B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

#2
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

I have handled both. There is a reason I have three of the B&C's and no Choate stocks.

Handle them yourself and see.

Here is what is in the B&C:

IMG_3493.jpg


IMG_3505.jpg


IMG_3508.jpg
 
#3
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

I went with a B&C for my current build (300 blackout, Howa action). For my budget, the mid-ranged B&C had what I wanted: lightweight, bedding rail, color. It is also well designed ergonomically, but I am one of the fortunate ones who doesn't require large amounts of adjustment

I had a bad experience with a Choate in the past and while yes, it is subjective, it still effects my recommendations and purchase decisions.

A lot of it is also going to depend on your budget, what's your top end? Are you looking for any specific features? Do you mind the time/cost of bedding or do you want a rail system?

If you ultimately choose a B&C, check out Shooters Discount. They are quick and efficient, and have very competitive prices.
 
#8
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tbag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">L.W. have you ever cut a HS stock that is supposed to have the full length chassis system? </div></div>

Nope. Unfortunately I don't have that kind of coin. The cutaway pictured above is property of B&C. I just took the pics.

I can tell you from seeing the studs ripped out that if the H&S actually has aluminum in the forend, the studs are not screwed into it.
 
#9
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: LoneWolfUSMC</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Tbag</div><div class="ubbcode-body">L.W. have you ever cut a HS stock that is supposed to have the full length chassis system? </div></div>

I can tell you from seeing the studs ripped out that if the H&S actually has aluminum in the forend, the studs are not screwed into it. </div></div>

+1. I saw that as well. Those studs were not screwed into any sort of aluminum forend.
 
#10
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

The B&C Medalist is plenty strong as well as lightweight. I have two of them.

I have not tried the newer Choate, but I was not fond of the old one. Too much flex just aft of where the aluminum stopped.
That stock flexed alot in the grip area.
 
#13
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: KC117</div><div class="ubbcode-body">

Plus it has more features then a B & C.

</div></div>

Guess I missed the 6 disk changer and the power windows.
grin.gif


I have had several of the MCM look alike B&C stocks. By far the best stock in its price range. The front stud is definitely tapped into the aluminum frame, the rear is not, as you can see by the cut out LW posted. They are stiff as hell, with extremely little flex, and very light weight, as previously stated. I did not have to bed any of mine, and they all were very comfortable, as much as any A5 I have used.

I give it two thumbs up.

9113c878-874f-44da-a6f4-bea4e227cde9.jpg
 
#14
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

I put the Choate on my 700, best $200 I ever spent. Dropped right in, I torqued it down and that was it. It's a pound or two heavier than the Rem stock (PSS 700). Cold bore shot is always in the same place, no zero shifts or other problems. They now offer it with an adjustable cheekpiece.
No it's not a macmillan or manners, but my budget wont allow that option.
 
#15
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

+1 on the B&C. I have one on a heavy .204 savage SS (M12). I don't have any experience with the choate tactical that resembles the MCM A5 in looks, but I've done the older stocks (ultimate varmint, I think they called it). No thanks. My savage has a custom barrel (LW), but w/o any bedding, and a slight amount of relieving under the tang, it shoots 40 Amax averaging in the .2s. If you want it heavier, the recoil pad can be removed and weight added, but the 204 doesn't need it.
 
#16
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

Great info guys. I have a new Rem 223 Varmint and a Howa 223 lightweight that need new stocks. With the price of the B&C's and the fact they have the full length bedding, it seems to be a logical choice for me. Thanks
 
#17
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: HasgunWilltravel</div><div class="ubbcode-body">
KC117 said:
The front stud is definitely tapped into the aluminum frame, the rear is not, as you can see by the cut out LW posted. </div></div>

So they actually installed the rear stud in that open space? Any good reason for that when a solid backbone would be an inch or so away?
Click to expand...
 
#19
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

Have you guys compared the B&C Medalist tactical to the HS Precision Police/PSS stocks?

Are they pretty much the same in terms of construction, rigidity fit and finish?
 
#20
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

I just ordered my first Choate for my new build, I haven't finished the build so I haven't used the stock yet but so far I like the way it looks, feels, and handles. I don't have any experience with the B&C though.
 
#21
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hookman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Have you guys compared the B&C Medalist tactical to the HS Precision Police/PSS stocks?

Are they pretty much the same in terms of construction, rigidity fit and finish? </div></div>Yes, I have. At least Bell & Carlson Medalist stock that I have recieved has the dual front sling swivels inline as the HS Precision stock that I ordered from HS the front sling swivel studs was not even close to being inline. Makes me kinda wonder wher Precision came from?
 
#22
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: GOT M107</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Thanks for the Dope Raf, you missed out. Keep the peace brother, keep the peace. </div></div>

Anytime, Tom!
I wish I had made it, but I told you at George's retirement party that I wouldn't be up for it. Between Melita, work, and way too many people passing away....I am getting little time to shoot. I hope this years brings better things for me and mine.
 
#23
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

Between the 2, definitely the B&C. They are nice stocks for what you pay for them. Certainly a bargin. They really made a difference in the way my Rem 700 shot. One of the local gunsmiths around likes them to the point that he will not even consider any of the higher end stocks.
 
#24
Re: B & C medalist vs Choate tactical

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: 700xcr</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Hookman</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Have you guys compared the B&C Medalist tactical to the HS Precision Police/PSS stocks?

Are they pretty much the same in terms of construction, rigidity fit and finish? </div></div>Yes, I have. At least Bell & Carlson Medalist stock that I have recieved has the dual front sling swivels inline as the HS Precision stock that I ordered from HS the front sling swivel studs was not even close to being inline. Makes me kinda wonder wher Precision came from? </div></div>

Thanks for the info.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Center Mass
SOLD WTS- B&C Medalist w/ CDI Bottom Metal **Reduced**
Replies
15
Views
624
Center Mass
Center Mass
Host
Whats the correct picatinny adapter for a B&C Tactical Stock?
Replies
3
Views
223
Host
Host
UKMan
First bolt precision gun
Replies
49
Views
1K
Turkeytider
T
R
SOLD Tikka T3 Tactical Rifle .223 in Manners MCS-T4A Carbon Fiber Elite Stock
Replies
10
Views
2K
RedBreast21
R
C
?? advice on selecting 300 prc rifle ??
Replies
12
Views
603
cellular
C
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts