Re: .308 - where do you like to zero at and why?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Graham</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: ecg</div><div class="ubbcode-body">100m. Only because it's the longest covered position at my range. </div></div><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Sin City Shooter</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Another one for 200 yards. </div></div>I don't get it:
If you're zeroed at 100m you are also zeroed at 100 yards.
And if you are zeroed at 200 yards you are also zeroed at 100 yards.
Why do people think that a zero is a limitation?</div></div>
I get what you are saying Graham, I also zero at 100, but there is also validity in zeroing at a longer range and being able to score hits, such as in a hunting situation, all the way out to nearly 300 in most of the deer capable cartridges out there, using no holdovers. Basically they are advocating zeroing for point blank shooting. I think that approach is best if you didnt have a tactical reticle or target turrets.
For simplicity sake, for range, tactical, or competition use, most should probably zero at 100 and memorize their holdovers if they have the reticle to do so.