Re: Easiest(cheapest) OBD-2 car to get to 400hp?
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Switchblade</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: hink</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Horsepower is calculated; torque is measured. Torque is simply a function of horsepower vs. RPM
Horsepower = Torque X RPM / 5252
So two different engines with similar horsepower ratings can have vastly different torque figures and will drive like two completely different animals.
2008 Suzuki Hayabusa -- 178 hp, 107 tq
110hp x 6500rpm =(715000) / 5252= 136'# of Torque for my 2002 Sportster
BUT
136'#T x 5252 = 714272 / 6500rpm = 109.888hp
These are the figures for a 110hp 1250cc Sportster at lower than it's redline capability of 7500rpm. If we use 7500rpm at full WFO redline...
110 x 7500 = 82500 / 5252 = 157'#T
157#'T x 5252 = 824564 / 7500 = 109.94hp
This is due to the fact that instead of four small cylinders with tiny pistons or two 500cc pistons, there are two very large 625cc Pistons moving to make huge torque figures with less hp.
Will a 'Busa do a sub 10 Second 1/4? Maybe. Will the Duc' do a sub 10 second 1/4...probably not. Will a 2002 SPorty do a sub 10 second pass(we call it high 9's) yes, on a good day on a track or god sticky asphalt
2008 Ducati Desmocedici -- 177 hp, 76 tq
Nearly identical hp numbers, vastly dfifferent torque. </div></div> </div></div>
The motor with more rotational mass will have more torque at a given RPM. Look at the difference between a 1990 Chevy Silverado 454SS with 230hp and 385ft/lbs and compare to a 1993 Subaru WRX at 236hp and 205lb/ft. One will eat the other off the line...given enough room, the other will end up on top. Displacement equals rotational mass -- you can turbo/blower/intercool/nitrous all you want, but there's no replacement for displacement. If you're truly looking for a kick in the pants with 100,000 mile daily driver reliability, and keeping the whole mess cheap, then there's really no substitute for an F-body or Cobra. Granted, both cars have their weak points, the Cobra has engine issues and the F-body has a small axle, but for the initial investment vs. return, they can't be beat.
I'm willing to listen to any reasonable retort for a vehicle available in the U.S.