-
Having trouble using the site?
Contact support
AR-10 vs a FN-Fal
- Thread starter Iron Worker
- Start date
Lol. Lmao even.
No dude, the most accurate 762 is the M1A.
No dude, the most accurate 762 is the M1A.
Neither, however an AR would be "easier" to improve a bit yourself without having to send it out. Up to a point.
I like M14s but that's a real stretch.
I've never seen, heard of, nor read of a precision FAL.
The USAMU set the long range interservice rifle team 1000-yard record at Quantico in 2012 using AR-10s, besting all previous M1, M14, and M16 scores.
Yes with the M14 next in line & the FAL last, as far as precision.
I was obviously kidding.I like M14s but that's a real stretch.
I've never seen, heard of, nor read of a precision FAL.
The USAMU set the long range interservice rifle team 1000-yard record at Quantico in 2012 using AR-10s, besting all previous M1, M14, and M16 scores.
FAL, G3, M1A … none of these really qualify as “precision” platforms … even if you dump a lot of coin in them
Plenty of modern gassers out there to scratch that itch
Yes... by about 5 fold.
I wouldn't go that far, dollar for dollar. IIRC FN-FAL's are 3 to 4 MOA rifles on average, probably quite similarly are G3 types (PTR91).
Say just as an example $1,500 today. For what could be bought of each platform (FN-FAL/G3 type/AR10) at the $1,500 price. More likely 2 ish fold better towards the AR.
However that's where the AR can be improved, and the others just can't.
Getting up into more expensive AR10 types? Absolutely towards 3plus fold betterment out of the box likely.
However its all kind of like comparing apples with oranges.
-IMO.
lol at some of the responses
AR10 all day, this isn't even a question
AR10 all day, this isn't even a question
Five fold is probably conservative. The FAL is probably a five MOA rifle on its very best day. Tilting bolts are not conducive to accuracy.
You've been on this website since 2005 and yet still ask questions like this? 
The better AR-10 variants crush the FAL family in the accuracy department. But my StG58 clone with Hensoldt 4X and a trigger job will shoot around 1.5 MOA with RUAG ammo.
The FAL is definitely sexier.
The FAL is definitely sexier.
The only thing I like on the FAL over the AR-10 is that adjustable gas system and the charge handle interface for ergonomics, but the AR design keeps debris out of the working parts much better.
Taking the question at face value the answer is yes. An AR-10 is superior to literally every other semi-auto rifle in a similar caliber.
Is an AR-10 the best rifle for precision shooting? The answer to that is no.
FALs look fucking cool, like the same people who built 1800s steam locomotives decided to make guns instead.
Do you even Rhodesia bruh?
…seriously though, yeah the FAL is the clear winner for actual proven use in ‘wartime’ situations, and hands down the FAL > AR10 for cool points/style, but I’ll bet even my lightweight AR10 with a cheap-ass Faxon 16” pencil barrel that’s 1.5 MOA on a good day, with good ammo, is more accurate.
…seriously though, yeah the FAL is the clear winner for actual proven use in ‘wartime’ situations, and hands down the FAL > AR10 for cool points/style, but I’ll bet even my lightweight AR10 with a cheap-ass Faxon 16” pencil barrel that’s 1.5 MOA on a good day, with good ammo, is more accurate.
They can keep the shorts can't imagine wearing those things into combat.
I wonder what Africa would look like if the West hadn't abandoned those two countries down there. Probably a lot more industrious and organized.
Those Rhodesian boys were tough mudders, some will remember the pre internet era with Soldier of Fortune and Shotgun news where these pics were common place and the stories were "interesting" to say the least............
I remember those things at gun shows when I was a kid. From what I understand before Rhodesia collapsed they were recruiting anybody to go fight the commies.
