• Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support
  • You Should Now Be Receiving Emails!

    The email issued mentioned earlier this week is now fixed! You may also have received previous emails that were meant to be sent over the last few days - apologies, this was a one time issue and shouldn't happen again!

Us aid @$&?ing Gone…

i0ZoiR4IVZ3E.jpeg
 
This headline is very misleading:

Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze

Judges can’t “Find” anything by themselves. For judges to “Find” they have to have a case brought to them first – plaintiffs.

In this particular case these are the Plaintiffs:

STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI’I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; and STATE OF WISCONSIN,

Plaintiffs,

All “democrat” states some of which Trump won or came close.

The judge writes (in bold is mine):

The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional…..”

"Likely
" does not cut it!! And he, in the names of the plaintiffs, is trying to subversively attack the will of the people. A ruse.
 
This headline is very misleading:

Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze

Judges can’t “Find” anything by themselves. For judges to “Find” they have to have a case brought to them first – plaintiffs.

In this particular case these are the Plaintiffs:

STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI’I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; and STATE OF WISCONSIN,

Plaintiffs,

All “democrat” states some of which Trump won or came close.

The judge writes (in bold is mine):

The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional…..”

"Likely
" does not cut it!! And he, in the names of the plaintiffs, is trying to subversively attack the will of the people. A ruse.
And there is more:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888975398299435477.html

"Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), judges can issue injunctions “ONLY IF” the suing party posts a bond to cover potential damages if they’re wrong. But guess what? This rule is hardly used!

When I was in the White House, in Trump’s first term, I suggested this, but DOJ didn’t make it happen. Imagine if we had applied this to the travel ban – activists would think twice before blocking policies with potentially billions at stake.

For national injunctions, we’re talking bonds in the hundreds of millions or even billions. It will become prohibitive unless the activists have a slam dunk case."
 
Yeah I don't see how anyone could be anti-Trump at this point unless they're corrupt or deranged.
I can’t find the quote that summed it up , but basically , gov is these peoples god and trumpIs dismantling it. And most are on the government tit either through welfare gov “jobs” unions ngo etc
 
He's another retarded weirdo too.

Wasn’t he diddling children or lighting them on fire or something on Epstein Island?

Yeah Mr. Saving Private Ryan… we know how you
Roll. It’s more Bosom Buddies than Band of Brothers….

Sirhr
 
A precedent has been set by the far left, actually AOC. Not that long ago she said the executive branch (president) can ignore the rulings of the courts if the executive branch "feels" said rulings are wrong. Biden did just that, now it's DJT turn.
Like they did with student loans
 
When are the dots going to connect to Schumer, Schitt, Piglosi, Romney, McStain, Pochohontas, Sanders, Clintons etal.

Billions upon billions of dollars being fleeced and sent oversees, so you know there are kickbacks . What that money could have done in the USA.

SMDH at the scope of the waste, graft, and corruption. Un- fucking believable.
 
Last edited:
When are the dots going to connect to Schumer, Schitt, Piglosi, Romney, McStain, Pochohontas, etal.

Billions upon billions of dollars being fleeced and sent oversees, so you know there are kickbacks . What that money could have done in the USA.

SMDH at the scope of the waste, graft, and corruption. Un- fucking believable.
Fleeced directly into secret accounts!