Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glad to see some folks have some hands on experience to vouch for these, may be a winner. Anybody able to speak to what one would realistically gain/lose when comparing something like Tier 1 https://tier-one-usa.com/collections/scope-mounts-1/products/11mm-scope-ringsI'd also recommend the BKL rings, I've never had a problem with mine, they're simple and light weight. They mount straight onto the dovetail and mine have never slipped. They have an adjustable base available if you do want to add cant. For your 50mm scope get the low rings.
https://www.bkltech.com/30mm-Scope-Mounts-s/58.htm
Will keep a watch for these, appear to be a good optionLook for old Accuracy International dovetail scope mounts. They are 11mm and come in various cants (0-18-45MOA) and Ring sizes (1', 30mm and 34mm). I use them on several of my 22's (Sako, Anshutz, etc). They are outstanding quality and a great value. You can find them here on the hide for good prices.
Would you like to expand on that? The warne are junk, I have had both.I’d buy a set of warne rings before the BLK
Not familiar with kelbly but looking at the rings they appear to be very well done
Was checking out Morr, impressive resume and appears to have started out concentrating on .22 as wellKelby rings, no experience with them
Morr Accuracy ( usa made high quality, extremely lightweight ). Great rings https://www.morraccuracy.com/store/c2/Rings_&_Levels.html
D3 rings (sold on ebay store, usa made high quality $60). Great rings
maybe Burris signature rings with the composite insert system, my experience has been 50/50 with these. I’d look at the previous options first.
Not familiar with kelbly but looking at the rings they appear to be very well done
5 axis is certainly a machining advantage, in short you can perform multiple operations in one setup, increasing efficiency and accuracyTier One's machining is first class - there's a couple of podcasts around where they talk about their (5-axis??) machines.
Sportsmatch work. From memory, weren't they used on AIs as part of the UK issued rifles?
If you don't need any cant or slope in the scope, BKL's are the best. If you need some cant, then Sportsmatch single adjustables are excellent.
I just don't get the idea of the pic adapter rails. Maybe if one was sharing a scope from a centerfire that has pic mounts. But if you are running a dedicated scope, the pic adapter rails make no sense to me.
I’d buy a set of warne rings before the BLKs
Would you like to expand on that? The warne are junk, I have had both.
Yup. I have had several sets of warne rings for CZ and a couple others for normal pic rails. Haven’t had a single issue with any of them. I had one set of blks for the CZ and they felt much cheaper and the machining/screws didn’t appear to be of the same quality….
His observations may not be objective in your opinion, but you’ve not yet listed a single reason the BKL rings are better. Feel free to share.Oh that's very fucking objective. We shall take your word as law.
GTFO
BTW, you're not the only one in the world who has owned rings from both brands.
It isn't my opinion that his statements are subjective. It's a fact. He lacks any evidence to show why BKL rings are inferior to Warne and in fact admits to basing is claim on appearances and feel.His observations may not be objective in your opinion, but you’ve not yet listed a single reason the BKL rings are better. Feel free to share.
Lmao! Are your panties in a wad? The OP asked for recommendations. That’s what he got. You offered nothing over what I said…. Seems like you’re not a stable person if you’re this upset over an internet opinion about rimfire rings. Have a good evening.It isn't my opinion that his statements are subjective. It's a fact. He lacks any evidence to show why BKL rings are inferior to Warne and in fact admits to basing is claim on appearances and feel.
I also didn't claim BKL rings are the best. I agreed with someone else's claim. So feel free to ask him for proof.
Wanna tone it down a bit? This isn't the Pit.Oh that's very fucking objective. We shall take your word as law.
GTFO
BTW, you're not the only one in the world who has owned rings from both brands.
Which 457 do you have? Just ordered a BSCAR 25 MOA rail and a set of Warne low rings for my provarmint so I can dial to 300 yards. Should be here Tuesday.Haven’t bit the bullet on a new set yet, still looking for a good used set
Have the AT one with varmint barrel, might be a squeeze with the 50mm objectiveWhich 457 do you have? Just ordered a BSCAR 25 MOA rail and a set of Warne low rings for my provarmint so I can dial to 300 yards. Should be here Tuesday.
I’ve got a pair of Warne 22 cal mediums that are 5 weeks old. They would probably fit if you had a 457 with a smaller contour barrel than the Pro-varmint
Hope you find what you’re looking for before the shooting season is over.Haven’t bit the bullet on a new set yet, still looking for a good used set
Pretty neat, first time I’ve seen these. I’m liking the option of having some elevation built in on whatever I end up withHere is a very elegant and inexpensive solution for your problem. They are designed to be used with Burris Z Rings or Signature Z rings. I used these on a 54 Super match with the Signature rings which allowed me to build cant into the system.
https://www.jnpgunsprings.com/CZ-11mm-to-WEAVER-SCOPE-RAIL-ADAPTERS-p72157596
Thanks, the heat doesn’t bother me much and doesn’t get awfully cold here so no real time crunch. Rifle is scoped with a cheaper 1” tube currently, just going to swap with the new scope when I work out the ringsHope you find what you’re looking for before the shooting season is over.
Good to know on the BKLs, ThanksView attachment 7857824
OP,
I would consider the offerings from Area 419. Though not intended for this rifle, their CZ 457 rail in 50MOA is a quality unit.
I believe they offer 20 and 30MOA as well.
I have owned Warne steel and BKL alloy rings. The Warnes while nice had a machining flaw. When sent back, they returned a simpler (downgraded) set. The replacements were perfect, and I’ve never had to touch the scope adjustments in over 10 years, still, it bugs me.
The BKLs were a disappointment. They are a simple extrusion that had been bead/sand/shot blasted. No where near the quality of anything else I’ve used.
I have purchased a set of BKL adapters (11mm to Picatinny) which seem to have more bearing surface, and would be less likely to slip compared to the CZ adapters.