Looking to speak to an industry rep that would be interested in seeing another state become a market for their products.
I have joined a "pro se" court case in Massachusetts pushing back on some recent expansion of gun "laws".
One of our goals is to open Massachusetts to the use of suppressors.
My friend leading the case is going to seek help from Sig Sauer as expert witness to explain to the court suppressors, their function, their benefit, and how they are misunderstood.
We obviously seem like huge underdogs but we are taking advantage of a recent MA SJC ruling that determined the 70 year old law banning switchblades was unconstitutional as switch blades are arms under the second amendment.
Ours will be the first case to use this wedge.
Two other cases, using real lawyers, were dropped by the plaintiffs after having taken huge amounts of money from donors and expending the effort of a 100,000 signature initiative.
I don't think Sig Sauer will be willing to help us. I hope I am wrong in thinking that but their contracts, to include pistols to the MA State Police, has me thinking they will be on the side of the defendants - the Commonwealth - or at minimum - neutral.
Our current governor ran Smith and Wesson out of the state when she was AG, I have no doubt she would trash Sig Sauers contracts and go to Hi Point if Sig acted up.
We are give send go funded and just regular peeps.
Thoughts.
I have joined a "pro se" court case in Massachusetts pushing back on some recent expansion of gun "laws".
One of our goals is to open Massachusetts to the use of suppressors.
My friend leading the case is going to seek help from Sig Sauer as expert witness to explain to the court suppressors, their function, their benefit, and how they are misunderstood.
We obviously seem like huge underdogs but we are taking advantage of a recent MA SJC ruling that determined the 70 year old law banning switchblades was unconstitutional as switch blades are arms under the second amendment.
Ours will be the first case to use this wedge.
Two other cases, using real lawyers, were dropped by the plaintiffs after having taken huge amounts of money from donors and expending the effort of a 100,000 signature initiative.
I don't think Sig Sauer will be willing to help us. I hope I am wrong in thinking that but their contracts, to include pistols to the MA State Police, has me thinking they will be on the side of the defendants - the Commonwealth - or at minimum - neutral.
Our current governor ran Smith and Wesson out of the state when she was AG, I have no doubt she would trash Sig Sauers contracts and go to Hi Point if Sig acted up.
We are give send go funded and just regular peeps.
Thoughts.
Restore Our Right To Bear Arms In MA Lawsuit
An ambitious lawsuit to restore the people's right to bear arms in Massachusetts!This lawsuit is unlike most others throughout the country seeking to restore...
www.givesendgo.com
Last edited: