican” and he’s been a Dem for 40 years.
The only person a Democrat hates more than Trump is a Cheney. lolWhy? She's the princess of the uniparty and essentially a dem herself, same as her father. See my post above for reasons.
The republicants will. They are going to be "outraged" at what this regime has done and will pass a bill to prevent this kind of thing from ever happening again.who changed what rules?
Why? She's the princess of the uniparty and essentially a dem herself, same as her father. See my post above for reasons.
It's exactly the opposite of what you think. By accepting a pardon, you are admitting guilt to the crime, even if you've not actually been tried, or even charged for the crime. Accepting a pardon before you've been charged or convicted can bite you on the ass.This pardoning stuff is out of control just like everything else in the Biden crime administration; it’s adding to the anarchy.
If you look at the definition of pardoning, it is always tied to a crime or offense that was committed; the commission of the crime or offense is not in question, it’s an assumed fact. Technically, in my opinion, which doesn’t matter to the criminals in charge, you can’t pardon someone for a crime they are not convicted of.
![]()
Definition of PARDON
indulgence; the excusing of an offense without exacting a penalty; a release from the legal penalties of an offense… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
And yes, the GOP is run by idiots too.
According to Burdick v. United States, 236 U.S. 79 (1915):
There are substantial differences between legislative immunity and a pardon; the latter carries an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it...
To do it right, to expunge guilt, he should offer an amnesty (not sure the legal process for an amnesty) :
There is a distinction between amnesty and pardon; the former overlooks the offense, and is usually addressed to crimes against the sovereignty of the state and political offenses...
Do you think that the person actually cares? We're not talking about people with high morals.It's exactly the opposite of what you think. By accepting a pardon, you are admitting guilt to the crime, even if you've not actually been tried, or even charged for the crime. Accepting a pardon before you've been charged or convicted can bite you on the ass.
I strongly encourage you to reread section III A of the majority opinion with specific attention paid to the concepts of “outer perimeter”, the restriction on courts to inquire as to a president’s motives, and the idea that illegality does not make an act unofficial. No president, sitting or “ex” will be prosecuted for anything as long as this SCOTUS’ opinion stands.This is how I know you didn’t actually read the majority opinion.
SCOTUS set up that perimeter(if I remember correctly) to prevent frivolous litigation from being used to circumvent executive privilege.I strongly encourage you to reread section III A of the majority opinion with specific attention paid to the concepts of “outer perimeter”, the restriction on courts to inquire as to a president’s motives, and the idea that illegality does not make an act unofficial. No president, sitting or “ex” will be prosecuted for anything as long as this SCOTUS’ opinion stands.
Regarding Biden’s actions as VP (or senator before that) there’s no political will to follow that lead. As much as the current punditry likes to bluster about the coming storm of prosecution, ASGH. As they say.
Whatever about Liz Cheny... but how in the world did she commit a criminal act? That doesn't make sense.
I believe it was coaching and/or tampering with witnesses and withholding evidence.
Sirhr
Evidence tampering destruction and or manipulation. Also 1984 deprivation of rights charges - knowing the truth having the evidence and hiding / destroying it so a prosecution can happen .Whatever about Liz Cheny... but how in the world did she commit a criminal act? That doesn't make sense.
Liz Cheney and her sneering old man need to be tossed into the Traitor Chipper.Evidence tampering destruction and or manipulation. Also 1984 deprivation of rights charges - knowing the truth having the evidence and hiding / destroying it so a prosecution can happen .
Yeah, that would all make sense. The real problem has been the constant Lawfare that’s been engaged in both directions… Especially coming out of the far leftI believe it was coaching and/or tampering with witnesses and withholding evidence.
If she is convicted it might lead To the overturning of all the J6 farce convictions. Have to get a lawyer to chime in. But seems to me that none of it can be trusted if she tampered the evidence.
Sirhr
Whatever about Liz Cheny... but how in the world did she commit a criminal act? That doesn't make sense.
No she will probably go back after Zimmerman on the federal level instead.Also destroying government records.
Lots of shady / criminal shit went on in /with the Jan 6 Comm.
The 50 mil. question is ............will Pam Bondie prosecute...........I ain't holdin my breath
that's why they tried to sneak this into the cr bill. they could deny or block any subpoenas for incriminating evidence.Just came over the ticker on NEwsmax Liz Cheney has been referred for criminal prosecution over Jan 6 committee.