So, this post comes about due to the new HK CC9. This appears to be the first pistol HK has released WITHOUT the paddle mag release (note they do have an almost equivalent in Europe with paddles that should come out over there for MIL/LE).. I for one, love the paddle release as I've trained with an HK for 20 year...it's instinctive for me. Yes, I have a button somewhere in the safe; but not full-sized, and not my "go-to."
Seems to be a lot of debate on another forum, almost critical of folks not wanting to let go of the paddles and adopt the button. My thought on this is that having a common platform be it micro/compact/full sized is an advantage. When the shit starts happening, do these people with paddles one day and buttons the next (seems to be a fanboy thing to carry different daily) remember that platform's manual of arms for that day....specifically if shit hits the fan? Perhaps I'm just stupid and have Joe Biden's memory; but seems commonality in this area would be prudent, unless of course you don't plan on reloading under stress.
I almost equate this with guns that have a safety (USP/1911/Beretta) vs ones that do not (Glock, VP9). If somebody has trained years and years without a safety and then gets into guns with a safety as a carry weapon and don't train really well, are they going to, in the heat of the moment, flick that safety off or is adrenalin going to kick in and they fall back to the scenario they've had the most training?
Definitely interested in The Hide's take on this.
Thanks in advance.
Seems to be a lot of debate on another forum, almost critical of folks not wanting to let go of the paddles and adopt the button. My thought on this is that having a common platform be it micro/compact/full sized is an advantage. When the shit starts happening, do these people with paddles one day and buttons the next (seems to be a fanboy thing to carry different daily) remember that platform's manual of arms for that day....specifically if shit hits the fan? Perhaps I'm just stupid and have Joe Biden's memory; but seems commonality in this area would be prudent, unless of course you don't plan on reloading under stress.
I almost equate this with guns that have a safety (USP/1911/Beretta) vs ones that do not (Glock, VP9). If somebody has trained years and years without a safety and then gets into guns with a safety as a carry weapon and don't train really well, are they going to, in the heat of the moment, flick that safety off or is adrenalin going to kick in and they fall back to the scenario they've had the most training?
Definitely interested in The Hide's take on this.
Thanks in advance.