Any final word. On what happen to JAE

Probably due to $2000 chassis just don’t dell enough when you can get into others for 1/2 the cost.
you've clearly never spent time with one to understand why they cost $2k

spec out a full weight kit ACC with folding stock
cadex chassis
decked out whiskey 3 folder

hell even a decked out manners
 
Nobody gives a shit why they cost $2000.

The market said they ain't worth it, and the market don't give a fuck about fanboys
until they tell us what happened, no one knows whether it was a price issue.

like every other thread you just come to shit from behind your keyboard. nothing new out of you. and nothing useful either. but life goes on with you wasting internet
 
  • Like
Reactions: M8541Reaper
It likely wasn’t necessarily the actual price that was the issue.

They sold an expensive (comparatively) chassis for 16 years and didn’t come up with any new ideas.

Precision rifle is a very niche market. We like to feel like we’re hot shit, but we ain’t in the grand scheme of things.

When you sell basically the exact same product in a niche market for 16 years, and one that doesn’t fail or break, a couple things happen:

Most everyone who wants one has one.

You have to literally compete against your own used product. They don’t break, so you have 16 years worth of used stocks to compete with. Why buy a new one for $1800, when you can get an excellent shape used one for $1200.

When they finally did come out with a new product, it was the same chassis......for a tikka. Are you fucking kidding me?? You spend the time and money for tooling expecting people to buy an $800 rifle and drop it in an $1800 chassis? Gtfo

They didn’t diversify and didn’t adapt.

And I’m an jae fanboy. I’ve owned close to 10 and love them. B

I can assure you, they didn’t close the doors because the rats were eating all the cash they had piled up from profit.
 
It likely wasn’t necessarily the actual price that was the issue.

They sold an expensive (comparatively) chassis for 16 years and didn’t come up with any new ideas.

Precision rifle is a very niche market. We like to feel like we’re hot shit, but we ain’t in the grand scheme of things.

When you sell basically the exact same product in a niche market for 16 years, and one that doesn’t fail or break, a couple things happen:

Most everyone who wants one has one.

You have to literally compete against your own used product. They don’t break, so you have 16 years worth of used stocks to compete with. Why buy a new one for $1800, when you can get an excellent shape used one for $1200.

When they finally did come out with a new product, it was the same chassis......for a tikka. Are you fucking kidding me?? You spend the time and money for tooling expecting people to buy an $800 rifle and drop it in an $1800 chassis? Gtfo

They didn’t diversify and didn’t adapt.
What strikes me as most confusing is the moneys
Spent on gumball and the $1200 chassis option.

Unless that was a last ditch effort to get a bunch if sales real fast
 
Any final word?

8A9ADDEA-090A-4160-AD50-F7E847719D29.jpeg
 
until they tell us what happened, no one knows whether it was a price issue.

like every other thread you just come to shit from behind your keyboard. nothing new out of you. and nothing useful either. but life goes on with you wasting internet
You and the price again.

I don't think you know fuck all about running a business, to be honest.

What was their lead time, btw? Wasn't it long as fuck? Sloooooooow inventory turns while cash keeps going out on fixed and variable expenses every month.

Hint: product excellence isn't enough to succeed.
 
you've clearly never spent time with one to understand why they cost $2k

spec out a full weight kit ACC with folding stock
cadex chassis
decked out whiskey 3 folder

hell even a decked out manners
Actually I have. They were very nice but and I often said if I ever went BACK to a chassis it would have been a JAllen.

Then I found foundation and never looked back.

Also have fully kitted manners and they were well south of $2k.
 
I am guessing 5 employees and a shop full of machines would easily be 50k in over head a month. That is before they even turned a screw or bought materials. You would need to sell roughly 80 to 100k per month in stocks to make a profit. Could they sell and produce that many stocks per month? I wouldn't think so. I think that they bit themselves by taking deposits and creating a false cash flow. They were in a pickle of having a huge backlog of people that ordered direct that were waiting literally years for stocks while in the mean time supplying distributors and not delivering on orders that people put deposits on. I think that when they started producing the JAE700 it was a gerbil wheel from that point on and even a small slow down in orders would gave been devastating.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 308pirate
I don't think the full details will ever be public and I am okay with that, it's there business.

But I hope everyone that had an outstanding order got a full refund.....
 
I am guessing 5 employees and a shop full of machines would easily be 50k in over head a month. That is before they even turned a screw or bought materials. You would need to sell roughly 80 to 100k per month in stocks to make a profit. Could they sell and produce that many stocks per month? I wouldn't think so. I think that they bit themselves by taking deposits and creating a false cash flow. They were in a pickle of having a huge backlog of people that ordered direct that were waiting literally years for stocks while in the mean time supplying distributors and not delivering on orders that people put deposits on. I think that when they started producing the JAE700 it was a gerbil wheel from that point on and even a small slow down in orders would gave been devastating.

I agree with your analysis other than the common confusion between being profitable and being cash flow negative.

You can be profitable [ (price-cost of goods sold)/price ] and still lose your ass because each month's expenses > receivables (which is what you're describing)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jknox1030
I agree with your analysis other than the common confusion between being profitable and being cash flow negative.

You can be profitable [ (price-cost of goods sold)/price ] and still lose your ass because each month's expenses > receivables (which is what you're describing)
I think it was two fold, gross profit may have been good but lack of volume could not cover expenses. Also, being blinded by the cash flow of deposits may have contributed to the mentality of operating the business as if you were profitable.

This is one reason why I am skeptical of "pre-orders". I think that they can be a cash flow scam.
 
Agreed. Pre-order is just another term for crowd funding. Then the initial run of product goes straight to distribution instead of the customers who "pre-ordered."
 
On what grounds would a C&D order be issued? They've been in business for what, 16 years without issue. What could have popped up so suddenly to warrant that, I wonder?
 
Gotcha. I guess I've always view C&Ds in the light of patent infringement, etc., making a product that's too close to another or some such. I'd never considered the financial aspect of things getting involved in such a way, thinking the creditor/bank/whatever would just repo whatever equipment had been defaulted on.