So after sleeping on it, I think I can better explain my assertion on the scope base.
Or possibly get a better explination on my error in judgment, please.
I'm going in moa since the op has an moa scope. The op said he thought a gross error
in gun or scope was probable.
If for some reason the rail was put on backwards "the rpr comes with 20 moa rail".
Then the scope would have a 20 moa eror pointing up at 100 yards.
Adjusting for that would be possible. You turret would end up about + 21 to be on.
At 200 the scope would have a -40 moa disadvantage and allready max out the turret.
At 300yd dirt would be the only thing you could hit.
A 20 moa gross eror can not be reasonably worked with, it is angular and compounds
With distance.
The way I understand a 20 moa base is benifitial is that it starts you out with your turret
in the lower 1/3 of his range of travel to be on at 100yd, same with mil scope,
Just to lazy for doing the math, sorry.
This gross error is not about trajectory, it is about angular adjustments.
If I have this wrong please school me.
Or possibly get a better explination on my error in judgment, please.
I'm going in moa since the op has an moa scope. The op said he thought a gross error
in gun or scope was probable.
If for some reason the rail was put on backwards "the rpr comes with 20 moa rail".
Then the scope would have a 20 moa eror pointing up at 100 yards.
Adjusting for that would be possible. You turret would end up about + 21 to be on.
At 200 the scope would have a -40 moa disadvantage and allready max out the turret.
At 300yd dirt would be the only thing you could hit.
A 20 moa gross eror can not be reasonably worked with, it is angular and compounds
With distance.
The way I understand a 20 moa base is benifitial is that it starts you out with your turret
in the lower 1/3 of his range of travel to be on at 100yd, same with mil scope,
Just to lazy for doing the math, sorry.
This gross error is not about trajectory, it is about angular adjustments.
If I have this wrong please school me.