4831 vs. 4831 SC

[19Scout77]

I know they are listed as having the same burn rate, but has anyone ACTUALLY substituted 4831 for 4831SC in a developed load and tracked any change in performance?

TIA

 

[Buckoman]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

yes, I have. Its identical.

 

[19Scout77]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Master_Blaster</div><div class="ubbcode-body">yes, I have. Its identical. </div></div>

Thanks. Anybody else?

 

[Victor N TN]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

I have some ordered. But it hasn't come in yet.

 

[ChadTRG42]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Master_Blaster</div><div class="ubbcode-body">yes, I have. Its identical. </div></div>
Identical. I will show no difference between the two, other than the non SC powder fills the case more.

 

[Mag 300]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

Same powder the SC is for short vut they track the same

 

[Jerry R]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

I have substituted one for the other in an established load and had absolutely <span style="font-weight: bold">no</span> difference in POI or velocity, 100% interchangable.

 

[Jerry m]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Jerry R</div><div class="ubbcode-body">I have substituted one for the other in an established load and had absolutely <span style="font-weight: bold">no</span> difference in POI or velocity, 100% interchangable. </div></div>

Same here although SC does meter much better.

Good luck

Jerry

 

[19Scout77]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

Thanks for the info gents!

 

[Mag 300]

Re: 4831 vs. 4831 SC

Great powder but the SC seems to load better