I realize that there are better powders out there, but a neighbor gave me a couple pounds and am trying to decide what to do with it. Doesn't appear to be fertilizer fodder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To enter, all you need to do is add an image of yourself at the range below! Subscribers get more entries, check out the plans below for a better chance of winning!
Join the contest Subscribe918v you are correct, i will add the load development was in military brass, then it was changed to commercial brass, and a few more grains of IMR-3031 were addedI read that FGMM used 39grs of 3031 under the 168smk back in the ‘80s
IMR 3031, .308, and 130gr bullets are a match made in Heaven. At least they were in my Remington 788 years ago.I realize that there are better powders out there, but a neighbor gave me a couple pounds and am trying to decide what to do with it. Doesn't appear to be fertilizer fodder.
However, it meters almost as well as Lincoln Logs…..
Having loaded .223’s with 3031, comparing it to Lincoln Logs is a bit of an understatement. Redwood logs maybe but tiny little half inch wind Lincoln Logs,,,,Nah!That's funny shit right there!
Bro don’t know the woes till hath load N570!Having loaded .223’s with 3031, comparing it to Lincoln Logs is a bit of an understatement. Redwood logs maybe but tiny little half inch wind Lincoln Logs,,,,Nah!
I've heard cordite described as such. What gets me is the IMR 3031 was supposed to be the powder for the 303 Brit 174 ball loads. "303-1" but modern IMR 3031 is too fast of a powder for that use. Must have had a chemical change done to it since back in the day.You ever pull down old 303 British cases? What's it called cordite or something like that 2 inch long sticks.