Bullet weight question

Smurph_

Private
Minuteman
Apr 30, 2021
49
50
Texas
I am shooting a 26” .308 rifle and I’m trying to get opinions on bullet weight for 1000 yard shooting. I have shot 168grn and 175grn loads at this distance and the 168 requires less adjustment. Apart from energy in target, is there a clear cut advantage to a heavier bullet?
 
I don’t have a chrono, but I imagine I’m getting pretty high velocity out of a 26” 1:12 barrel. The bc on the 175s is significantly higher, but both have shot 1000 for me no problem.
 
I am shooting a 26” .308 rifle and I’m trying to get opinions on bullet weight for 1000 yard shooting. I have shot 168grn and 175grn loads at this distance and the 168 requires less adjustment. Apart from energy in target, is there a clear cut advantage to a heavier bullet?
Familiarize yourself with ballistic coefficients, and use them to compare bullets. Bullet weight is only a general indicator of how slippery a bullet will be. For example, a berger 155 hybrid has an almost identical BC to a sierra 175 smk. Launched at the same speed, they would drop and drift identically, with the 175 having more ebergy on target. But since you can launch the 155 berger roughly 150 fps faster, it will stomp the shit out of the 175. JBM has free online software to make these comparisons.
 
To answer your question directly - with form factor being equal, the heavier, higher BC bullet will have a clear cut advantage in "lag time" that equates to less wind drift. This will mitigate the effects of errors in wind estimation.

The cost of this advantage is recoil and a smaller point blank range. The danger space at distance will be nearly equivalent, and with KD targets or laser range finders, range estimate errors may not be a factor for you regardless.
 
Just gotta try a bunch of ‘em. I found the Berger 210 VLD-H to be the most accurate at 1000 yards out of my 26” 308. Launching them right at 2700.

// HIJACK INBOUND //
I gotta ask... what's your load? That's about where I topped out with my .30-06 (208 ELD-M, granted), and I was a smidge over book. I would be hugely stoked to get anything 2550 or above from the 200+ class bullets from a .308 - but, it could be I'm just tame/lame.
 
Last edited:
If you go through the 308 thread in the reloading section, you'll find posts from decades ago from a member (can't remember username) getting 2600MV with a 208 from a 20 inch barrel. It can be done apparently. He was using RL-17.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJL2
I had very good performance with my .308, shooting smk 175's using lapua brass and 43.7gr of Accurate 2520 with CCI BR-2 . I don't have the speeds written in my load book but it was moving pretty good. I think I was at 2750 or better. Drilled 1120yds repeatedly on a 10x12 plate as well as at 1000 and 700yds. 21" barrel.
 
OP: use one of the online resources for determination of max mass projo your twist will stabilize. Then look at BC for that upper bullet mass range. I like the Bergers. I've had no problem getting to 1K with an AR-10 shooting factory 168's but you can do better with heavier high BC bullets, especially in a longer barreled bolt action.
 
I shoot a 26” .308 for Tac and use a 168 ELD now. Great bullet. Get them going around 2750fps pretty easy and with a BC of .526 it does great to 1000+. Have shot them to 1250 yards in matches.

Also don’t confuse the old “168 is bad” train of thought now. As already posted here some don’t understand this. That is based on the 168 SMK which is not good at transonic and has a low .462 BC. Newer 168 bullets can do very well at long range and have better BCs than the old 175 SMK that people praise. Same for the newer 175/178 which are about the heaviest I go to in a .308. I find that weight range is a good all around for BC and flatter shooting. You can lob in heavier bullets and get some better wind or shoot flatter with lighter bullets but I find the 168-178 mid range to be a good place for the .308.
 
I am shooting a 26” .308 rifle and I’m trying to get opinions on bullet weight for 1000 yard shooting. I have shot 168grn and 175grn loads at this distance and the 168 requires less adjustment. Apart from energy in target, is there a clear cut advantage to a heavier bullet?
Have you tried the 169 SMK? There's been a pretty long discussion about it here. It appears to hit the sweet spot for .308 - if you can find them. I've been shooting factory FGMM 175 SMK and 185 Berger JN exclusively for the past few years as they shoot very well out of my 24" Howa .308, and I layed in a pretty deep supply, but this Sierra 169 SMK makes me want to get back into reloading again.
 
I shoot a 26” .308 for Tac and use a 168 ELD now. Great bullet. Get them going around 2750fps pretty easy and with a BC of .526 it does great to 1000+. Have shot them to 1250 yards in matches.

Also don’t confuse the old “168 is bad” train of thought now. As already posted here some don’t understand this. That is based on the 168 SMK which is not good at transonic and has a low .462 BC. Newer 168 bullets can do very well at long range and have better BCs than the old 175 SMK that people praise. Same for the newer 175/178 which are about the heaviest I go to in a .308. I find that weight range is a good all around for BC and flatter shooting. You can lob in heavier bullets and get some better wind or shoot flatter with lighter bullets but I find the 168-178 mid range to be a good place for the .308.

I'm also running 168 ELD-Ms at 2750, and that combo is pretty potent for a 308 trainer ot tac class rifle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rob01
// HIJACK INBOUND //
I gotta ask... what's your load? That's about where I topped out with my .30-06 (208 ELD-M, granted), and I was a smidge over book. I would be hugely stoked to get anything 2550 or above from the 200+ class bullets from a .308 - but, it could be I'm just tame/lame.
My load is 47.7 grains of RL-17 if my memory serves me. I’m sure it’s hot and I have to single load them. But it’s just so damn accurate. The Lapua brass seems to take it. 26” Mullerworks barrel chambered by the boys at Southern Precision Rifles. I also don’t shoot when it’s hot outside (I’ll be on a river somewhere instead) so I can’t speak to temperature sensitivity with it. Anyway that is the load I worked up for hunting. Too much money and recoil for casual target shooting so I’m currently running the 155 and 168 ELD-M’s with Shooters World Precision Rifle or RL-15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJL2
^And my RL17 load was 45 grains out of Fed GMM brass 3.043 coal, ~2650 with 208 eld-m. URP was better with temperature changes though.

IMG_20201125_124544.jpgIMG_20201125_141052.jpgIMG_20201125_141042.jpgIMG_20200709_143913.jpgIMG_20200709_143901.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJL2