This question is geared towards the guys that have either owned or currently own both. If you could choose, would you prefer a Gen1 or the current Gen2 model and why?
Thanks for your help
Thanks for your help
We've got some exciting changes coming, check the thread below for more info!
VIEW THREADGen2 because if it weren’t somehow an improvement it would exist? That and they don’t make the gen1 anymore should make a purchasing decision easy...
I cant tell a difference in the 1 or 2. My 1 is fantastically smooth, not sure how others say any different. Any triggers issues are on the trigger mfg (I had to send my geissele back to them for an update), and I like the idea of the cross lug bolt stop - nothing will ever break there.from what little I underwthe gen2 rollout was geared more towards manufacturing streamlining between the designs of the archimedes and nucleus so I wasnt sure the real world improvements on the end user side of things .. I know they changed the bolt stop .. other than that im not sure
Yeah,,,,my early Nuke is super smooth and works great with a Huber trigger.I cant tell a difference in the 1 or 2. My 1 is fantastically smooth, not sure how others say any different. Any triggers issues are on the trigger mfg (I had to send my geissele back to them for an update), and I like the idea of the cross lug bolt stop - nothing will ever break there.
Were the FP spring issues with specific primers, or seemingly random? What about the CRF problems some were having? Reading through the big ARC/xylo/action thread and others it's really hard to get a sense of how common the lemons were compared to how vocal a small handful of customers were. I'm near pulling the trigger on one of the Nuke/Xylo builds but don't want to fully discount the opinion of folks who have had a bad experience. Really hoping to get a platform that'll remain relevant and lend itself to updating for a good long while.