Burris XTR PRO 5.5-30x56 SCR2 vs Leupold MK5 7-35x56 MIL PR2 for ELR & PRS

dzz

Private
Minuteman
Jan 11, 2023
18
2
VA
I have seen few threads comparing Burris XTR PRO 5.5-30x56 and Leupold MK5 7-35x56 MIL PR2 but I haven't found anything from ELR shooters (over 1000 yards). I'd also like to use the scope for PRS matches, so if anyone has used both (or one of the two) for PRS, I'd like to hear from you which one you like more and why.
 
I don’t shoot PRS, but have shot and looked though both scopes out on the range. I have the Burris XTR-III 5.5-30x SCR2 MIL, and have looked and shot through other people’s MK5’s.

I recommend the Burris… IMO, the SCR2 is a better reticle design. Glass is similar in both, so the Burris is priced about right, while Leopold is overpriced for what you get. The Burris is also stronger and more robust, so it is heavier, and just feels more quality, IMO. It also tracks true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: -H-
I know a number of guys in PRS who switched from the MK5 to the XTR PRO and never looked back. PR2 is a great reticle, but the XTR PRO has everyone beat when it comes to features, especially PRS centric features. FOV between the two is going to be night and day. I personally dislike the MK5 on it's FOV alone. It looks like peeking through a soda straw by comparison to most other options out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xxerexx and FuhQ
"What the pros are paid to use"

A MK5 isn't holding anyone back, but most all of those guys are bought and paid for by Leupold. I mean, if they paid me enough to justify shooting 2 day matches all year, I'd do it too. PRS isn't a cheap sport, and the MK5 isn't a bad scope.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FuhQ
I was leaning towards Burris but I haven't used Leupold MK5 so I was looking for someone who used both. What you wrote makes sense. I was looking at this article https://precisionrifleblog.com/2025...g-range-precision-shooting-what-the-pros-use/ and it looks like PRS shooters use Leupold MK5 a lot, so I wanted to hear other opinions and experiences with these 2 scopes.
A lot of sponsored shooters shoot Leopold because they get them really really cheap, or free. Not many folks out in the wild buying them with their own money at MSRP (unless they’re an armchair sniper), because it’s priced about $1,000 more than it’s worth. IMO, the new Vortex Viper HD 5-25x50 FFP is nearly on par with the MK5 optically, and is on par mechanically, and you can buy one for around $899-$999, with a better lifetime warranty. 😂
 
"What the pros are paid to use"

A MK5 isn't holding anyone back, but most all of those guys are bought and paid for by Leupold. I mean, if they paid me enough to justify shooting 2 day matches all year, I'd do it too. PRS isn't a cheap sport, and the MK5 isn't a bad scope.
They couldn’t pay me enough to shoot their overpriced subpar products.
 
I’ve got a mk5 on one of my work guns and I’ll admit it is a good scope, but I still have a bad taste in my mouth from previous experiences with Leupold.
 
I’ve shot several PRS style matches with the XTR Pro with SCR2 reticle. Great scope for match shooting. All the features are geared towards it and it’s a great all around optic.

I also own the Steiner and it is very similar. I would say I prefer the Steiner for field style shooting as the turrets are lower profile and it is a bit sleeker in that sense. For PRS I would prefer the Pro. Both the Pro and Steiner are built in Colorado so there are both American made.

I owned the Mark 5 when it first came out and just liked the Burris more so I sold off the Mark 5. Reticle options weren’t great at the time and being the 35mm tube with the 12.5 mils per rotation I just felt like it was a bit of a red headed stepchild compared to the other optics in the stable and moved on. It wasn’t a bad scope, I just found myself using others due to preference.
 
I’ve shot several PRS style matches with the XTR Pro with SCR2 reticle. Great scope for match shooting. All the features are geared towards it and it’s a great all around optic.

I also own the Steiner and it is very similar. I would say I prefer the Steiner for field style shooting as the turrets are lower profile and it is a bit sleeker in that sense. For PRS I would prefer the Pro. Both the Pro and Steiner are built in Colorado so there are both American made.

I owned the Mark 5 when it first came out and just liked the Burris more so I sold off the Mark 5. Reticle options weren’t great at the time and being the 35mm tube with the 12.5 mils per rotation I just felt like it was a bit of a red headed stepchild compared to the other optics in the stable and moved on. It wasn’t a bad scope, I just found myself using others due to preference.
How would you compare glass quality of XTR Pro and Steiner ?
Do you think that 2nd rotation indicator on Steiner is useful in matches or just nice to have feature?
 
How would you compare glass quality of XTR Pro and Steiner ?
I find the glass quality to be very similar. Honestly it seems like the same design (same coatings, same 6x erector, same manufacturing facility) with minor touches of difference, mostly in the turret design. I don't know if for a fact but it makes sense that they would have some components in common.

Do you think that 2nd rotation indicator on Steiner is useful in matches or just nice to have feature?
I don't find the 2nd rev indicator to be a deciding factor in the sense of PRS style shooting as you won't be dialing that much typically for PRS style matches with an appropriate cartridge.

The reticle, tool less zeroing, and turret design of the XTR Pro are perfect for PRS style shooting.

The Steiner is less PRS centric in its design in my opinion. It would work for PRS but the smaller locking turret design would probably be less advantageous in comparison to the Pro. For field style shooting with more rucking it would be great as it is slimmer and the locking turrets could prove useful. Also I'm running the MSR2 in the Steiner and it is more of a field type reticle vs fast, gamer style with holdovers.
 
Eurooptic is draining my wallet with the XTR-PRO SCR-2 (red) prices. I have one on my T3X 6.5cr and just bought another for a CZ457 varmint/Oryx with Burris 40moa rings. I’m getting another one when my bank balance catches up in a week or so. IMO best bang for buck sub $2000.
 
I would've been fine with the black dials but it came to me lightly used for a kick ass price...
 

Attachments

  • CZ457LH2.jpg
    CZ457LH2.jpg
    241.1 KB · Views: 22