KRG Bravo + Area419 ARCA Rail?

Are you trying to keep weight down for NRL22? If not, the replacement non-enclosed forend with Arca is a good upgrade for the bravo. It is one piece, adds some more attachment points but does add over a pound to the rifle's weight.

12” is 3” of overhang, I think I’d rather get a spigot. Can’t say it would flex too much or be too much like a diving board but the add on arca would keep the center of gravity a fair higher. I keep the bipod on the spigot for the most part.

spife7980 said:

12” is 3” of overhang, I think I’d rather get a spigot. Can’t say it would flex too much or be too much like a diving board but the add on arca would keep the center of gravity a fair higher. I keep the bipod on the spigot for the most part.
View attachment 8602791

Click to expand...

The spigot is nice for keeping the rifle's center of gravity a bit lower. The only issue I have is you can't quickly slide your bipod back quickly say if you want to get front and rear support on a small rest/prop.

Given how challenging it can be to get the balance point on a B-14R forward of the magazine well, I'd actually consider a thick steel 13" ARCA rail from someone like 360 Precision: https://360precision.com/product/m-lok-arca-rail/

I wouldn't think twice about a 13" rail sticking out past the forend. The thing is going to be pretty rigid, and this isn't a high stress system. I personally don't have my bipod any further forward than I can reach for adjustments anyway (so I don't have the bipod beyond the supported forend), and all the extra steel out front does wonders for balance when you're on a positional stage. Depeding on clearance between the exposed rail and the barrel, you should also have room to attach additional weight above the rail.