Annie 1416 HB vs. 64 MPR

[JoshD]

I have decided that I want to step up to an Annie when I sell my FVSR. The Savage shoots well but not well enough and I don't want to spend anymore time and money on bedding and such.

I had planned on getting a 64 MPR instead of the 1416 for the simple reason that I wanted a 2 stage trigger. However, a friend just sent me a text and told me about a local place that has 1416's on sale, and on their website it says they are a special run with 2 stage triggers. The difference in price is fairly substantial. I looked up the specs and the 1416 HB's barrel is slightly shorter and slightly thinner than the 64 MPR.

Does anyone have experience with both rifles? I know the 64 MPR's generally shoot very well. Basically I just want a consistent MOA or less rifle. Also, is the barrel easily removable on either of these rifles? I would like to get it threaded.

 

[Redmanss]

The biggest advantage with the MPR will be the higher comb on the stock for scoped shooting, particularly if you're going to run larger objectives or utilize a canted base. I have a 1517 and a 1710, both with a 1416 style stock and DIP bases/SWFA SS 3-15x44 scopes, and getting in a good position does require modifications or a stock pack. If you are fine doing that, then I say take the deal with the 2-stage 1416.

 

[JoshD]

Thanks for the info. I didn't plan on running a canted base but then again I'm not sure how much elevation I will have on the scope. I'm thinking hard about getting the SWFA SS 10x fixed model. The price is fairly reasonable and I already have the SS 3-9x42 on my SAM-R'ish rifle. As long as I can get to 300yd with the elevation maxed out + holdover on the reticle, I'll be happy.