So I had the chance to sit behind one of these High dollar stock rifles, and to say the least I was not impressed. I was talking to the owner and he said that he had quite a bit of money invested in it. Giving the rifle a look over it seemed they had taken an SPS varmint, put their one piece base on it, replaced the follower, floor plate, and trigger (with the old remington), i think they even left the original stock on it too, because the stock wasn't heavy enough to be a HSP or a B&C, and it was flimsy as fuck. talking to the guy he even had to provide his own scope or be charged almost double by them for the same one. compared to my 700P, the trigger was a little lighter than my x-mark pro (who would have guessed) and the whole thing was about 5-6 pounds lighter (mine sat in a B&C A3 at the time) with a falcon 4-14x44 on top held on by BO max 50 rings (what can i say i like a heavy sturdy gun). while he had a leupold 3-9x?? on his held on by ring that were a third the size of mine.(not knocking them just pointing out why my rifle was heavier than his) i shot 2 groups with it off of bag rests and to say the least it shot just the same (not the world's greatest marksmen) as mine. i really don't see why people pay big dollars for this trash that they could have done better themselves. I really didn't have the heart to tell this guy he had been taken for a good deal of money, and that if he had done it himself then he would have had a better rifle that fit him. But the one thing that i did tell him was about chandler's reputation, and the fact that as an old logistics Col. he was still moving shit nobody wants. the guy said that he had talked to a few military guys from camp Lejeune nearby, and they didn't have one good thing to say about the rifles chandler makes other than they made good tomato stakes. so if anyone on here hasn't heard about Iron brigade armory, maybe this could fore warn you from getting caught up in buying an expensive MOSTLY STOCK rifle.