Any one running these rifles/uppers? What are your thoughts on them? How do they shoot? Would you buy again at their current prices?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Man I was kind of hoping for more. My other rifles are soft shooters and meet the 1.5 to 2.0 moa with red dots. I have the UGI upper and it’s front heavy because of the govt profile bbl that was required. Also, it’s a DD bbl. I guess instead I should just put my Steiner 1-4 on what I all ready have. I guess I just am not seeing what’s being offered by Geissele and I know others have remove the 42 spring set up and replaced it with the A5.
Not quite.my opinion is that Geissele is overrated and overpriced across their product lines.
KAC is never a mistake in the high end AR world.
Not quite.
They make the best triggers and rail systems hands down. They are comparable in price to any other premium product line. Alot of their development has been with input from socom over the last 15+ years. Bill made the first ever match duty trigger that could stand up to mil cycle. Guys were swaping out mk11 and mk12s to the high speed as fast as they could get them.
Some of their shit is gimmicky and overpriced but same can be said with any company.
Best rails?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you never read anything about the MK16 being a total piece of SH%!?
You are comparing apples and hand-grenades and it was from JSOC that used them. A VERY small group of units using this stuff, so the amounts made are incredibly small. Mass producing that kind of quality is a completely different thing. They made triggers and rails for the 416...... If you have not seen them, the 416 rails is completely different then the AR rail. They tried to adapt the 416 rail to work with the AR platform instead of using a dedicated design.
For people not using a Laser, Clip-On NVD, or iron sights then those rails do exactly what people want.......
Does any one with "insider" or experiential info know what the 16" SD complete rifles were designed to shoot the best with. I'm happy with mine but it doesn't really shoot any better than my home build with 77 FGMM.
Can't say it's smoother shooting or flatter shooting either.
I honestly bought this to have a legit premium rifle that I could have to take classes and things like that I could use if one of my home builds has a malfunction so everyone wouldn't give me shit about my home build, then I can just whip my SD out and keep rocking on lol.
Mine runs well, it runs well with crappy ammo that my home build won’t cycle. They have different gasblocks and barrels though so it’s all gas.
Best rails?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you never read anything about the MK16 being a total piece of SH%!?
A 10 MOA Shift is not bad..........![]()
While “best” rail the MK16 isn’t; your and the internet’s interpretations of “shift” are not correct.
Optics with very few exceptions do not hold zero when dropped from any hight at all. Lasers do not hold zero consistently- any of them when dropped form more than 2’ish feet. “Rail gate” was a farce precisely because people thought that their Leupold/Vortex/Acoq optics and Peq15 or any other laser would hold zero when dropped- they don’t. Not at all. Not to mention, that nearly every other modern rail made has the same issues as the MK16.
You can’t have it all. You want a lightweight, super thin rail- then it’s going to be less durable than a thick, over built full pic rail. That’s just reality. But, the question is, is the rail stable and durable enough for your purpose? The MK16 is a good rail, and other than a MK1 Geissele or Hodge Wedge Lock, it is as good as any other top end thin MLOK handguard.
Do you know That this "SHIFT" is not referring to to the optics? It is referring to the rail SHIFT off its axis.
I have been dealing with Geissele products for a very long time and I have not been impressed. They are a nitch product that filled a requirement for JSOC to modify the 416. That does not transfer over to the AR platform.
I don't want it all. I want my rail to work as if should. That is why I have used and will continue to use a Pic rail in order to get the rigidity and durability that I need. I have never been a fan of the MLOK or KEYMOD system as it is just asking for all of the extra items to fail, loose function with the weight loss, and no longer have a completely secure mounting system for Rial items.
If people are not attaching lasers or any other optical items to their rail then i make perfect sense to use a ultra light rail...... or even think if a rail is needed.
While “best” rail the MK16 isn’t; your and the internet’s interpretations of “shift” are not correct.
Optics with very few exceptions do not hold zero when dropped from any hight at all. Lasers do not hold zero consistently- any of them when dropped form more than 2’ish feet. “Rail gate” was a farce precisely because people thought that their Leupold/Vortex/Acoq optics and Peq15 or any other laser would hold zero when dropped- they don’t. Not at all. Not to mention, that nearly every other modern rail made has the same issues as the MK16.
You can’t have it all. You want a lightweight, super thin rail- then it’s going to be less durable than a thick, over built full pic rail. That’s just reality. But, the question is, is the rail stable and durable enough for your purpose? The MK16 is a good rail, and other than a MK1 Geissele or Hodge Wedge Lock, it is as good as any other top end thin MLOK handguard.
Best rails?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So you never read anything about the MK16 being a total piece of SH%!?
You are comparing apples and hand-grenades and it was from JSOC that used them. A VERY small group of units using this stuff, so the amounts made are incredibly small. Mass producing that kind of quality is a completely different thing. They made triggers and rails for the 416...... If you have not seen them, the 416 rails is completely different then the AR rail. They tried to adapt the 416 rail to work with the AR platform instead of using a dedicated design.
For people not using a Laser, Clip-On NVD, or iron sights then those rails do exactly what people want.......
How is it being determined that the rail is shifted off axis?
It was measured based off the top of the Upper receiver.
I don’t doubt that you have. So have I.
What Picatinny rail are you using that uses a conventaional barrel nut system, that does not shift from a 1.5m drop (the Army slide)? I am not sure I understand your question.
What rail items have you had fail, lose function, or otherwise not work with quality MLOK? Besides the Geissele I have seen a BCM flex with normal grip during a night shoot that put the POI off by 2 feet at 50 Yards. I have had several MLOK mounts come off the rail, even with Locktite.
I get that, so what rail, optic and laser are you using that does not shift from impacts (drops)? I have been using a LaRue Tactical rail for the last 15 plus years. I have not had a significant shift from falls. Even a 50ish foot fall off the ramp of a helicopter that dislocated my shoulder. My PEQ was still good.
Listen Asshole why the fuck do you keep bringing up JSOC? As far as small group of users.
Over 10,500 rails and parts went to USASOC for the URGI M4A1 upgrade. over 4200 for MK18 upgrade and not to mention thousands of other unit orders being fulfilled not including the over 5K for the M110A1 upgrade.
If you are gonna slander a company then get your fucking facts straight instead of making shit up like you have an agenda.
So, I read all the posts on this rifle and still went ahead and bought an unused SD in the box for $750.00
Seems to be a pretty nice rifle for basic defense use.
The original owner included a BCM grip and magazine and changed out the stock to a Magpul. I never liked the OpMod so the Magpul is fine for my use.
Haven’t decided if I’ll keep it or sell it.
View attachment 7398764View attachment 7398765View attachment 7398766