• Get 30% off the first 3 months with code HIDE30

    Offer valid until 9/23! If you have an annual subscription on Sniper's Hide, subscribe below and you'll be refunded the difference.

    Subscribe
  • Having trouble using the site?

    Contact support

Help with scope base removal on old Remington 700

TheHebrewHammer

Supporter
Supporter
Full Member
Minuteman
May 1, 2021
1,129
1,025
The South
I am trying to take off an old Redfield scope of a family heirloom Remington 700 and upgrade it to some good glass. It appears there is a screw still holding in this base but I have no concept of how to get to it. It appears to be under the front scope ring but again, I have no idea how to get to it in order to remove the base. I am probably having a short bus moment. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 20210723_105645.jpg
    20210723_105645.jpg
    311 KB · Views: 225
  • 20210723_105641.jpg
    20210723_105641.jpg
    304.4 KB · Views: 212
  • 20210723_105634.jpg
    20210723_105634.jpg
    300.6 KB · Views: 312
  • 20210723_105631.jpg
    20210723_105631.jpg
    442.6 KB · Views: 236
  • 20210723_105625.jpg
    20210723_105625.jpg
    375.6 KB · Views: 421
Great rifle BTW. Flat safety and a serial number in the 200k's. I am guessing late 60's build date? I have two ADL's in the same age range. An 06 my Dad bought new in 1964 and a 270 I bought in like new condition in 1994. Happy shooting!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHebrewHammer
Great rifle BTW. Flat safety and a serial number in the 200k's. I am guessing late 60's build date? I have two ADL's in the same age range. An 06 my Dad bought new in 1964 and a 270 I bought in like new condition in 1994. Happy shooting!
I didnt pay any attention to the s/n, but if it is indeed a pre 1972 beware that there is supposedly a bridge height difference between pre and post '72 Remington 700's...or so I've read.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheHebrewHammer
It looks like a P to me. That would make it a 1967 Assembly date. FWIW I have used Std bases (Leupold) on my 270 (1965) and have not had any problems with zeroing to scopes I have installed. I have never seen a reference to Year of MFG for 700 bases either. Not at all saying Lange Carabine is incorrect I have just never noted any functional issues YMMV. Great looking classic!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHebrewHammer
It looks like a P to me. That would make it a 1967 Assembly date. FWIW I have used Std bases (Leupold) on my 270 (1965) and have not had any problems with zeroing to scopes I have installed. I have never seen a reference to Year of MFG for 700 bases either. Not at all saying Lange Carabine is incorrect I have just never noted any functional issues YMMV. Great looking classic!
Supposedly there's only .017" difference in height, IIRC.
That may not even be enough difference to make any difference, idk.
My source of this information is The Military and Police Sniper by Mike Lau of Texas Brigade Armory fame. I think it's in the chapter on how he builds his M40awhatever clones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHebrewHammer
Supposedly there's only .017" difference in height, IIRC.
That may not even be enough difference to make any difference, idk.
My source of this information is The Military and Police Sniper by Mike Lau of Texas Brigade Armory fame. I think it's in the chapter on how he builds his M40awhatever clones.
I will have to look that book up. It would be interesting to know if it was plus .017" or minus as it relates to the receiver by the recoil lug. It would effectively give you some gain or loss on scope range much like a 20MOA rail. Long actions might be more tolerant of it just due to the extra length of the receiver :unsure:. I enjoy learning these particulars. Thank for sharing it. Down the rabbit hole I go.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheHebrewHammer
Looks pretty good, to my uneducated eye at least.
One easy step to alleviate any stresses in your new picatinny scope base that may not be so easy to see. A little shoe polish on the action as a release agent and jb weld will float any inconsistencies out. 20 minute job not including the drying time.
 
Last edited: