Can someone who owns comparably equipped versions of each tell me their feelings on the subject?
I had a TRG 42 in 338 LM and I sold it (
) because of the general consensus that it was a waste of powder inside 1K. I use my GAP 308 for everything now, because my range maxes out just shy of 700 yards.
But, the majority of my shooting at the time was 300 and in. I am now spending more time at the deep end of <span style="font-style: italic">my</span> pool. Just wondering if there is any possible excuse for me to justify the 338LM when shooting 600-700 yards. And all the ancillary costs associated with the thumper. New dies, and all the components and the LM's huge appetite for powder.
Can a decent shooter expect substantially improved accuracy from a 338LM over a 308 win? Assuming comparable equipment. The last factor, is that I will occasionally have the opportunity to shoot well past 1K on private property and would love to own another TRG 42 any damn way.
I had a TRG 42 in 338 LM and I sold it (
But, the majority of my shooting at the time was 300 and in. I am now spending more time at the deep end of <span style="font-style: italic">my</span> pool. Just wondering if there is any possible excuse for me to justify the 338LM when shooting 600-700 yards. And all the ancillary costs associated with the thumper. New dies, and all the components and the LM's huge appetite for powder.
Can a decent shooter expect substantially improved accuracy from a 338LM over a 308 win? Assuming comparable equipment. The last factor, is that I will occasionally have the opportunity to shoot well past 1K on private property and would love to own another TRG 42 any damn way.