Hi guys
A friend of mine surprised me at the range a few days ago, as he knew I was going to test/compare some loads at 500 meters. I was not expecting him being there with a couple of cameras but I guess it turned out all right. He did a great job filming and editing and I thought some of you may want to take a look.
It was a new experience for me, shooting under the eye of a camera (still, it is easier than when someone is shooting back at you) but once you get behind the scope, it does not matter anymore; you just hope you are not going to miss too many shots
He shot it as it went, only few little mistakes such as one "hit" before I send the round, or the "24 FPS" bullets; it is really 2400 but I am sure you already got that. I already knew the Varget loads were good but never tried the 4350 loads, I just went with the Sierra Manual, reading the specs on 7.62x54r, as well as specs for the 174gr BTHP and the 175gr BTHP.
I sent a couple of rounds at 500, before the camera started rolling, as I only had written dope for 300. I also shot 3 rounds at 100, 10 minutes before, to make sure the 4350 loads were similar in accuracy to the Varget loads, got lucky, they were.
It was not the best day for accurate shooting, as the wind was at 10/12 MPH and changing but the purpose of this range session was to compare the 44.6 Varget loads to the 52.5 of Accurate 4350.
During this session, I was shooting the two loads alternatively.
Here is the link
https://vimeo.com/68784589
No matter what, it was another good day at the range.
Ombre noire
A friend of mine surprised me at the range a few days ago, as he knew I was going to test/compare some loads at 500 meters. I was not expecting him being there with a couple of cameras but I guess it turned out all right. He did a great job filming and editing and I thought some of you may want to take a look.
It was a new experience for me, shooting under the eye of a camera (still, it is easier than when someone is shooting back at you) but once you get behind the scope, it does not matter anymore; you just hope you are not going to miss too many shots
He shot it as it went, only few little mistakes such as one "hit" before I send the round, or the "24 FPS" bullets; it is really 2400 but I am sure you already got that. I already knew the Varget loads were good but never tried the 4350 loads, I just went with the Sierra Manual, reading the specs on 7.62x54r, as well as specs for the 174gr BTHP and the 175gr BTHP.
I sent a couple of rounds at 500, before the camera started rolling, as I only had written dope for 300. I also shot 3 rounds at 100, 10 minutes before, to make sure the 4350 loads were similar in accuracy to the Varget loads, got lucky, they were.
It was not the best day for accurate shooting, as the wind was at 10/12 MPH and changing but the purpose of this range session was to compare the 44.6 Varget loads to the 52.5 of Accurate 4350.
During this session, I was shooting the two loads alternatively.
Here is the link
https://vimeo.com/68784589
No matter what, it was another good day at the range.
Ombre noire
Last edited: