-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
Us aid @$&?ing Gone…
- Thread starter sirhrmechanic
- Start date
Thats sound good they lost their jobs but our commie government should had never hired them in the first place!
sounds nuts.
Lets see some charges against this bitch!
Do you know what the French did when they found their government was robbing the coffers?
They cut their heads off!
They cut their heads off!
I believe they cut the heads off of others, but the point is well taken.
Guillotines draw larger Livestream crowds.
Ppv so we can simultaneously pay off the national debt
Dumb ugly girl cant even back that up! Just like Hitlery just lies and no facts to back it up.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. A guillotine above a giant Plinko board so we can place bets on where the head lands.
no wonder so many lawyers are fucking shitstains.
Registered independent? That’s like saying she’s “decidedly undecided…”
Just like there's only two genders, You either a republican or dumb fucking Dimwit!
McShitstain and graham and bush etc are republicans
You’re either a trump supporter / tea party / libertarian type.
Or
You’re a big gov Commie / statist.
This headline is very misleading:
Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze
Judges can’t “Find” anything by themselves. For judges to “Find” they have to have a case brought to them first – plaintiffs.
In this particular case these are the Plaintiffs:
STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI’I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
All “democrat” states some of which Trump won or came close.
The judge writes (in bold is mine):
“The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional…..”
"Likely" does not cut it!! And he, in the names of the plaintiffs, is trying to subversively attack the will of the people. A ruse.
Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze
Judges can’t “Find” anything by themselves. For judges to “Find” they have to have a case brought to them first – plaintiffs.
In this particular case these are the Plaintiffs:
STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF ILLINOIS; STATE OF RHODE ISLAND; STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI’I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MICHIGAN; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF OREGON; STATE OF VERMONT; STATE OF WASHINGTON; and STATE OF WISCONSIN,
Plaintiffs,
All “democrat” states some of which Trump won or came close.
The judge writes (in bold is mine):
“The broad categorical and sweeping freeze of federal funds is, as the Court found, likely unconstitutional…..”
"Likely" does not cut it!! And he, in the names of the plaintiffs, is trying to subversively attack the will of the people. A ruse.
And there is more:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1888975398299435477.html
"Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c), judges can issue injunctions “ONLY IF” the suing party posts a bond to cover potential damages if they’re wrong. But guess what? This rule is hardly used!
When I was in the White House, in Trump’s first term, I suggested this, but DOJ didn’t make it happen. Imagine if we had applied this to the travel ban – activists would think twice before blocking policies with potentially billions at stake.
For national injunctions, we’re talking bonds in the hundreds of millions or even billions. It will become prohibitive unless the activists have a slam dunk case."
Yeah I don't see how anyone could be anti-Trump at this point unless they're corrupt or deranged.
I can’t find the quote that summed it up , but basically , gov is these peoples god and trumpIs dismantling it. And most are on the government tit either through welfare gov “jobs” unions ngo etc
^ Early Life ?
Yup
Every. Single. Time
Yup
Every. Single. Time
Chilling info on Jamie Raskin's wife might explain why he's fighting DOGE... - Revolver News
Now, it's all making sense.
revolver.news
Did I miss something??
The last "administration" Did what ever the hell they wanted, with or without congress.
The last "administration" Did what ever the hell they wanted, with or without congress.
Wasn’t he diddling children or lighting them on fire or something on Epstein Island?
Yeah Mr. Saving Private Ryan… we know how you
Roll. It’s more Bosom Buddies than Band of Brothers….
Sirhr
A precedent has been set by the far left, actually AOC. Not that long ago she said the executive branch (president) can ignore the rulings of the courts if the executive branch "feels" said rulings are wrong. Biden did just that, now it's DJT turn.
Like they did with student loans
Yes and Brandon bragged about ignoring the SCOTUS.
When are the dots going to connect to Schumer, Schitt, Piglosi, Romney, McStain, Pochohontas, Sanders, Clintons etal.
Billions upon billions of dollars being fleeced and sent oversees, so you know there are kickbacks . What that money could have done in the USA.
SMDH at the scope of the waste, graft, and corruption. Un- fucking believable.
Billions upon billions of dollars being fleeced and sent oversees, so you know there are kickbacks . What that money could have done in the USA.
SMDH at the scope of the waste, graft, and corruption. Un- fucking believable.
Last edited:
