The Problem With Pam Bondi

That's it. We should have voted for Harris and things would be better for the future of our country...

None of them are perfect. None. But I think Trump is much better than the others. I don't see us losing ground with him as we definitely would wit Harris. Perhaps, we might even gain some ground with Trump. We'll have to see.
 
That's it. We should have voted for Harris and things would be better for the future of our country...
Go back a little further. A lot of other options. And DJT refused to participate. And you KNOW why.

IMG_0250.jpeg
 
nobody that's going to be in any of these positions...

Trump is our friend:

 
I will save you some reading with a couple of videos:





Here is a link to some information that the Gun Owners of America produced. At the end of the article is a linked request to sign a e-letter to your senators. You will have the ability to edit the letter. And, of course, after submitting the letter GOA will ask for a donation. You don't have to give a donation but I did anyway. GOA has never backed down with fighting for our 2A rights. A small donation is the least we can do for an organization that doesn't compromise.


Video guy is simply an awful clickbaiter. Was decent at one time, years ago. Now just. Click bait & many refuse to watch because of such.

GOA is a decent org...
 
Relax everybody she will do what Trump tells her to do. And also relax about gun control. Trumps 2 sons are bigger gun enthusiasts than almost anyone of you. Trust me they will be looking out for us with his dad. Trump is not a gun guy at all but his kids are world class.
Yeah his Supreme Court picks , brace and red flag bs really show that
 
  • Like
Reactions: doubloon
If you were in charge of law enforcement/public safety how would you deal with a wackjob posting threats on social media? Sit on him with a surveillance team for weeks? Do nothing?
You either support the constitution including the 1st or you dont

Constitutional carry solves the whack job problems quickly.

Example out of 87000. The theater shooter going past all the theaters that banned guns.

Make it so anyone not in jail can carry a firearm anywhere. Crime goes to near zero
 
Unfortunately that is what has happened at EVERY one of these mass shootings. They always find an online profile that tells of the coming violence. Also, they always find out that the police did talk to the perp and decided he or she wasn’t really a problem.
And all the mass shootings are where you can’t legally have a gun.

It’s a bs argument

Like I said. .gov is organized crime. Creates a problem then comes along with the solution.
 
You either support the constitution including the 1st or you dont

Constitutional carry solves the whack job problems quickly.

Example out of 87000. The theater shooter going past all the theaters that banned guns.

Make it so anyone not in jail can carry a firearm anywhere. Crime goes to near zero

It doesn’t. You have a mistaken belief that everyone would carry a gun if it were legal. 5% would, maybe. It wouldn’t stop crime. It wouldn’t stop mass shootings. What it would do is give people a fighting chance. The wackjob would still do his thing.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Skunk and BurtG
The whack job doesn’t know who is carrying.

They are pussies. It would vastly reduce mass shootings


You know who enables mass shooters ? Cops. Enforcing clearly unconstitutional laws. Making sure people are unarmed victims. While those wife beating pussies hide outside like ulvade Columbine florida etc

You are very naive. Cops don’t enable anything. Mass shooters are enabled by something else. And I don’t want to get into it here as there is no evidence for it that we have access to. If you pay attention to these things you will remember one a couple years ago where the soon to be “active shooter” offed himself near the soon to be crime scene and left a note saying something to the effect that he was not a killer. Do the math.
 
Lol yeah. Making sure the victims are disarmed and kidnapping them if they dare arm themselves doesn’t help the mass shooters at all lol

I never said it doesn’t factor into the equation. But it certainly doesn’t enable it. How many mass shootings occurred in FL before CCW was legal and after CCW was legalized?
 
Off topic, but I’m already kind of regretting voting for Trump. Not like I had a good option otherwise, but damn it would be nice to have some leaders that were for the Constitution and didn’t change their minds with the wind. Trump, for example, is now all about trying to put us on some crypto currency. He was all against it last term, but now seems to be all about it. Yeah, they get us on a digital currency then its game over. I cannot believe the people praising this shit.
 
Off topic, but I’m already kind of regretting voting for Trump. Not like I had a good option otherwise, but damn it would be nice to have some leaders that were for the Constitution and didn’t change their minds with the wind. Trump, for example, is now all about trying to put us on some crypto currency. He was all against it last term, but now seems to be all about it. Yeah, they get us on a digital currency then its game over. I cannot believe the people praising this shit.
LOL.. yea, cause the other Choice for the Dems.. was so much better....
hahahahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 2nd A rights ahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 1A rights....... hahahah
45billion dollars and how many people she get on cable? lol
30billion and Pete got how many? 8 charger machines....... hahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your ......kids future........hahaha
Kamaaala would of lowered gas prices
Kamaaala would of lowered food costs
Kamaaala would of lowered illegals invading the USA
Yup... and BTW, who's been running/ruining the country the last 4 years.. cause diaper man sure wasn't
..
you have the freedom to run for President if you qualify. you have 4 years to get ready.. go
 
You would think there would be less mass shootings after everyone was packing, right? Because wackjobs are pussies, right?
How many were in victim disarmament zones ?


How many were because of the violent ones ?

9FC81C2D-3EF9-4B59-9B04-8CD524DBA57C.jpeg

10390506-2F0E-4D07-B0DD-4CE42FB03C19.jpeg


Oh and .gov caused them to be so violent. Destroyed the family with welfare then cia flooded the cities with crack
 
Off topic, but I’m already kind of regretting voting for Trump. Not like I had a good option otherwise, but damn it would be nice to have some leaders that were for the Constitution and didn’t change their minds with the wind. Trump, for example, is now all about trying to put us on some crypto currency. He was all against it last term, but now seems to be all about it. Yeah, they get us on a digital currency then its game over. I cannot believe the people praising this shit.
you are right. but; can you believe that people use a debit card for everything,buying a drink @ 7-11,are unable to drive anywhere new without GPS,that have actual withdrawal when their cell phone is taken,that one can not function in this society without a computer,that the homeless all seem to have cell phones? the absolute take over of society by the big tech companies is one that people do not understand.
yes,i use a comp like everyone else. in thinking about it,i have come to the conclusion that any benefit from said takeover is dwarfed by the vulnerabilities,loss of privacy and freedom,and added costs that have ensued from that.
 
LOL.. yea, cause the other Choice for the Dems.. was so much better....
hahahahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 2nd A rights ahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 1A rights....... hahahah
45billion dollars and how many people she get on cable? lol
30billion and Pete got how many? 8 charger machines....... hahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your ......kids future........hahaha
Kamaaala would of lowered gas prices
Kamaaala would of lowered food costs
Kamaaala would of lowered illegals invading the USA
Yup... and BTW, who's been running/ruining the country the last 4 years.. cause diaper man sure wasn't
..
you have the freedom to run for President if you qualify. you have 4 years to get ready.. go
When did I ever say I would vote for Kamala? I’m just skeptical of Trump. Despite his bumpstock crap, he was, as far as I’m concerned, the best president in my lifetime. But, he doesn’t seem to have learned much from his first tenure and im super Leary of people that change their minds on things with ease. People that do that says to me that you are easily influenced or ignorant. And for those that think everything is gonna go in your favor because Eric is a hunter and blah blah, need I remind you of all the backing the HPA got that everyone was all gung ho about because Eric supported that, and well we see how that went and where the bumpstock stuff went.

No Kamala would have been the absolute final nail for sure, worst choice ever, but I remain skeptical of Trump this go around. Trust is earned. And bringing us into a digital currency where they will easily be able to control every aspect of your life, has my support for him, waning very quickly. Many say it’s gonna happen anyways. Maybe. But if it happens, then the great exp is done. And it’l might not start off as control, but it will end up there.

you are right. but; can you believe that people use a debit card for everything,buying a drink @ 7-11,are unable to drive anywhere new without GPS,that have actual withdrawal when their cell phone is taken,that one can not function in this society without a computer,that the homeless all seem to have cell phones? the absolute take over of society by the big tech companies is one that people do not understand.
yes,i use a comp like everyone else. in thinking about it,i have come to the conclusion that any benefit from said takeover is dwarfed by the vulnerabilities,loss of privacy and freedom,and added costs that have ensued from that.

Exactly. To be honest, it’s already over, it’s just that most haven’t figured it out yet. Go look at the charts of the past 10 generations and see which ones start to identify with this LGBTQ BS over time. They’ve already won. The future generations are too far gone and lack the ability to think for themselves. 20% of GEN Z apparently identify as some kind of LGBTQ crap. I suspect that number to grow even more over the next couple gens as they become more controlled by tech and social media. And don’t worry during that time the Muslims will have outbred any modern western civilizations and taken over by sheer numbers alone. I’m sure they will treat the LGBTQ people with kindness. It will all be ok. Lmao. Yeah it’s already gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
How many were in victim disarmament zones ?


How many were because of the violent ones ?

View attachment 8595893
View attachment 8595894

Oh and .gov caused them to be so violent. Destroyed the family with welfare then cia flooded the cities with crack
heard these elsewhere. the question is that i only remember 1 mass shooter who was black,the DC shooter. as i recall most of the auto crash killers are black or muslim. not sure if that is right or what it means. the crack flood and welfare are for sure reasons for those #s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
So what she said was that the police were going to be able to seize the guns at the same time the owner was being taken into custody on a mental health hold. The phone app thing concerned anonymous reporting of behavior that warranted a mental health hold. They were not talking about seizure of guns based solely on an anonymous complaint.

If the Psychologist says I am good to go, who is an elected, or public servant, to say otherwise. She also said the Baker Act in Florida was over 1000 pages, and weak.
Over a thousand pages of legalese that they believe needs to be strengthened? That should scare the shit out of all of us.
 
  • Love
Reactions: SilentStalkr
begin to think that ANY pol or bureaucrat is highly swampy. there are exceptions-maybe 5% +/- .the only defense there is inside the system is that the less swampy see a chance to retain power by selling that to conserv voters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BurtG
LOL.. yea, cause the other Choice for the Dems.. was so much better....
hahahahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 2nd A rights ahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your 1A rights....... hahahah
45billion dollars and how many people she get on cable? lol
30billion and Pete got how many? 8 charger machines....... hahahah
Kamaaala would of protected your ......kids future........hahaha
Kamaaala would of lowered gas prices
Kamaaala would of lowered food costs
Kamaaala would of lowered illegals invading the USA
Yup... and BTW, who's been running/ruining the country the last 4 years.. cause diaper man sure wasn't
..
you have the freedom to run for President if you qualify. you have 4 years to get ready.. go
Kamaaala didn’t teach you contractions, did she? Fucking up once in a post is okay but 6 times? Don’t blame autocorrect.

Grammar is serious business.
 
heard these elsewhere. the question is that i only remember 1 mass shooter who was black,the DC shooter. as i recall most of the auto crash killers are black or muslim. not sure if that is right or what it means. the crack flood and welfare are for sure reasons for those #s.
Well they define a mass shooting as 4 or more shot. Mass killing as 4 or more dead

So bangers doing banger stuff catches a lot of that

Contrary to media saturation , there aren’t many random shoot a bunch of people shooters
 
I see a lot of near lifer, swampy shit in this picture. All questionable as a matter of fact (some more than others)
Most are far more pro-2A than Trump. But my reply was to the assertion that the only choice was Kamala (or another dem).

And Trump does not have to keep anyone happy anymore. He is putting in place a bunch of yes sir robots, and he can't run again...so he will do exactly what he wants when he wants. And what you want will never factor into that...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46
We have a lot of Village People fans here? Not long ago, I would imagine anyone admitting such would have been ridiculed into oblivion.

The "Village People" were the only ones that let him use their song at his rallies. He had gone through the Rolling Stones ("You can't always get what you want") and then Sam & Dave ("Hold on... I'm Comming") but got Cease and Desist orders from both groups. (How ironic that Sam Moore of Sam & Dave passed away not more than 10 days ago).

Although, I would have thought that with Trump's love for the Military, he would have used the Village People's "In the Navy..."

 
The "Village People" were the only ones that let him use their song at his rallies. He had gone through the Rolling Stones ("You can't always get what you want") and then Sam & Dave ("Hold on... I'm Comming") but got Cease and Desist orders from both groups. (How ironic that Sam Moore of Sam & Dave passed away not more than 10 days ago).

Although, I would have thought that with Trump's love for the Military, he would have used the Village People's "In the Navy..."


Bull. He could have asked to use any number of musicians music. And he uses many others. He chose the Village People. You a VP fan? You do the "YMCA dance"? I guess the Gay Anthem is a big win here.
 
Bull. He could have asked to use any number of musicians music. And he uses many others. He chose the Village People.

And he did it for a reason. Look at how popular it is and how he made it even popular. The man knows how to market himself.

You a VP fan? You do the "YMCA dance"? I guess the Gay Anthem is a big win here.

Not at all. Don't do the dance, ever.
 
And he did it for a reason. Look at how popular it is and how he made it even popular. The man knows how to market himself.
Perhaps you have forgotten what you said:

The "Village People" were the only ones that let him use their song at his rallies.

This is what I replied to. Pick a statement and defend it. :rolleyes:

But you are absolutely correct, he can market himself. And the masses lap it up like milk and honey. :rolleyes:

And now Donny is pushing crypto...he is selling his own meme coin, as is Melania. Kind a like the Hawk Tuah girl. We should all be proud.

 
Last edited:
Bondi needs to go.

And I stand by saying come and infringe on my 2A rights...and I'll stand by anyone else as well that feels the same. It's a rather big group I tend to think.
 
Bondi needs to go.

And I stand by saying come and infringe on my 2A rights...and I'll stand by anyone else as well that feels the same. It's a rather big group I tend to think.

But, apparently, not "big" enough to get the attention of the politicians. If we could only "primary" a few of their a$$es in 2026, maybe they'll pay us more attention. Or if we win some litigation against them. I have yet to see a decent Red-Flag lawsuit brought to bear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mosin46 and mettee
But, apparently, not "big" enough to get the attention of the politicians. If we could only "primary" a few of their a$$es in 2026, maybe they'll pay us more attention. Or if we win some litigation against them. I have yet to see a decent Red-Flag lawsuit brought to bear.

I agree, it's going to take work.

I think it has the attention of certain politicians, because they know they won't be able to take away the rights(illegally and without just cause) without loss. I think they do assume people will stand up. Once they/we have to stand up, this would go pretty quickly because I feel like a coward will always turn and run. I find some comfort in that.
 
I agree, it's going to take work.

I think it has the attention of certain politicians, because they know they won't be able to take away the rights(illegally and without just cause) without loss. I think they do assume people will stand up. Once they/we have to stand up, this would go pretty quickly because I feel like a coward will always turn and run. I find some comfort in that.

It needs to be somebody noticeable like the FL House Speaker FL Sen. President. The ones that continuously prohibit pro-2A bills from reaching the floor. I would also recommend splitting apart some bills to prevent a "Christmas Tree" problem. I think HB 31 in FL (or whichever it is) that combined things like OC, repealing Red Flag laws etc. etc. failed where, if it had been broken up into individual components, some of them had a better shot at passing. But I think those politicians are too much into the pockets of "The Rodent" and the FRF as well as the Sheriff's assoc. Perhaps, also, some private citizen groups that still think the "Amish" will run ruff-shot on them if they can OC. I dunno.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mettee