Hi all,
I have done a great deal of research and have gone off of mostly what "tiborasaurusrex" on his YouTube channel has recommended. Pretty much all of his stuff in the "Sniper 101" series (that I have seen so far) makes a lot of sense.
So from his recommendations, which are reasonably old now, a fixed scope is 'tougher' than a variable power.
Regarding make and models, I was thinking of:
SWFA SS 10x42
or
going to the other end of the spectrum with a Schmidt and Bender (S&B) PMII 10x42.
US optics do the FDN FX10 10X42MM but they are more expensive than the S&B for me in Australia- are they as good as a S&B?
I noticed in another forum that the Bushnell Elite Tactical LRS 10x42 Rifle Scope is another option but they aren't listed on their website- are they now redundant, and if not, are they any good?
The SWFA's are a pain to get here in Australia because I'd have to send it to a forwarder such as "Hop-Shop-Go" because of their policies...
And then I saw the following statement on another website and was hoping someone here could verify its credibility:
"The old school benefit of fixed power being sturdier is gone with the newer scope designs/materials/manufacturers."
I have had 2 lower end optics break on me in the last 6 months so I want something bulletproof. My requirements for a scope are that it has to have mil or moa markings (for rangefinding) and turrets designed for constant adjusting. The S&B PMII and SWFA SS are military rated. Do you guys know what else fits into these requirements? Tiborasaurusrex claims that he broke a PMII with variable magnification, which shows to me that even the best of the best with variable magnification are still no match compared to fixed magnification when it comes to ruggedness.
Anyway, I'd be interested in people's experience and knowledge on the matter.
Cheers
I have done a great deal of research and have gone off of mostly what "tiborasaurusrex" on his YouTube channel has recommended. Pretty much all of his stuff in the "Sniper 101" series (that I have seen so far) makes a lot of sense.
So from his recommendations, which are reasonably old now, a fixed scope is 'tougher' than a variable power.
Regarding make and models, I was thinking of:
SWFA SS 10x42
or
going to the other end of the spectrum with a Schmidt and Bender (S&B) PMII 10x42.
US optics do the FDN FX10 10X42MM but they are more expensive than the S&B for me in Australia- are they as good as a S&B?
I noticed in another forum that the Bushnell Elite Tactical LRS 10x42 Rifle Scope is another option but they aren't listed on their website- are they now redundant, and if not, are they any good?
The SWFA's are a pain to get here in Australia because I'd have to send it to a forwarder such as "Hop-Shop-Go" because of their policies...
And then I saw the following statement on another website and was hoping someone here could verify its credibility:
"The old school benefit of fixed power being sturdier is gone with the newer scope designs/materials/manufacturers."
I have had 2 lower end optics break on me in the last 6 months so I want something bulletproof. My requirements for a scope are that it has to have mil or moa markings (for rangefinding) and turrets designed for constant adjusting. The S&B PMII and SWFA SS are military rated. Do you guys know what else fits into these requirements? Tiborasaurusrex claims that he broke a PMII with variable magnification, which shows to me that even the best of the best with variable magnification are still no match compared to fixed magnification when it comes to ruggedness.
Anyway, I'd be interested in people's experience and knowledge on the matter.
Cheers