Is the reticle on a Conus BTR as thin as the Midas TAC? Long story short, I finally got the wife out to the range over Christmas and she did really good. My rifles didn't fit her very well so I decided to try to put together a cheap, used rifle for her. If she likes shooting I'll get her something better later. For glass I bought an Athlon Midas TAC off the exchange and I have found that I really like the floating dot APLR reticle. The reticle is noticeably thinner than the one in my PST II and I really like the way you can bracket round steel with the 1 MOA gap in either side of the dot. Since I only shoot paper and steel and don't hunt anymore I want to convert my 223 bolt gun over to a range toy. I need to replace the plain crosshair reticle Zeiss HD5 with something with subtensions and I'm thinking about going with a Cronus BTR. I like how thin the lines are on the Midas, but its a non-illuminated scope, will the Cronus being an illuminated scope have the same thin lines or will the illumination require they be thicker? The literature on the Atlon site doesn't say how thin the lines are and none of the local shops that carry Athlon have a Conus in stock.