I just got an MH25 and am gonna give head mounted dual band monos another shot. I have a green omni 7 PVS14 and want either one or two filters that'll get my mh25 color and pvs14 colors lined up. Any suggestions?
Does anyone know if the MH25 can fit inside the TNVC lightweight bridge?
I know...
Nice. I'm gonna pick one long action and one short action with the SRS-XF hardware whenever your customized stock page starts listing the HTN26. Thanks for the replies.
Fully functional. Comes with UNV remote battery kit and Vortex Defender caps. 6000. Located in Columbus GA. Insured shipping available at cost to buyer. Open to offers.
It depends on how heavy your rifle is and if you want to stand... My 3342 is fine for a 15lb bolt gun seated, but wobbly kneeling and standing. It's solid for my 8 lb AR in all positions but wobbles a little standing.
I have an RRS head
Post pics when you get done. A pro with the 2124LR will be that you will be able to read see landmarks/sign if you want to set some up for your range...
Where are you located?
I don't think the mawl has an adjustable flood, which is nice if you're pairing it with a pvs30/27.
I like the mawl in that it's serviceable, has good brightness with the civ units, and has a nice mount. I don't like a lot of other ergonomic things about it, and that (i think) the flood isn't...
that 6.5 with a faster load should be fine for pigs out to 400. Especially with the radius. Honestly, if you're blasting your target with illumination, you won't really need a special high FOM unit. A run of the mill pvs30 or 27 would be fine and those are pretty cheap.
If you can get your...
The UTC is better with a shorter scope so you can reach that focus ring. Your gun sounds bad ass, but if you want something that is the best overall night setup, you're gonna want a different rifle to go with it. The UTC is actually super nice with a 1-8, 2-10. or 3-15. It kinda starts sucking...
If they're as good as spuhrs, american made, and cheaper, I can get behind it but it sounds like they use stanag and spuhrs are still better
EDIT: Maybe i'm retarded. Does spuhr use stanag or their own thing? I can't remember
For me a 2-10 vs a 1-8 is more about ADJUSTABLE PARALLAX then anything else. 2-10 might also have a bigger obj.
If you want to refine your sight picture via a parallax knob then the 2-10 is the only way to go.
If all the hardware is there to communicate with a rf, it's a promising sign that sooner than later we'll have the ability lase, solve, and fire without your focus ever leaving the scope