Search results

Search the forum Search Articles
  1. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 Hi DMack, I brought the MK216 in and my good man at the local store said the rifle is "half cycling", the bolt goes back far enough to eject the spent round but not far enough to fully get behind the next bullet in the magazine. This makes complete sense, and explains why the...
  2. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 Hi DMack, I have no plans on making any modifications to the tool, that’s PWS's job. I too noticed the grease at the head, but thought since they tested it, all’s good. I did clean the rifle, but didn’t go after it as aggressively as you mentioned, certainly something to try...
  3. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 WOW, All great and relative questions! When I first got the rifle from the store, I brought it home, drooled, and then cleaned it with Hoppe’s #9 solvent, and lubricated it. I use the standard stuff for cleaning, same way we did it in the military. When I first took the rifle...
  4. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 The PWS MK216 is accurate, but mine sufferes from cycling issues. I have sent it back to PWS for warranty work, they sent it back with lots of wear marks on the foward assist and ejector ramp (proof they fired it) and it still jams. I run factory Federal and Remington 150 or 155...
  5. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 Thanks DMack, You are right, I was referring to being able to switch between the FSC30 and the PRC muzzel break, not a silencer.. The thought is to use the FSC30 for hunting and the PRC for long range shooting. The on-line reviews for the FSC30 sound like it is the perfect all...
  6. M

    PWS MK214

    Re: PWS MK214 Hi DMack, Thanks for the reviews on the MK214. I am looking at the MK216 because of the threaded barrel. I had been told the rifle cannot be fully stripped down if the suppressor is attached. Is that true? I have also been told there is no difference in accuracy between the two...
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts