Anyone use the arca rail weights? 3.5 oz per weight. Doesn’t seem like too much weight. You could potentially add just over 1 lb if you get all 5 weights to fill the rail.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below!
Join the contestYea I have a Bergara in the HMR stock and while it’s 22, it has some recoil to it. Which I feel affect accuracy a bit. By buddies gun in chassis is a tank and doesn’t even flinch when fired. Actually makes a huge difference. Chassis would be the best choice but was seeing if the weights would actually make much of a difference.For the Manners PRS-TCS I used all 7. It's not that much weight if you look at chassis like ACC and Envy where the fore-end weights add an additional 1.5lbs.
Yea I have a Bergara in the HMR stock and while it’s 22, it has some recoil to it. Which I feel affect accuracy a bit. By buddies gun in chassis is a tank and doesn’t even flinch when fired. Actually makes a huge difference. Chassis would be the best choice but was seeing if the weights would actually make much of a difference.
The gun will slightly move toward the rear so I can see the scope reticles jump a bit. So my follow thru isn’t really rock solid on the sight. I also don’t jam the stock into my shoulder to reduce any induced body part affecting the gun. And my left hand is manipulating the bag. I’m looking to add some weight and possibly bipod feet. Shooting prone on my mat layer over gravel may have affected it a bit. Since it wasn’t the most solid ground. But my buddy was shooting in the same conditions. Look I know it’s 22. But it still has a bit of recoil I’m trying to control without using to much of my bodyRecoil affecting accuracy? Are you talking about follow up shots? Or that recoil literally affects the accuracy of a single shot?
The gun will slightly move toward the rear so I can see the scope reticles jump a bit. So my follow thru isn’t really rock solid on the sight. I also don’t jam the stock into my shoulder to reduce any induced body part affecting the gun. And my left hand is manipulating the bag. I’m looking to add some weight and possibly bipod feet. Shooting prone on my mat layer over gravel may have affected it a bit. Since it wasn’t the most solid ground. But my buddy was shooting in the same conditions. Look I know it’s 22. But it still has a bit of recoil I’m trying to control without using to much of my body
Good advice. Someone else mentioned loading the bipod legs to get rid of the slight play. I moved my scope to allow for less shoulder contact. But I may need to increase shoulder contact a bit more. I can add the stock spacers to help with that. Otherwise my eye relief will be off.Convert PX member to Community Supporter and get access to the training vids. They helped me quite a bit. Biggest thing was pulling rifle into shoulder, then slightly loading bipod with the hips, that's all the load you need. And keeping the support hand solidly on the bag/rear of the stock and not letting the support hand go limp. That let my recoil go perfectly straight back. I took a class with lowlight using a .308 and that allowed straight recoil and tiny groups. Same concept applies to .22 even though people think there's very little recoil.
Move the scope before adding LOPGood advice. Someone else mentioned loading the bipod legs to get rid of the slight play. I moved my scope to allow for less shoulder contact. But I may need to increase shoulder contact a bit more. I can add the stock spacers to help with that. Otherwise my eye relief will be off.
Don’t want to sight in again. I actually like where the scope sits on the rifle now. Gun seems more balanced.Move the scope before adding LOP
They need to make the weights out of Tungsten. It’s heavy.
shame they dont make the normal weighted rail from steelYou can order the PRS-TCS also with a steel arca rail instead of aluminum which will add a bit more weight.